Developmental differences in reactivation underlying self-derivation of new knowledge through memory integration

IF 3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY Cognitive Psychology Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2021.101413
Hilary E. Miller-Goldwater, Lucy M. Cronin-Golomb, Blaire M. Porter, Patricia J. Bauer
{"title":"Developmental differences in reactivation underlying self-derivation of new knowledge through memory integration","authors":"Hilary E. Miller-Goldwater,&nbsp;Lucy M. Cronin-Golomb,&nbsp;Blaire M. Porter,&nbsp;Patricia J. Bauer","doi":"10.1016/j.cogpsych.2021.101413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Self-derivation of novel facts through integration of memory content is fundamental to acquiring new knowledge and a means of building a semantic knowledge base. It involves combining memory content acquired across separate episodes of learning to generate new knowledge that was not explicitly taught in either episode. To self-derive, one needs to reactivate earlier learned memory content upon exposure to related content and then integrate the learning episodes. Previous research found developmental differences in the conditions under which integration occurs. Adults spontaneously integrate whereas 7- to 9-year-old children seemingly integrate only upon direct tests that verbally prompt for integration. Yet it is unclear whether children engage in the preliminary process of reactivation prior to the direct tests. To address this gap in the current research, we developed an eye-tracking paradigm and tested whether adults and 7- to 9-year-old children engage in the process of reactivation prior to direct tests. The direct tests verbally prompted for integration of memory content requiring self-derivation through both open-ended and forced-choice formats. Both adults and children engaged in reactivation prior to the direct tests. The extent of their reactivation predicted their performance on the direct tests. However, adults showed stronger evidence of reactivation and performed better than children on the direct tests. This work contributes to understandings of developmental differences in the underlying processes involved in the development of new knowledge.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50669,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Psychology","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 101413"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2021.101413","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010028521000360","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Self-derivation of novel facts through integration of memory content is fundamental to acquiring new knowledge and a means of building a semantic knowledge base. It involves combining memory content acquired across separate episodes of learning to generate new knowledge that was not explicitly taught in either episode. To self-derive, one needs to reactivate earlier learned memory content upon exposure to related content and then integrate the learning episodes. Previous research found developmental differences in the conditions under which integration occurs. Adults spontaneously integrate whereas 7- to 9-year-old children seemingly integrate only upon direct tests that verbally prompt for integration. Yet it is unclear whether children engage in the preliminary process of reactivation prior to the direct tests. To address this gap in the current research, we developed an eye-tracking paradigm and tested whether adults and 7- to 9-year-old children engage in the process of reactivation prior to direct tests. The direct tests verbally prompted for integration of memory content requiring self-derivation through both open-ended and forced-choice formats. Both adults and children engaged in reactivation prior to the direct tests. The extent of their reactivation predicted their performance on the direct tests. However, adults showed stronger evidence of reactivation and performed better than children on the direct tests. This work contributes to understandings of developmental differences in the underlying processes involved in the development of new knowledge.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过记忆整合的新知识自我衍生的再激活的发展差异
通过整合记忆内容,对新事实进行自我推导是获取新知识的基础,也是构建语义知识库的手段。它包括将在不同的学习阶段获得的记忆内容结合起来,产生在任何一个阶段都没有明确教授的新知识。为了自我推导,一个人需要在接触相关内容时重新激活先前学习过的记忆内容,然后整合学习情节。先前的研究发现,整合发生的条件存在发育差异。成年人自发地融入社会,而7到9岁的儿童似乎只有在直接的口头提示下才能融入社会。然而,目前尚不清楚儿童在直接测试之前是否参与了重新激活的初步过程。为了解决当前研究中的这一空白,我们开发了一种眼动追踪范式,并在直接测试之前测试了成人和7至9岁的儿童是否参与了再激活过程。直接测试口头提示需要通过开放式和强制选择格式进行自派生的内存内容的集成。成人和儿童在直接测试前都进行了再激活。他们的再激活程度预测了他们在直接测试中的表现。然而,成年人在直接测试中表现出更强的再激活证据,并且表现得比儿童更好。这项工作有助于理解新知识发展中涉及的潜在过程中的发展差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Psychology
Cognitive Psychology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
29
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Cognitive Psychology is concerned with advances in the study of attention, memory, language processing, perception, problem solving, and thinking. Cognitive Psychology specializes in extensive articles that have a major impact on cognitive theory and provide new theoretical advances. Research Areas include: • Artificial intelligence • Developmental psychology • Linguistics • Neurophysiology • Social psychology.
期刊最新文献
Updating of information in working memory: Time course and consequences. In the United States, children are more likely than adults to condone discrimination. Free time, sharper mind: A computational dive into working memory improvement Editorial Board Building compressed causal models of the world
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1