Feasibility and safety of a rapid-access transient ischemic attack clinic.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1097/JXX.0000000000000622
Sarah Hermanson, Nirali Vora, C Craig Blackmore, Barbara Williams, Nancy Isenberg
{"title":"Feasibility and safety of a rapid-access transient ischemic attack clinic.","authors":"Sarah Hermanson, Nirali Vora, C Craig Blackmore, Barbara Williams, Nancy Isenberg","doi":"10.1097/JXX.0000000000000622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the United States, patients with transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) are commonly admitted to the hospital despite evidence that low-risk TIA patients achieve improved outcomes at lower costs at specialized rapid-access TIA clinics (RATCs).</p><p><strong>Local problem: </strong>All patients experiencing TIAs at a hospital system in the Pacific Northwest were being admitted to the hospital. This project aimed to implement an RATC to relocate care for low-risk TIA patients, showing feasibility and safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following implementation of the RATC, a retrospective chart review was performed. Outcomes included days to RATC; days to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); final diagnosis; stroke-related admissions and deaths within 90 days of the RATC visit.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>From 2016 to 2018, implementation of an RATC included patient triage tools; multidisciplinary collaboration between departments; a direct scheduling pathway; and emphasis on stroke prevention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-nine patients were evaluated in the RATC, 69% (69/99) were referred from the emergency department. Sixty-six percent of patients were seen in the TIA clinic in 2 days or less, 19% at 3 days, and 15% at 4 days or more. Mean days to TIA clinic was 2.5 days (SD 2.4). Mean days (SD) to MRI was 2.1 days (SD 2.3). Forty-eight percent (48/99) had a final diagnosis of probable TIA, followed by 32% (32/99) who had other diagnoses; 15% (15/99) migraine variant; 4% (4/99) with stroke. Two percent (2/99) of patients had a stroke-related admission within 90 days, another 2% (2/99) died of non-stroke-related causes within 90 days of the RATC visit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Utilization of RATCs is feasible and safe. Nurse practitioners are integral in delivering this innovative, cost-effective model of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":48812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners","volume":" ","pages":"550-556"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JXX.0000000000000622","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: In the United States, patients with transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) are commonly admitted to the hospital despite evidence that low-risk TIA patients achieve improved outcomes at lower costs at specialized rapid-access TIA clinics (RATCs).

Local problem: All patients experiencing TIAs at a hospital system in the Pacific Northwest were being admitted to the hospital. This project aimed to implement an RATC to relocate care for low-risk TIA patients, showing feasibility and safety.

Methods: Following implementation of the RATC, a retrospective chart review was performed. Outcomes included days to RATC; days to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); final diagnosis; stroke-related admissions and deaths within 90 days of the RATC visit.

Interventions: From 2016 to 2018, implementation of an RATC included patient triage tools; multidisciplinary collaboration between departments; a direct scheduling pathway; and emphasis on stroke prevention.

Results: Ninety-nine patients were evaluated in the RATC, 69% (69/99) were referred from the emergency department. Sixty-six percent of patients were seen in the TIA clinic in 2 days or less, 19% at 3 days, and 15% at 4 days or more. Mean days to TIA clinic was 2.5 days (SD 2.4). Mean days (SD) to MRI was 2.1 days (SD 2.3). Forty-eight percent (48/99) had a final diagnosis of probable TIA, followed by 32% (32/99) who had other diagnoses; 15% (15/99) migraine variant; 4% (4/99) with stroke. Two percent (2/99) of patients had a stroke-related admission within 90 days, another 2% (2/99) died of non-stroke-related causes within 90 days of the RATC visit.

Conclusions: Utilization of RATCs is feasible and safe. Nurse practitioners are integral in delivering this innovative, cost-effective model of care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
快速通道短暂性脑缺血发作门诊的可行性和安全性。
背景:在美国,短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)患者通常会住院,尽管有证据表明低风险TIA患者在专门的快速访问TIA诊所(RATCs)以较低的成本获得更好的结果。当地问题:在太平洋西北地区的一家医院系统中,所有经历TIAs的患者都被送往该医院。本项目旨在实施RATC,为低风险TIA患者重新安置护理,显示可行性和安全性。方法:RATC实施后,进行回顾性图表回顾。结果包括到RATC的天数;日至磁共振成像(MRI);最后的诊断;与中风相关的入院人数和死亡人数在RATC访问后90天内。干预措施:从2016年到2018年,RATC的实施包括患者分诊工具;部门间多学科合作;直接调度路径;并强调预防中风。结果:99例患者在RATC中被评估,69%(69/99)从急诊科转介。66%的患者在2天或更短的时间内在TIA诊所就诊,19%在3天,15%在4天或更长时间。到TIA诊所的平均时间为2.5天(SD 2.4)。到MRI的平均时间(SD)为2.1天(SD为2.3天)。48%(48/99)最终诊断为可能的TIA,其次是32%(32/99)有其他诊断;15%(15/99)偏头痛变体;4%(4/99)为中风。2%(2/99)的患者在90天内卒中相关入院,另有2%(2/99)的患者在RATC就诊后90天内死于非卒中相关原因。结论:RATCs的使用是安全可行的。执业护士在提供这种创新的、具有成本效益的护理模式方面是不可或缺的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners
Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-NURSING
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
172
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners (JAANP) is a monthly peer-reviewed professional journal that serves as the official publication of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners. Published since 1989, the JAANP provides a strong clinical focus with articles related to primary, secondary, and tertiary care, nurse practitioner education, health policy, ethics and ethical issues, and health care delivery. The journal publishes original research, integrative/comprehensive reviews, case studies, a variety of topics in clinical practice, and theory-based articles related to patient and professional education. Although the majority of nurse practitioners function in primary care, there is an increasing focus on the provision of care across all types of systems from acute to long-term care settings.
期刊最新文献
Unregulated male sexual enhancement treatments: Perils and pitfalls for patients and providers Enhancing competency-based assessment: Implementing oral boards in nursing education Enhancing foot care education and support strategies in adults with type 2 diabetes: A qualitative study The important primary care role of neonatal nurse practitioners in the neonatal intensive care unit. Bridging the education-practice gap: Changing nurse practitioner skills through education innovation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1