Validation of the Multidimensional Inventory of Infidelity (IMIN) in Colombian Population.

IF 1.2 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Psychological Research Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.21500/20112084.4710
Fernando Riveros-Munévar, Luis Enrique Prieto-Patiño, Laura Marroquín-Ortegón, Mariana Cardona-Rodríguez, Camilo Delgado-Zapata, Yuri Rodriguez-Nino
{"title":"Validation of the Multidimensional Inventory of Infidelity (IMIN) in Colombian Population.","authors":"Fernando Riveros-Munévar,&nbsp;Luis Enrique Prieto-Patiño,&nbsp;Laura Marroquín-Ortegón,&nbsp;Mariana Cardona-Rodríguez,&nbsp;Camilo Delgado-Zapata,&nbsp;Yuri Rodriguez-Nino","doi":"10.21500/20112084.4710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Infidelity is a problem that entails psychological and physical consequences in humankind (Buss, 2016; González et al., 2009; Shackelford et al., 2003); thus, indicating the importance of measuring infidelity construct. The objective of the study was to determine the validity and reliability of the Multidimensional Infidelity Inventory (IMIN) for Colombian samples. For this, the instrument was applied to 674 Colombian participants, 224 men (33.28%) and 449 women (66.71%), with ages between 18 and 81 years (M = 25.11; SD = 10.56), carrying out exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory, and internal consistency for each subscale. In general, in the Motives to infidelity scale, three factors were found that explained 66.74% of the total accumulated variance; three factors were found in the Trend to Infidelity scale, explaining 65.02% of the total variance; in the sub-scale of Beliefs to infidelity, five factors were obtained, explaining 58.33% of the accumulated variance; and in the sub-scale of Consequences of infidelity, two clearly constituted factors were found, which explain 57.58% of the accumulated variance. All of them had confirmatory models with adequate levels of goodness of fit, adequate Cronbach alpha indicators, item-item, and item-test correlations, in addition to concordance with the original proposal of the instrument.</p>","PeriodicalId":46542,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychological Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2f/ea/2011-2084-ijpr-14-01-33.PMC8297579.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychological Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.4710","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Infidelity is a problem that entails psychological and physical consequences in humankind (Buss, 2016; González et al., 2009; Shackelford et al., 2003); thus, indicating the importance of measuring infidelity construct. The objective of the study was to determine the validity and reliability of the Multidimensional Infidelity Inventory (IMIN) for Colombian samples. For this, the instrument was applied to 674 Colombian participants, 224 men (33.28%) and 449 women (66.71%), with ages between 18 and 81 years (M = 25.11; SD = 10.56), carrying out exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory, and internal consistency for each subscale. In general, in the Motives to infidelity scale, three factors were found that explained 66.74% of the total accumulated variance; three factors were found in the Trend to Infidelity scale, explaining 65.02% of the total variance; in the sub-scale of Beliefs to infidelity, five factors were obtained, explaining 58.33% of the accumulated variance; and in the sub-scale of Consequences of infidelity, two clearly constituted factors were found, which explain 57.58% of the accumulated variance. All of them had confirmatory models with adequate levels of goodness of fit, adequate Cronbach alpha indicators, item-item, and item-test correlations, in addition to concordance with the original proposal of the instrument.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哥伦比亚人口多维不忠量表(IMIN)的验证。
不忠是一个会给人类带来心理和生理后果的问题(Buss, 2016;González等,2009;Shackelford et al., 2003);由此可见,测量不忠结构的重要性。本研究的目的是确定多维不忠量表(IMIN)对哥伦比亚样本的有效性和可靠性。为此,该工具应用于674名哥伦比亚参与者,224名男性(33.28%)和449名女性(66.71%),年龄在18至81岁之间(M = 25.11;SD = 10.56),对各子量表进行探索性因子分析、验证性和内部一致性。总体而言,在不忠动机量表中,三个因素解释了66.74%的总累积方差;不忠倾向量表存在3个因素,解释总方差的65.02%;在“信念到不忠”子量表中,获得了5个因素,解释了58.33%的累积方差;在出轨后果子量表中,发现了两个明确构成的因素,解释了57.58%的累积方差。所有的验证模型都具有足够的拟合优度,足够的Cronbach alpha指标,项目-项目和项目-测试相关性,除了与仪器的原始建议一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Psychological Research
International Journal of Psychological Research PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
22
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Psychological Research (Int.j.psychol.res) is the Faculty of Psychology’s official publication of San Buenaventura University in Medellin, Colombia. Int.j.psychol.res relies on a vast and diverse theoretical and thematic publishing material, which includes unpublished productions of diverse psychological issues and behavioral human areas such as psychiatry, neurosciences, mental health, among others.
期刊最新文献
Functional Connectivity of Moral Cognition and Traits of Psychopathy in Youth: An Analysis of the Scientific Literature Behavioral Changes after Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on the Frontal Systems Behavior Scale Intimate partner violence attitudes: Who tolerates the most? Violencia en el noviazgo en estudiantes universitarios: validación de la escala DVQ-VP en Bolivia Brief Version of the Revised-Abbreviated Eysenck Personality Questionnaire in a Spanish Young Adult Population
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1