Physical Performance in Older Cohorts: A Comparison of 81-Year-Old Swedish Men and Women Born Twelve Years Apart-Results from the Swedish Study "Good Aging in Skåne".

IF 1.6 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of Aging Research Pub Date : 2021-06-05 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2021/8813992
Henrik Ekström, Sölve Elmståhl, Lena Sandin Wranker
{"title":"Physical Performance in Older Cohorts: A Comparison of 81-Year-Old Swedish Men and Women Born Twelve Years Apart-Results from the Swedish Study \"Good Aging in Skåne\".","authors":"Henrik Ekström,&nbsp;Sölve Elmståhl,&nbsp;Lena Sandin Wranker","doi":"10.1155/2021/8813992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Birth cohorts of both sexes drawn from the Swedish study \"Good Aging in Skåne\" for the years 1920-22 and 1932-34 were compared. Walking, the step test, the chair stand test, and the handgrip strength test were used as proxies for the physical performance. The results were adjusted for lifestyle habits and common chronic geriatric diseases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both men and women in the later-born cohort walked more quickly and completed the chair stand test faster, and women were also quicker in the step test. No significant differences were found in the grip test, in either the male or female cohorts. <i>Discussion</i>. Normative reference values for physical tests of subjects of different ages can be misleading unless cohort effects are considered. Furthermore, age-related trajectories can also be misinterpreted if cohort effects are neglected which, in the longer perspective, could affect health care planning.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Birth cohort effects should be considered when comparing walking speed, number of steps, chair stands, and the step test, in men and women of older age.</p>","PeriodicalId":14933,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging Research","volume":"2021 ","pages":"8813992"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8203370/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8813992","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Materials and methods: Birth cohorts of both sexes drawn from the Swedish study "Good Aging in Skåne" for the years 1920-22 and 1932-34 were compared. Walking, the step test, the chair stand test, and the handgrip strength test were used as proxies for the physical performance. The results were adjusted for lifestyle habits and common chronic geriatric diseases.

Results: Both men and women in the later-born cohort walked more quickly and completed the chair stand test faster, and women were also quicker in the step test. No significant differences were found in the grip test, in either the male or female cohorts. Discussion. Normative reference values for physical tests of subjects of different ages can be misleading unless cohort effects are considered. Furthermore, age-related trajectories can also be misinterpreted if cohort effects are neglected which, in the longer perspective, could affect health care planning.

Conclusion: Birth cohort effects should be considered when comparing walking speed, number of steps, chair stands, and the step test, in men and women of older age.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年人群的身体表现:81岁瑞典男性和出生相隔12年的女性的比较——来自瑞典研究“sk良好衰老”的结果。
材料和方法:对1920-22年和1932-34年瑞典研究“sk的良好衰老”中男女出生队列进行比较。以步行测试、踏步测试、椅站测试和握力测试作为身体表现的指标。研究结果根据生活习惯和常见的慢性老年病进行了调整。结果:出生晚的那组男性和女性走路都更快,完成椅子站立测试的速度也更快,女性在踏步测试中也更快。在握力测试中,无论是男性还是女性,都没有发现显著的差异。讨论。除非考虑队列效应,否则不同年龄受试者的体格测试的规范参考值可能具有误导性。此外,如果忽视队列效应,与年龄相关的轨迹也可能被误解,从长远来看,这可能会影响医疗保健规划。结论:在比较老年男性和女性的步行速度、步数、椅架和步数测试时,应考虑出生队列效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Aging Research
Journal of Aging Research Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Navigating the Digital Divide: Exploring the Drivers, Drawbacks, and Prospects of Social Interaction Technologies' Adoption and Usage Among Older Adults During COVID-19. Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of Sickness Impact Profile-30 (SIP-30) in Community-Dwelling Older Adults. Middle-Aged and Young People's Perspectives on Healthy Aging Through Exercise: Environmental, Psychosocial, and Individual Factors With the Photovoice Method. Psychiatric Goals of Care at the End of Life: A Qualitative Analysis of Medical Records at a Geriatric Psychiatric Outpatient Clinic. Effectiveness of Online Traditional Exercise Program on the Stress Level of Elderly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1