Change in EEG Activity is Associated with a Decrease in Tinnitus Awareness after rTMS.

Frontiers in neurology and neuroscience research Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-05-17
G Carter, R B Govindan, G Brown, C Heimann, H Hayes, J C Thostenson, J Dornhoffer, T Brozoski, T A Kimbrell, A Hayar, B Shihabuddin, G A James, E Garcia-Rill, P R Padala, M Mennemeier
{"title":"Change in EEG Activity is Associated with a Decrease in Tinnitus Awareness after rTMS.","authors":"G Carter,&nbsp;R B Govindan,&nbsp;G Brown,&nbsp;C Heimann,&nbsp;H Hayes,&nbsp;J C Thostenson,&nbsp;J Dornhoffer,&nbsp;T Brozoski,&nbsp;T A Kimbrell,&nbsp;A Hayar,&nbsp;B Shihabuddin,&nbsp;G A James,&nbsp;E Garcia-Rill,&nbsp;P R Padala,&nbsp;M Mennemeier","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine how 1Hz and 10Hz rTMS temporarily influence ratings of tinnitus loudness, annoyance, and awareness. The thalamocortical dysrhythmia (TCD) model of tinnitus was tested by examining changes in spectral power and coherence of resting state EEGs from baseline to each phase of treatment and correlating these data with change in tinnitus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nineteen participants completed a double-blind, placebo (sham rTMS) controlled, within-subjects study with crossover between the two active rTMS treatment conditions. An imposed order effect, sham rTMS first, eliminated drift of active treatment into the placebo condition. The primary outcome measures were analogue ratings of tinnitus loudness, annoyance, and awareness, assessed repeatedly at baseline and during treatment, and 64 channel, resting state EEGs collected at baseline and the end of each treatment phase. Active rTMS consisted of 1800 pulses at 110% of motor threshold over temporal cortex delivered at 1Hz and 10Hz over four days. The research design also examined the effect of rTMS immediately following stimulation, regression to the mean in tinnitus ratings made over multiple days, and differences between treatment responders and non-responders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no immediate effect of rTMS on tinnitus during a single rTMS session. Regression to the mean in tinnitus ratings occurred over three days of baseline and four days of treatment (both sham and active rTMS). After accounting for regression to the mean in the statistical model, 1Hz rTMS led to a significant decrease in tinnitus awareness from baseline and 10Hz rTMS trended in the same direction, whereas sham rTMS showed little change from baseline other than regression to the mean. Changes from baseline in spectral power of the resting state EEG provided partial support for predictions based on TCD model of tinnitus for active 1 and 10Hz rTMS but not sham rTMS. However, only an increase in beta coherence correlated significantly with a decrease in tinnitus awareness. Changes in the EEG were robust in treatment responders but absent among non-responders and during sham rTMS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A positive response to rTMS for tinnitus is associated with an rTMS-induced change in beta coherence of the EEG. Increased beta coherence may be a biomarker of the rTMS effect; a \"top-down\" modulation of the EEG that promotes habituation to tinnitus. Participants whose tinnitus did not improve after rTMS did not show any changes in the EEG.</p>","PeriodicalId":93097,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in neurology and neuroscience research","volume":"2 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8277104/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in neurology and neuroscience research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/5/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine how 1Hz and 10Hz rTMS temporarily influence ratings of tinnitus loudness, annoyance, and awareness. The thalamocortical dysrhythmia (TCD) model of tinnitus was tested by examining changes in spectral power and coherence of resting state EEGs from baseline to each phase of treatment and correlating these data with change in tinnitus.

Methods: Nineteen participants completed a double-blind, placebo (sham rTMS) controlled, within-subjects study with crossover between the two active rTMS treatment conditions. An imposed order effect, sham rTMS first, eliminated drift of active treatment into the placebo condition. The primary outcome measures were analogue ratings of tinnitus loudness, annoyance, and awareness, assessed repeatedly at baseline and during treatment, and 64 channel, resting state EEGs collected at baseline and the end of each treatment phase. Active rTMS consisted of 1800 pulses at 110% of motor threshold over temporal cortex delivered at 1Hz and 10Hz over four days. The research design also examined the effect of rTMS immediately following stimulation, regression to the mean in tinnitus ratings made over multiple days, and differences between treatment responders and non-responders.

Results: There was no immediate effect of rTMS on tinnitus during a single rTMS session. Regression to the mean in tinnitus ratings occurred over three days of baseline and four days of treatment (both sham and active rTMS). After accounting for regression to the mean in the statistical model, 1Hz rTMS led to a significant decrease in tinnitus awareness from baseline and 10Hz rTMS trended in the same direction, whereas sham rTMS showed little change from baseline other than regression to the mean. Changes from baseline in spectral power of the resting state EEG provided partial support for predictions based on TCD model of tinnitus for active 1 and 10Hz rTMS but not sham rTMS. However, only an increase in beta coherence correlated significantly with a decrease in tinnitus awareness. Changes in the EEG were robust in treatment responders but absent among non-responders and during sham rTMS.

Conclusions: A positive response to rTMS for tinnitus is associated with an rTMS-induced change in beta coherence of the EEG. Increased beta coherence may be a biomarker of the rTMS effect; a "top-down" modulation of the EEG that promotes habituation to tinnitus. Participants whose tinnitus did not improve after rTMS did not show any changes in the EEG.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脑电图活动的变化与rTMS后耳鸣意识的减少有关。
目的:探讨1Hz和10Hz rTMS对耳鸣响度、烦恼和意识评分的暂时性影响。通过检查静息状态脑电图从基线到治疗的每个阶段的频谱功率和一致性的变化,并将这些数据与耳鸣的变化相关联,对耳鸣的丘脑皮质节律异常(TCD)模型进行了测试。方法:19名参与者完成了一项双盲、安慰剂(假rTMS)控制的受试者内研究,两种有效rTMS治疗条件之间存在交叉。一种强加的顺序效应,即伪rTMS优先,消除了积极治疗向安慰剂状态的漂移。主要结局指标是在基线和治疗期间反复评估耳鸣响度、烦恼和意识的模拟评分,以及在基线和每个治疗阶段结束时收集的64通道静息状态脑电图。主动rTMS包括在4天内以1Hz和10Hz的频率在颞叶皮层上以110%的运动阈值传递1800个脉冲。研究设计还检查了刺激后立即使用rTMS的效果,多日耳鸣评分回归平均值,以及治疗反应者和无反应者之间的差异。结果:在单次rTMS治疗期间,rTMS对耳鸣没有直接影响。耳鸣评分回归平均值发生在基线3天和治疗4天(假和活动rTMS)。在统计模型中考虑回归均值后,1Hz rTMS导致耳鸣意识较基线显著下降,10Hz rTMS趋势相同,而假性rTMS除了回归均值外,与基线几乎没有变化。静息状态脑电图谱功率与基线的变化部分支持基于TCD模型预测的1 hz和10Hz rTMS的耳鸣,但不支持假性rTMS。然而,只有β连贯性的增加与耳鸣意识的降低显著相关。脑电图的变化在治疗应答者中很明显,但在无应答者和假性rTMS期间没有变化。结论:rTMS治疗耳鸣的阳性反应与rTMS诱导的脑电图β相干性变化有关。增强的相干性可能是rTMS效应的生物标志物;一种“自上而下”的脑电图调节,促进耳鸣的习惯。耳鸣在rTMS后没有改善的参与者在脑电图上没有表现出任何变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of Depression among Stroke Survivors in India: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Comparison of Language and Memory Lateralization by Functional MRI and Wada Test in Epilepsy. Change in EEG Activity is Associated with a Decrease in Tinnitus Awareness after rTMS. Lateralized Effects in Troxler Fading and Parvo and Magnocellular Processing Tasks after Localized 1Hz rTMS. N-Acetylaspartate Biomarker of Stroke Recovery: A Case Series Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1