Patient perspectives on living with severe asthma in Denmark and Sweden.

IF 1.8 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM European Clinical Respiratory Journal Pub Date : 2020-12-16 DOI:10.1080/20018525.2020.1856024
Georgia Papapostolou, Alf Tunsäter, Jonas Binnmyr, Gunilla Telg, Klaus Roslind
{"title":"Patient perspectives on living with severe asthma in Denmark and Sweden.","authors":"Georgia Papapostolou,&nbsp;Alf Tunsäter,&nbsp;Jonas Binnmyr,&nbsp;Gunilla Telg,&nbsp;Klaus Roslind","doi":"10.1080/20018525.2020.1856024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Severe asthma has an acknowledged impact on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and is associated with substantial health care costs. This study aimed to investigate the patients' own experiences of the disease, perceptions of HRQOL, and awareness of disease management. <b>Methods</b>: This study included severe asthma patients in Sweden and Denmark. A quantitative Web-based survey and qualitative in-depth interviews (IDIs) were conducted. The survey included St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), Asthma Control Test (ACT), Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI), and a study-specific questionnaire on quality of care and disease awareness. Telephone-based IDIs were conducted by medical interviewers following a semi-structured interview guide. <b>Results</b>: A total of 93 patients participated in the Web survey, and 33 participated in the IDIs. In the survey, the vast majority (77%; 72/93) had uncontrolled asthma (ACT<20). Mean total SGRQ score was 47.4 (59.7 symptom, 53.7 activity, 39.9 impact scores). Nearly 60% were treated in primary care. The IDIs revealed a long path to diagnosis, substantial and constant need for adaptations because of disease limitations, high burden on family members, social restrictions, and sick leaves and income losses. Patient awareness about guidelines, treatment goals, and available therapies was poor, and a low level of satisfaction by primary health care was seen. <b>Conclusions</b>: The vast majority of this severe asthma population had uncontrolled asthma and poor access to lung expert physicians. Impaired HRQOL despite patients' adaptations was indicated. These findings highlight the need for structured patient education and greater access to units with disease-specific knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":11872,"journal":{"name":"European Clinical Respiratory Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20018525.2020.1856024","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Clinical Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20018525.2020.1856024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Severe asthma has an acknowledged impact on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and is associated with substantial health care costs. This study aimed to investigate the patients' own experiences of the disease, perceptions of HRQOL, and awareness of disease management. Methods: This study included severe asthma patients in Sweden and Denmark. A quantitative Web-based survey and qualitative in-depth interviews (IDIs) were conducted. The survey included St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), Asthma Control Test (ACT), Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI), and a study-specific questionnaire on quality of care and disease awareness. Telephone-based IDIs were conducted by medical interviewers following a semi-structured interview guide. Results: A total of 93 patients participated in the Web survey, and 33 participated in the IDIs. In the survey, the vast majority (77%; 72/93) had uncontrolled asthma (ACT<20). Mean total SGRQ score was 47.4 (59.7 symptom, 53.7 activity, 39.9 impact scores). Nearly 60% were treated in primary care. The IDIs revealed a long path to diagnosis, substantial and constant need for adaptations because of disease limitations, high burden on family members, social restrictions, and sick leaves and income losses. Patient awareness about guidelines, treatment goals, and available therapies was poor, and a low level of satisfaction by primary health care was seen. Conclusions: The vast majority of this severe asthma population had uncontrolled asthma and poor access to lung expert physicians. Impaired HRQOL despite patients' adaptations was indicated. These findings highlight the need for structured patient education and greater access to units with disease-specific knowledge.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
丹麦和瑞典患者对重度哮喘患者生活的看法。
背景:严重哮喘对健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)有公认的影响,并与大量医疗保健费用相关。本研究旨在了解患者自身的疾病经历、对HRQOL的认知以及对疾病管理的认识。方法:本研究纳入瑞典和丹麦的重度哮喘患者。进行了基于网络的定量调查和定性深入访谈(IDIs)。调查包括圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)、哮喘控制测试(ACT)、工作效率和活动障碍(WPAI),以及一份关于护理质量和疾病意识的研究特定问卷。电话调查是由医疗采访者按照半结构化访谈指南进行的。结果:共有93例患者参加了网络调查,33例患者参加了IDIs。在调查中,绝大多数人(77%;结论:这些严重哮喘人群中绝大多数哮喘不受控制,且难以获得肺病专家医生的治疗。尽管患者适应,HRQOL受损。这些发现强调了有必要对患者进行结构化的教育,并让更多的人能够接触到具有特定疾病知识的单位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comorbid allergy and rhinitis and patient-related outcomes in asthma and COPD: a cross-sectional study. Lung function measurements in the Greenlandic Inuit population: results from the Greenlandic health survey 2017-2019. Asthma severity: the patient's point of view. Comparison of lung volumes measured with computed tomography and whole-body plethysmography - a systematic review. Efficacy and safety of benralizumab in elderly patients with severe eosinophilic asthma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1