Adjusting the Thai version of the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III for education to screen for dementia.

IF 2.3 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurodegenerative disease management Pub Date : 2021-08-01 Epub Date: 2021-07-07 DOI:10.2217/nmt-2021-0001
Thammanard Charernboon
{"title":"Adjusting the Thai version of the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III for education to screen for dementia.","authors":"Thammanard Charernboon","doi":"10.2217/nmt-2021-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> To examine whether education adjusted cut-off points of the Thai version of the ACE-III improve diagnostic accuracy in the detection of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. <b>Materials & methods:</b> There were 172 participants consisting of 70 normal controls, 49 people with MCI and 53 patients with dementia. <b>Results:</b> To screen for MCI, the adjusted for education method yielded greater accuracy for the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AuROC) than the unadjusted method (0.9-0.92 vs 0.86). For the detection of dementia, when applying the education correction, AuROC increased from 0.87 (unadjusted) to 0.91 for the education >6 group, but there was no improvement for education ≤6 group (AuROC 0.86). <b>Conclusion:</b> The use of adjusted cut-off score for education level could increase the diagnostic accuracy of the test.</p>","PeriodicalId":19114,"journal":{"name":"Neurodegenerative disease management","volume":"11 4","pages":"299-305"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurodegenerative disease management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/nmt-2021-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To examine whether education adjusted cut-off points of the Thai version of the ACE-III improve diagnostic accuracy in the detection of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. Materials & methods: There were 172 participants consisting of 70 normal controls, 49 people with MCI and 53 patients with dementia. Results: To screen for MCI, the adjusted for education method yielded greater accuracy for the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AuROC) than the unadjusted method (0.9-0.92 vs 0.86). For the detection of dementia, when applying the education correction, AuROC increased from 0.87 (unadjusted) to 0.91 for the education >6 group, but there was no improvement for education ≤6 group (AuROC 0.86). Conclusion: The use of adjusted cut-off score for education level could increase the diagnostic accuracy of the test.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调整泰国版本的阿登布鲁克认知考试III教育筛查痴呆症。
目的:探讨泰国版ACE-III的教育调整截断点是否能提高轻度认知障碍(MCI)和痴呆的诊断准确性。材料与方法:172名参与者,其中70名正常对照,49名轻度认知障碍患者和53名痴呆患者。结果:为了筛查MCI,调整教育方法的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AuROC)比未调整方法的准确度更高(0.9-0.92 vs 0.86)。对于痴呆的检测,应用教育矫正时,教育程度>6组的AuROC从0.87(未经调整)增加到0.91,而教育程度≤6组的AuROC无改善(AuROC为0.86)。结论:教育程度调整分界点可提高该测试的诊断准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Neurofilament light chain: a biomarker at the crossroads of clarity and confusion for gene-directed therapies. An interdisciplinary approach to rehabilitation in Parkinson's disease: case series. Patient-reported benefits from nabiximols treatment in multiple sclerosis-related spasticity exceed conventional measures. Welcome to Volume 14 of Neurodegenerative Disease Management. Measuring fatigue in people with multiple sclerosis - which questionnaire should be used? A Plain Language Summary of Publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1