Effect of Different Irrigation Activation Techniques on Sealer Penetration: A Confocal Laser Microscopy Study.

Zeliha Uğur Aydin, Sevim Koşumcu, Büşra Meşeci
{"title":"Effect of Different Irrigation Activation Techniques on Sealer Penetration: A Confocal Laser Microscopy Study.","authors":"Zeliha Uğur Aydin,&nbsp;Sevim Koşumcu,&nbsp;Büşra Meşeci","doi":"10.3290/j.cjdr.b1530507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the efficiency of a new sonic powered irrigation system named EDDY (VDW, Munich, Germany), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) and conventional needle irrigation (CNI) in root canal sealer penetration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 45 mandibular premolars were instrumented up to size 30, 0.9 taper and randomly divided into three groups (n = 15) depending on the final irrigation activation technique: EDDY, PUI or CNI. After the final irrigation procedures, the root canals were obturated with labelled sealer mixed with 0.1% rhodamine B. Transverse sections at 3, 5 and 7 mm from the root apex were examined using confocal laser scanning microscopy. The maximum depth and total area and percentage of sealer penetration were measured using ImageJ analysis software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the EDDY group, the penetration depth was higher compared to the CNI group in the apical and middle sections and compared to the PUI group in the apical section (P ˂ 0.05). The penetration area in the EDDY group was higher compared to the CNI group in all sections and compared to the PUI group in the coronal section (P ˂ 0.05). The percentage of penetration was higher in the EDDY group compared to the CNI group in all sections and compared to the PUI group in the coronal section (P ˂ 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the present study, sealer penetration was superior in the EDDY group than the CNI group in the apical section. In the middle and coronal sections, sealer penetration was similar for the EDDY and PUI groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":74983,"journal":{"name":"The Chinese journal of dental research : the official journal of the Scientific Section of the Chinese Stomatological Association (CSA)","volume":"24 2","pages":"113-118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Chinese journal of dental research : the official journal of the Scientific Section of the Chinese Stomatological Association (CSA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.cjdr.b1530507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficiency of a new sonic powered irrigation system named EDDY (VDW, Munich, Germany), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) and conventional needle irrigation (CNI) in root canal sealer penetration.

Methods: A total of 45 mandibular premolars were instrumented up to size 30, 0.9 taper and randomly divided into three groups (n = 15) depending on the final irrigation activation technique: EDDY, PUI or CNI. After the final irrigation procedures, the root canals were obturated with labelled sealer mixed with 0.1% rhodamine B. Transverse sections at 3, 5 and 7 mm from the root apex were examined using confocal laser scanning microscopy. The maximum depth and total area and percentage of sealer penetration were measured using ImageJ analysis software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).

Results: In the EDDY group, the penetration depth was higher compared to the CNI group in the apical and middle sections and compared to the PUI group in the apical section (P ˂ 0.05). The penetration area in the EDDY group was higher compared to the CNI group in all sections and compared to the PUI group in the coronal section (P ˂ 0.05). The percentage of penetration was higher in the EDDY group compared to the CNI group in all sections and compared to the PUI group in the coronal section (P ˂ 0.05).

Conclusion: In the present study, sealer penetration was superior in the EDDY group than the CNI group in the apical section. In the middle and coronal sections, sealer penetration was similar for the EDDY and PUI groups.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同灌溉激活技术对封口剂渗透的影响:共聚焦激光显微镜研究。
目的:比较新型超声灌洗系统EDDY (VDW, Munich, Germany)、被动超声灌洗(PUI)和常规针灌洗(CNI)在根管密封器渗透中的效果。方法:将45颗下颌前磨牙矫治至30、0.9锥度,根据最终灌洗激活方式随机分为EDDY、PUI或CNI三组(n = 15)。在最后的灌洗程序后,用含有0.1%罗丹明b的标记密封剂封闭根管,使用共聚焦激光扫描显微镜检查距离根尖3,5和7mm的横切面。使用ImageJ分析软件(National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA)测量最大深度、总面积和密封剂穿透百分比。结果:EDDY组在根尖和中段穿刺深度均高于CNI组,根尖穿刺深度均高于PUI组(P小于0.05)。与CNI组相比,EDDY组在各切面上的穿透面积都要大,冠状切面上的穿透面积也比PUI组大(P小于0.05)。与CNI组相比,EDDY组在所有切片上的穿透率都更高,冠状切片上的穿透率也比PUI组高(P小于0.05)。结论:在本研究中,在根尖部分,EDDY组比CNI组有更好的封口剂渗透。在中间和冠状切片上,EDDY组和PUI组的封口器穿透力相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Application of Chairside CAD/CAM and Its Influencing Factors among Chinese Dental Practitioners: a Crosssectional Study. CB1 Promotes Osteogenic Differentiation Potential of Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells by Enhancing Mitochondrial Transfer of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Establishment of an Animal Model of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Invading the Mandible. GREM1 Negatively Regulates Osteo-/Dentinogenic Differentiation of Dental Pulp Stem Cells via Association with YWHAH. PHD2 shRNA-Modified Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells Facilitate Periodontal Bone Repair in Response to Inflammatory Condition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1