Jie Song, Alexander Yu, Diana Munoz, Song Han, Manjunath Nimmakayalu, Peter C Hu, Jianli Dong
{"title":"Impact of Using Median vs. Mean in Calculating ERBB2 FISH Results in Breast Cancer.","authors":"Jie Song, Alexander Yu, Diana Munoz, Song Han, Manjunath Nimmakayalu, Peter C Hu, Jianli Dong","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ERBB2) testing is used to measure the status of ERBB2 gene expression and DNA amplification. Test results have been reported with a discrepancy as high as 20%. The purpose of this study was to improve ERBB2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) sensitivity by evaluating results generated by median as well as mean calculations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively identified breast cancer cases at our institution in which ERBB2 FISH testing was performed in-house from June 2018 to May 2020. FISH results were classified using the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines: groups 1 and 5 are FISH positive and negative, respectively, and groups 2-4 are equivocal requiring additional work-up. FISH counting sheets were collected and regrouped by median ERBB2 copy number counts and median ERBB2/CEP17 ratio and compared with the mean ERBB2 and mean ERBB2/CEP17 ratio. Intra-tumor genetic heterogeneity and CEP17 copy number gain (CEP17 ≥3) were assessed to see if they affect the discrepancy between median and mean groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-two breast cancer cases were collected and evaluated. Eleven cases (11 of 72 [15%]) had discrepant grouping by mean and median calculations. A significant number of discrepancies were found for CEP17 copy number gain (p = 0.027) but not for ERBB2 (p = 0.411), the ERBB2/CEP17 ratio (p = 0.445), FISH results (p = 0.194), or genetic heterogeneity (p = 0.465). Among the four cases regrouped to median group 1, 2 were from mean group 3 and underwent anti-ERBB2 targeted therapy and 2 were from mean groups 4 and 5 may have benefitted from targeted therapy with more than 30% amplified cells. The median may be better to reflect the monosomy subclone within tumor tissues for the case 387 moved from mean group 5 to median group 2. The 6 cases moved from mean group 5 to median group 4 with CEP17 copy number gain may have had a poor prognosis based on other study result.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Including the median calculation may increase ERBB2 sensitivity and identification of CEP17 copy number gain. Further clinical studies are necessary to examine the outcome of including median in calculating ERBB2/CEP17 values.</p>","PeriodicalId":72513,"journal":{"name":"Cancer medicine journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8171267/pdf/nihms-1695277.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer medicine journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/4/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ERBB2) testing is used to measure the status of ERBB2 gene expression and DNA amplification. Test results have been reported with a discrepancy as high as 20%. The purpose of this study was to improve ERBB2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) sensitivity by evaluating results generated by median as well as mean calculations.
Methods: We retrospectively identified breast cancer cases at our institution in which ERBB2 FISH testing was performed in-house from June 2018 to May 2020. FISH results were classified using the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines: groups 1 and 5 are FISH positive and negative, respectively, and groups 2-4 are equivocal requiring additional work-up. FISH counting sheets were collected and regrouped by median ERBB2 copy number counts and median ERBB2/CEP17 ratio and compared with the mean ERBB2 and mean ERBB2/CEP17 ratio. Intra-tumor genetic heterogeneity and CEP17 copy number gain (CEP17 ≥3) were assessed to see if they affect the discrepancy between median and mean groups.
Results: Seventy-two breast cancer cases were collected and evaluated. Eleven cases (11 of 72 [15%]) had discrepant grouping by mean and median calculations. A significant number of discrepancies were found for CEP17 copy number gain (p = 0.027) but not for ERBB2 (p = 0.411), the ERBB2/CEP17 ratio (p = 0.445), FISH results (p = 0.194), or genetic heterogeneity (p = 0.465). Among the four cases regrouped to median group 1, 2 were from mean group 3 and underwent anti-ERBB2 targeted therapy and 2 were from mean groups 4 and 5 may have benefitted from targeted therapy with more than 30% amplified cells. The median may be better to reflect the monosomy subclone within tumor tissues for the case 387 moved from mean group 5 to median group 2. The 6 cases moved from mean group 5 to median group 4 with CEP17 copy number gain may have had a poor prognosis based on other study result.
Conclusion: Including the median calculation may increase ERBB2 sensitivity and identification of CEP17 copy number gain. Further clinical studies are necessary to examine the outcome of including median in calculating ERBB2/CEP17 values.