Asymmetry Theory and China-Philippines Relations with the South China Sea as a Case.

IF 1.2 Q1 AREA STUDIES East Asia Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-06-22 DOI:10.1007/s12140-021-09370-1
Amane Yamazaki, Suguru Osawa
{"title":"Asymmetry Theory and China-Philippines Relations with the South China Sea as a Case.","authors":"Amane Yamazaki,&nbsp;Suguru Osawa","doi":"10.1007/s12140-021-09370-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article analyzes how the structural factor of asymmetry affects China's relations with a small power. As the studies of Brantly Womack suggest, asymmetry theory is conducive to deepening the understanding of China's relations with smaller countries. We argue that an examination of China-Philippines relations from 2010 to 2020 indicates that Beijing has trouble managing its ties with Manila because of the asymmetry in the nature of the relations, which originates in the power and status gaps between them. The asymmetrical structure of this bilateral interplay inclines China to underestimate and neglect the Philippines' intentions and determination to resist, which has been made especially clear in the South China Sea disputes. As a result, their relationship experienced repeated ups and downs throughout the 2010s, in particular over the maritime sovereignty issue. This study also hints at the complicated situations surrounding China where many medium-sized and small states attempt to maneuver among great powers. Without affinities with such governments in the Indo-Pacific region, it will be difficult for Beijing to achieve a peaceful rise and acquire status as a next-generation superpower.</p>","PeriodicalId":53913,"journal":{"name":"East Asia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s12140-021-09370-1","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-021-09370-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This article analyzes how the structural factor of asymmetry affects China's relations with a small power. As the studies of Brantly Womack suggest, asymmetry theory is conducive to deepening the understanding of China's relations with smaller countries. We argue that an examination of China-Philippines relations from 2010 to 2020 indicates that Beijing has trouble managing its ties with Manila because of the asymmetry in the nature of the relations, which originates in the power and status gaps between them. The asymmetrical structure of this bilateral interplay inclines China to underestimate and neglect the Philippines' intentions and determination to resist, which has been made especially clear in the South China Sea disputes. As a result, their relationship experienced repeated ups and downs throughout the 2010s, in particular over the maritime sovereignty issue. This study also hints at the complicated situations surrounding China where many medium-sized and small states attempt to maneuver among great powers. Without affinities with such governments in the Indo-Pacific region, it will be difficult for Beijing to achieve a peaceful rise and acquire status as a next-generation superpower.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不对称理论与中菲关系——以南海为例
本文分析了不对称的结构性因素如何影响中国与小大国的关系。正如布兰特利·沃马克(Brantly Womack)的研究表明,不对称理论有助于加深对中国与小国关系的理解。我们认为,对2010年至2020年中菲关系的研究表明,由于两国关系本质上的不对称,北京在处理与马尼拉的关系方面遇到了麻烦,这种不对称源于两国之间的权力和地位差距。这种双边相互作用的不对称结构使中国倾向于低估和忽视菲律宾抵抗的意图和决心,这在南中国海争端中表现得尤为明显。因此,两国关系在2010年代经历了反复的起伏,特别是在海洋主权问题上。这一研究也暗示了中国周围的复杂情况,许多中小国家试图在大国之间游弋。如果没有与这些国家的亲缘关系,中国将很难实现和平崛起,成为下一代超级大国。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
East Asia
East Asia AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: East Asia, formerly the Journal of Northeast Asian Studies, is the first journal to examine the interplay between politics and culture underlying major developments in China, Japan, Korea, and the Pacific Rim. It is distinguished by a unique, transnational approach to political, economic, and cultural issues. Focusing on the continuing influence these nations exert upon each other, this international quarterly examines the competition, assimilation, and tensions that now shape events in the region, and will for years to come.
期刊最新文献
The CNN Effect and South Korea’s Humanitarian Response to North Korea: A Media-Driven Policy? The Role of Vietnam in Resolving Regional Conflicts in Mainland Southeast Asia in the First Half of the Nineteenth Century Navigating the Persian Gulf Security Complex: Saudi-Iran Rapprochement in an Era of Great Power Competition Singapore’s Indo-Pacific Strategy: A Case of Principled Hedging Exploring Opportunities and Limitations of Kazakhstan’s Multilateral and Bilateral Cooperation in Renewable Energy within Central Asia: A Comprehensive Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1