An Analysis of Prehospital Blood Administration in the Indo-Pacific Command.

Sarah A Johnson, Cheyenne E Carr, Andrew D Fisher, James Bynum, Ronnie Hill, Steven G Schauer
{"title":"An Analysis of Prehospital Blood Administration in the Indo-Pacific Command.","authors":"Sarah A Johnson,&nbsp;Cheyenne E Carr,&nbsp;Andrew D Fisher,&nbsp;James Bynum,&nbsp;Ronnie Hill,&nbsp;Steven G Schauer","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Blood products are often a life-saving intervention for both traumatic and medical indications. The United States Indo-Pacific Command (INDOPACOM) is the largest Geographic Combat Command (GCC). Procurement of blood products that meet the US military healthcare standards throughout this region is challenging. Yet, the frequency to which this life-saving intervention is administered remains unclear. We seek to describe blood product administration throughout INDOPACOM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a secondary analysis of a previously described dataset from the US Transportation Command (TRANSCOM) Regulating Command and Control and Evacuation System (TRAC2ES) from 2008 to 2018.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2008 and 2018, there were 4,217 cases in TRAC2ES originating within INDOPACOM, of which 173 (4%) cases involved blood product transfusion. The largest percentage for patients receiving a blood transfusion was 19-29 years old (29%), followed by patients under a year (21%). Most (66%) of the patients classified as male. Almost half of the patients (49%) were dependents of members of service in parallel with the young patient ages. Anemia (23%) and trauma (20%) , mostly non-combat related, were the largest proportions of indications. The common blood product used was packed red cells (72%) followed by fresh frozen plasma (16%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Blood products were administered to nearly 1 out of every 25 patients transported within INDOPACOM, which highlights the need for reliable methods for obtaining and maintaining blood products. Given INDOPACOM's vast area of responsibility and possibility for a peer-to-peer war, finding optimal methods to transport and store blood and blood products is imperative.</p>","PeriodicalId":74148,"journal":{"name":"Medical journal (Fort Sam Houston, Tex.)","volume":" PB 8-21-04/05/06","pages":"66-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical journal (Fort Sam Houston, Tex.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Blood products are often a life-saving intervention for both traumatic and medical indications. The United States Indo-Pacific Command (INDOPACOM) is the largest Geographic Combat Command (GCC). Procurement of blood products that meet the US military healthcare standards throughout this region is challenging. Yet, the frequency to which this life-saving intervention is administered remains unclear. We seek to describe blood product administration throughout INDOPACOM.

Methods: This is a secondary analysis of a previously described dataset from the US Transportation Command (TRANSCOM) Regulating Command and Control and Evacuation System (TRAC2ES) from 2008 to 2018.

Results: Between 2008 and 2018, there were 4,217 cases in TRAC2ES originating within INDOPACOM, of which 173 (4%) cases involved blood product transfusion. The largest percentage for patients receiving a blood transfusion was 19-29 years old (29%), followed by patients under a year (21%). Most (66%) of the patients classified as male. Almost half of the patients (49%) were dependents of members of service in parallel with the young patient ages. Anemia (23%) and trauma (20%) , mostly non-combat related, were the largest proportions of indications. The common blood product used was packed red cells (72%) followed by fresh frozen plasma (16%).

Conclusions: Blood products were administered to nearly 1 out of every 25 patients transported within INDOPACOM, which highlights the need for reliable methods for obtaining and maintaining blood products. Given INDOPACOM's vast area of responsibility and possibility for a peer-to-peer war, finding optimal methods to transport and store blood and blood products is imperative.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印太司令部院前血液管理分析
背景:血液制品通常是创伤和医学指征的救命干预手段。美国印太司令部(INDOPACOM)是最大的地理作战司令部(GCC)。在整个地区采购符合美国军事医疗标准的血液制品具有挑战性。然而,实施这种拯救生命的干预措施的频率仍不清楚。我们试图描述整个INDOPACOM的血液制品管理。方法:这是对2008年至2018年美国运输司令部(TRANSCOM)调节指挥、控制和疏散系统(TRAC2ES)先前描述的数据集的二次分析。结果:2008年至2018年,共有4217例源自INDOPACOM的TRAC2ES病例,其中173例(4%)涉及血液制品输血。接受输血的患者比例最大的是19-29岁(29%),其次是一岁以下的患者(21%)。大多数(66%)患者为男性。几乎一半的患者(49%)是与年轻患者年龄相仿的服务人员的家属。贫血(23%)和创伤(20%),大多数与战斗无关,是适应症的最大比例。常用的血液制品是填充红细胞(72%),其次是新鲜冷冻血浆(16%)。结论:在INDOPACOM内运输的每25名患者中,有近1人使用了血液制品,这突出表明需要可靠的方法来获取和维持血液制品。考虑到INDOPACOM的广泛责任范围和点对点战争的可能性,寻找运输和储存血液和血液制品的最佳方法势在必行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Closing the Trauma and Critical Care Gap: A Paradigm Shift through Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality. MRI Predictive Model's Utility in a Recruit Training Environment for Tibia Stress Fractures. Platelet-Rich Plasma Improves Strength and Speed of Recovery in an Active-Duty Soldier with Isolated Injury to the Lateral Collateral Ligament of the Knee: A Case Report. The Continued Misadventures of Intentional C4 Ingestion: A Case Cluster. Impact of a Novel Biplane User Interface on Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Access Performance: A Prospective, Randomized, Crossover Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1