Impact of Using Median vs. Mean in Calculating ERBB2 FISH Results in Breast Cancer.

Cancer medicine journal Pub Date : 2021-12-01 Epub Date: 2021-04-15
Jie Song, Alexander Yu, Diana Munoz, Song Han, Manjunath Nimmakayalu, Peter C Hu, Jianli Dong
{"title":"Impact of Using Median vs. Mean in Calculating ERBB2 FISH Results in Breast Cancer.","authors":"Jie Song,&nbsp;Alexander Yu,&nbsp;Diana Munoz,&nbsp;Song Han,&nbsp;Manjunath Nimmakayalu,&nbsp;Peter C Hu,&nbsp;Jianli Dong","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ERBB2) testing is used to measure the status of ERBB2 gene expression and DNA amplification. Test results have been reported with a discrepancy as high as 20%. The purpose of this study was to improve ERBB2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) sensitivity by evaluating results generated by median as well as mean calculations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively identified breast cancer cases at our institution in which ERBB2 FISH testing was performed in-house from June 2018 to May 2020. FISH results were classified using the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines: groups 1 and 5 are FISH positive and negative, respectively, and groups 2-4 are equivocal requiring additional work-up. FISH counting sheets were collected and regrouped by median ERBB2 copy number counts and median ERBB2/CEP17 ratio and compared with the mean ERBB2 and mean ERBB2/CEP17 ratio. Intra-tumor genetic heterogeneity and CEP17 copy number gain (CEP17 ≥3) were assessed to see if they affect the discrepancy between median and mean groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-two breast cancer cases were collected and evaluated. Eleven cases (11 of 72 [15%]) had discrepant grouping by mean and median calculations. A significant number of discrepancies were found for CEP17 copy number gain (p = 0.027) but not for ERBB2 (p = 0.411), the ERBB2/CEP17 ratio (p = 0.445), FISH results (p = 0.194), or genetic heterogeneity (p = 0.465). Among the four cases regrouped to median group 1, 2 were from mean group 3 and underwent anti-ERBB2 targeted therapy and 2 were from mean groups 4 and 5 may have benefitted from targeted therapy with more than 30% amplified cells. The median may be better to reflect the monosomy subclone within tumor tissues for the case 387 moved from mean group 5 to median group 2. The 6 cases moved from mean group 5 to median group 4 with CEP17 copy number gain may have had a poor prognosis based on other study result.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Including the median calculation may increase ERBB2 sensitivity and identification of CEP17 copy number gain. Further clinical studies are necessary to examine the outcome of including median in calculating ERBB2/CEP17 values.</p>","PeriodicalId":72513,"journal":{"name":"Cancer medicine journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8171267/pdf/nihms-1695277.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer medicine journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/4/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ERBB2) testing is used to measure the status of ERBB2 gene expression and DNA amplification. Test results have been reported with a discrepancy as high as 20%. The purpose of this study was to improve ERBB2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) sensitivity by evaluating results generated by median as well as mean calculations.

Methods: We retrospectively identified breast cancer cases at our institution in which ERBB2 FISH testing was performed in-house from June 2018 to May 2020. FISH results were classified using the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines: groups 1 and 5 are FISH positive and negative, respectively, and groups 2-4 are equivocal requiring additional work-up. FISH counting sheets were collected and regrouped by median ERBB2 copy number counts and median ERBB2/CEP17 ratio and compared with the mean ERBB2 and mean ERBB2/CEP17 ratio. Intra-tumor genetic heterogeneity and CEP17 copy number gain (CEP17 ≥3) were assessed to see if they affect the discrepancy between median and mean groups.

Results: Seventy-two breast cancer cases were collected and evaluated. Eleven cases (11 of 72 [15%]) had discrepant grouping by mean and median calculations. A significant number of discrepancies were found for CEP17 copy number gain (p = 0.027) but not for ERBB2 (p = 0.411), the ERBB2/CEP17 ratio (p = 0.445), FISH results (p = 0.194), or genetic heterogeneity (p = 0.465). Among the four cases regrouped to median group 1, 2 were from mean group 3 and underwent anti-ERBB2 targeted therapy and 2 were from mean groups 4 and 5 may have benefitted from targeted therapy with more than 30% amplified cells. The median may be better to reflect the monosomy subclone within tumor tissues for the case 387 moved from mean group 5 to median group 2. The 6 cases moved from mean group 5 to median group 4 with CEP17 copy number gain may have had a poor prognosis based on other study result.

Conclusion: Including the median calculation may increase ERBB2 sensitivity and identification of CEP17 copy number gain. Further clinical studies are necessary to examine the outcome of including median in calculating ERBB2/CEP17 values.

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用中位数与平均值计算乳腺癌ERBB2 FISH结果的影响
Erb-b2受体酪氨酸激酶2 (ERBB2)检测用于检测ERBB2基因表达和DNA扩增情况。报告的测试结果差异高达20%。本研究的目的是通过评估中位数和平均值计算产生的结果来提高ERBB2荧光原位杂交(FISH)的灵敏度。方法:我们回顾性地确定了2018年6月至2020年5月在我们机构内部进行ERBB2 FISH检测的乳腺癌病例。FISH结果根据2018年美国临床肿瘤学会/美国病理学家学会指南进行分类:第1组和第5组分别为FISH阳性和阴性,第2-4组模棱两可,需要额外的检查。收集FISH计数片,按ERBB2拷贝数中位数和ERBB2/CEP17中位数比率重新分组,并与ERBB2平均值和ERBB2/CEP17平均值进行比较。评估肿瘤内遗传异质性和CEP17拷贝数增益(CEP17≥3)是否影响中位数组和平均值组之间的差异。结果:收集并评价72例乳腺癌病例。11例(72例中的11例[15%])通过均值和中位数计算存在差异分组。在CEP17拷贝数增益(p = 0.027)方面存在显著差异,但在ERBB2 (p = 0.411)、ERBB2/CEP17比值(p = 0.445)、FISH结果(p = 0.194)或遗传异质性(p = 0.465)方面没有显著差异。在重新分组为中位组1的4例患者中,2例来自平均组3并接受了抗erbb2靶向治疗,2例来自平均组4和5可能受益于靶向治疗,扩增细胞超过30%。中位数可能更好地反映肿瘤组织内的单体亚克隆,因为病例387从平均组5转移到中位数组2。从CEP17拷贝数增加的6例从平均组5转移到中位数组4,从其他研究结果来看,可能预后较差。结论:加入中位数计算可提高ERBB2的敏感性和CEP17拷贝数的识别增益。需要进一步的临床研究来检验计算ERBB2/CEP17值时纳入中位数的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ANK Therapeutic Prospects and Usefulness of PD-L1 and NK Activity as Biomarkers for Predicting Treatment Efficacy Revealed from the Treatment Course of Patients with HTLV-1-Associated Bronchioloalveolar Disease. Psychological Distress and Suicide Correlated with Long-Life Expectancy in Advanced Cancer Patients A Comprehensive Review of Management of Colorectal Liver Mets in the Current Era. Synchronous Duodenal and Jejunal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Impact of Using Median vs. Mean in Calculating ERBB2 FISH Results in Breast Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1