Shayla A. Sullivant MD (is Child and Adolescent Psychiatrist, Division of Developmental and Behavioral Health, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, and Associate Professor of Pediatrics, University of Missouri–Kansas City (UMKC) School of Medicine.), Debby Brookstein MSW, LCSW, LSCSW (is Senior Director of Social Work, Children's Mercy Kansas City.), Michelle Camerer LCSW, LMSW, LSCSW (is Social Work, Manager Children's Mercy Kansas City.), Joan Benson MSN, RN-BC, CPN (is Director, Clinical Informatics and Practice, Children's Mercy Kansas City.), Mark Connelly PhD (is Director of Research, Developmental and Behavioral Health, Children's Mercy Kansas City, and Professor of Pediatrics UMKC School of Medicine.), John Lantos MD (is Director, Bioethics Center, Children's Mercy Kansas City.), Karen Cox PhD, RN, FAAN (is President, Chamberlain University, Chicago, Illinois.), Kathy Goggin PhD (is Director, Division of Health Services and Outcomes Research, Children's Mercy Kansas City, and Professor, UMKC Schools of Medicine and Pharmacy)
{"title":"Implementing Universal Suicide Risk Screening in a Pediatric Hospital","authors":"Shayla A. Sullivant MD (is Child and Adolescent Psychiatrist, Division of Developmental and Behavioral Health, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, and Associate Professor of Pediatrics, University of Missouri–Kansas City (UMKC) School of Medicine.), Debby Brookstein MSW, LCSW, LSCSW (is Senior Director of Social Work, Children's Mercy Kansas City.), Michelle Camerer LCSW, LMSW, LSCSW (is Social Work, Manager Children's Mercy Kansas City.), Joan Benson MSN, RN-BC, CPN (is Director, Clinical Informatics and Practice, Children's Mercy Kansas City.), Mark Connelly PhD (is Director of Research, Developmental and Behavioral Health, Children's Mercy Kansas City, and Professor of Pediatrics UMKC School of Medicine.), John Lantos MD (is Director, Bioethics Center, Children's Mercy Kansas City.), Karen Cox PhD, RN, FAAN (is President, Chamberlain University, Chicago, Illinois.), Kathy Goggin PhD (is Director, Division of Health Services and Outcomes Research, Children's Mercy Kansas City, and Professor, UMKC Schools of Medicine and Pharmacy)","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2021.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Health care providers are in a prime position to identify teens at risk for suicide, yet many do not. The research team developed and implemented a hospitalwide program to identify teens at elevated risk for suicide and connect them with services.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>Screening was implemented at both locations of a pediatric hospital, including two </span>emergency departments<span>, three urgent care clinics, and ambulatory clinics. Patients aged 12 years and older presenting for care were screened for suicide risk using the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) in most settings, while the Columbia–Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) was used in mental health areas. A social worker responded to positive screens to complete a more thorough assessment and determine next steps. Social workers also completed outreach to patients in the weeks following a positive screen. Implementation began with pilot locations and expanded after refinements were made. Stakeholders provided screening recommendations, and education was provided prior to implementation. The cost of implementation was calculated based on the time screening required from nursing and social work.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Review of the program focused on implementation fidelity, quality improvement, and trends among screening results. During the first year of screening, 138,598 screens were completed, and 6.8% of screens were positive for elevated risk. The annualized cost of the program was estimated to be $887,708.65 for personnel directly involved in screening and following up on positive screens.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Early involvement of stakeholders and hospital leaders and a robust response plan were essential to successful implementation of this suicide-screening program.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14835,"journal":{"name":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","volume":"47 8","pages":"Pages 496-502"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jcjq.2021.05.001","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1553725021001240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Abstract
Background
Health care providers are in a prime position to identify teens at risk for suicide, yet many do not. The research team developed and implemented a hospitalwide program to identify teens at elevated risk for suicide and connect them with services.
Methods
Screening was implemented at both locations of a pediatric hospital, including two emergency departments, three urgent care clinics, and ambulatory clinics. Patients aged 12 years and older presenting for care were screened for suicide risk using the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) in most settings, while the Columbia–Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) was used in mental health areas. A social worker responded to positive screens to complete a more thorough assessment and determine next steps. Social workers also completed outreach to patients in the weeks following a positive screen. Implementation began with pilot locations and expanded after refinements were made. Stakeholders provided screening recommendations, and education was provided prior to implementation. The cost of implementation was calculated based on the time screening required from nursing and social work.
Results
Review of the program focused on implementation fidelity, quality improvement, and trends among screening results. During the first year of screening, 138,598 screens were completed, and 6.8% of screens were positive for elevated risk. The annualized cost of the program was estimated to be $887,708.65 for personnel directly involved in screening and following up on positive screens.
Conclusion
Early involvement of stakeholders and hospital leaders and a robust response plan were essential to successful implementation of this suicide-screening program.