Buprenorphine Naloxone and Extended Release Injectable Naltrexone for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder Among a Veteran Patient Sample: A Retrospective Chart Review.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Dual Diagnosis Pub Date : 2021-07-01 Epub Date: 2021-06-27 DOI:10.1080/15504263.2021.1942380
Steven D Shirk, Victoria Ameral, Shane W Kraus, Joseph Houchins, Megan Kelly, Kendra Pugh, Erin Reilly, Nitigna Desai
{"title":"Buprenorphine Naloxone and Extended Release Injectable Naltrexone for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder Among a Veteran Patient Sample: A Retrospective Chart Review.","authors":"Steven D Shirk,&nbsp;Victoria Ameral,&nbsp;Shane W Kraus,&nbsp;Joseph Houchins,&nbsp;Megan Kelly,&nbsp;Kendra Pugh,&nbsp;Erin Reilly,&nbsp;Nitigna Desai","doi":"10.1080/15504263.2021.1942380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Previous research has demonstrated the effectiveness of both extended-release injectable naltrexone (XR-NTX) and buprenorphine/naloxone (BUP-NX) in the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD). However, studies using real-world samples with multiple medical and psychiatric comorbidities are lacking. The study's primary aims were to: (1) compare clinical presentations in an inclusive sample of OUD-diagnosed US military veterans receiving XR-NTX and BUP-NX, and (2) investigate differences in 90-day treatment outcomes between these two groups. <b>Methods:</b> The medical records of 79 patients receiving medications to treat OUD in a VA hospital's addiction outpatient treatment program were reviewed retrospectively. The analysis included all veterans who initiated medication treatment during the study period. Differences between medication groups on co-occurring diagnoses, treatment retention, and related outcomes were examined. <b>Results:</b> The two groups were similar in medical and psychiatric comorbidity, although the BUP-NX group were more likely to have a pain diagnosis. No statistically significant differences in retention or toxicology results were found between the two groups over the 90-day study period. The rate of positive urine screens for the BUP-NX group was 19.2% for opiates and 13.5% for other illicit substances, and 3.7% and 11.1% respectively for the XR- NTX group. <b>Conclusion:</b> There was no evidence that 90-days outcomes differed for veterans based on medication received, and there were more similarities than differences in clinical characteristics. Additional research is needed, including larger sample size and prospective randomized control trial to evaluate VA patients' treatment outcomes receiving BUP-NX or XR-NTX for OUD.</p>","PeriodicalId":46571,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","volume":"17 3","pages":"207-215"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15504263.2021.1942380","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15504263.2021.1942380","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: Previous research has demonstrated the effectiveness of both extended-release injectable naltrexone (XR-NTX) and buprenorphine/naloxone (BUP-NX) in the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD). However, studies using real-world samples with multiple medical and psychiatric comorbidities are lacking. The study's primary aims were to: (1) compare clinical presentations in an inclusive sample of OUD-diagnosed US military veterans receiving XR-NTX and BUP-NX, and (2) investigate differences in 90-day treatment outcomes between these two groups. Methods: The medical records of 79 patients receiving medications to treat OUD in a VA hospital's addiction outpatient treatment program were reviewed retrospectively. The analysis included all veterans who initiated medication treatment during the study period. Differences between medication groups on co-occurring diagnoses, treatment retention, and related outcomes were examined. Results: The two groups were similar in medical and psychiatric comorbidity, although the BUP-NX group were more likely to have a pain diagnosis. No statistically significant differences in retention or toxicology results were found between the two groups over the 90-day study period. The rate of positive urine screens for the BUP-NX group was 19.2% for opiates and 13.5% for other illicit substances, and 3.7% and 11.1% respectively for the XR- NTX group. Conclusion: There was no evidence that 90-days outcomes differed for veterans based on medication received, and there were more similarities than differences in clinical characteristics. Additional research is needed, including larger sample size and prospective randomized control trial to evaluate VA patients' treatment outcomes receiving BUP-NX or XR-NTX for OUD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
丁丙诺啡纳洛酮和缓释注射纳曲酮治疗退伍军人阿片类药物使用障碍:回顾性图表回顾。
目的:以往的研究已经证明了缓释注射纳曲酮(XR-NTX)和丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮(BUP-NX)治疗阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)的有效性。然而,缺乏使用多种医学和精神合并症的真实世界样本的研究。该研究的主要目的是:(1)比较接受XR-NTX和BUP-NX治疗的诊断为oud的美国退伍军人的临床表现,(2)调查这两组之间90天治疗结果的差异。方法:回顾性分析VA医院成瘾门诊治疗项目中79例接受药物治疗的OUD患者的病历。该分析包括所有在研究期间开始药物治疗的退伍军人。研究了两组药物在共发诊断、治疗保留和相关结果方面的差异。结果:两组在医学和精神合并症方面相似,尽管BUP-NX组更有可能有疼痛诊断。在90天的研究期间,两组之间的滞留或毒理学结果没有统计学上的显著差异。BUP-NX组阿片类药物尿检阳性率为19.2%,其他违禁药物尿检阳性率为13.5%,XR- NTX组尿检阳性率分别为3.7%和11.1%。结论:没有证据表明退伍军人的90天结果因所接受的药物而不同,临床特征的相似性大于差异。需要进一步的研究,包括更大的样本量和前瞻性随机对照试验来评估VA患者接受BUP-NX或XR-NTX治疗OUD的治疗结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
13.60%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Journal of Dual Diagnosis is a quarterly, international publication that focuses on the full spectrum of complexities regarding dual diagnosis. The co-occurrence of mental health and substance use disorders, or “dual diagnosis,” is one of the quintessential issues in behavioral health. Why do such high rates of co-occurrence exist? What does it tell us about risk profiles? How do these linked disorders affect people, their families, and the communities in which they live? What are the natural paths to recovery? What specific treatments are most helpful and how can new ones be developed? How can we enhance the implementation of evidence-based practices at clinical, administrative, and policy levels? How can we help clients to learn active recovery skills and adopt needed supports, clinicians to master new interventions, programs to implement effective services, and communities to foster healthy adjustment? The Journal addresses each of these perplexing challenges.
期刊最新文献
Mapping the Pathways Between Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Depression, and Alcohol and Cannabis Use: A Network Analysis. Simultaneous Substance Use With Alcohol in a Community-Based Sample of Young Adults. Spirituality/Religion Among First Responders With and Without Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Alcohol Misuse. Nationwide Assessment of Chronic Pain among Hospitalized Individuals with Co-occurring Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and Substance Use Disorder in the United States. Drinking to Cope With the COVID-19 Pandemic Mediates Pathways From COVID-19 Anxiety to Alcohol Use and Alcohol Myopia Consequences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1