Cost and greenhouse gas emissions of current, healthy, flexitarian and vegan diets in Aotearoa (New Zealand).

IF 3.3 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health Pub Date : 2021-06-09 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjnph-2021-000262
Bruce Kidd, Sally Mackay, Stefanie Vandevijvere, Boyd Swinburn
{"title":"Cost and greenhouse gas emissions of current, healthy, flexitarian and vegan diets in Aotearoa (New Zealand).","authors":"Bruce Kidd,&nbsp;Sally Mackay,&nbsp;Stefanie Vandevijvere,&nbsp;Boyd Swinburn","doi":"10.1136/bmjnph-2021-000262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the costs and climate impact (greenhouse gas emissions) associated with current and healthy diets and two healthy and environmentally friendly dietary patterns: flexitarian and vegan.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Modelling study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Aotearoa (New Zealand).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The distribution of the cost and climate impact (kgCO<sub>2</sub>e/kg of food per fortnight) of 2 weekly current, healthy, vegan and flexitarian household diets was modelled using a list of commonly consumed foods, a set of quantity/serves constraints for each, and constraints for food group and nutrient intakes based on dietary guidelines (Eating and Activity Guidelines for healthy diets and EAT-Lancet reference diet for vegan and flexitarian diets) or nutrition survey data (current diets).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The iterative creation of 210-237 household dietary intakes for each dietary scenario was achieved using computer software adapted for the purpose (DIETCOST). There were stepwise differences between diet scenarios (p<0.001) with the <i>current</i> diet having the lowest mean cost in New Zealand Dollars (NZ$584 (95% CI NZ$580 to NZ$588)) per fortnight for a family of four) but highest mean climate impact (597 kgCO<sub>2</sub>e (95% CI 590 to 604 kgCO<sub>2</sub>e)), followed by the healthy diet (NZ$637 (95% CI NZ$632 to NZ$642), 452 kgCO<sub>2</sub>e (95% CI 446 to 458 kgCO<sub>2</sub>e)), the flexitarian diet (NZ$728 (95% CI NZ$723 to NZ$734), 263 kgCO<sub>2</sub>e (95% CI 261 to 265 kgCO<sub>2</sub>e)) and the vegan diet, which had the highest mean cost and lowest mean climate impact (NZ$789, (95% CI NZ$784 to NZ$794), 203 kgCO<sub>2</sub>e (95% CI 201 to 204 kgCO<sub>2</sub>e)). There was a negative relationship between cost and climate impact across diets and a positive relationship within diets.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Moving from current diets towards sustainable healthy diets (SHDs) will reduce climate impact but generally at a higher cost to households. The results reflect trade-offs, with the larger constraints placed on diets, the greater cost and factors such as nutritional adequacy, variety, cost and low-emissions foods being considered. Further monitoring and policies are needed to support population transitions that are country specific from current diets to SHD.</p>","PeriodicalId":36307,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/bmjnph-2021-000262","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjnph-2021-000262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Objective: To compare the costs and climate impact (greenhouse gas emissions) associated with current and healthy diets and two healthy and environmentally friendly dietary patterns: flexitarian and vegan.

Design: Modelling study.

Setting: Aotearoa (New Zealand).

Main outcome measures: The distribution of the cost and climate impact (kgCO2e/kg of food per fortnight) of 2 weekly current, healthy, vegan and flexitarian household diets was modelled using a list of commonly consumed foods, a set of quantity/serves constraints for each, and constraints for food group and nutrient intakes based on dietary guidelines (Eating and Activity Guidelines for healthy diets and EAT-Lancet reference diet for vegan and flexitarian diets) or nutrition survey data (current diets).

Results: The iterative creation of 210-237 household dietary intakes for each dietary scenario was achieved using computer software adapted for the purpose (DIETCOST). There were stepwise differences between diet scenarios (p<0.001) with the current diet having the lowest mean cost in New Zealand Dollars (NZ$584 (95% CI NZ$580 to NZ$588)) per fortnight for a family of four) but highest mean climate impact (597 kgCO2e (95% CI 590 to 604 kgCO2e)), followed by the healthy diet (NZ$637 (95% CI NZ$632 to NZ$642), 452 kgCO2e (95% CI 446 to 458 kgCO2e)), the flexitarian diet (NZ$728 (95% CI NZ$723 to NZ$734), 263 kgCO2e (95% CI 261 to 265 kgCO2e)) and the vegan diet, which had the highest mean cost and lowest mean climate impact (NZ$789, (95% CI NZ$784 to NZ$794), 203 kgCO2e (95% CI 201 to 204 kgCO2e)). There was a negative relationship between cost and climate impact across diets and a positive relationship within diets.

Conclusions: Moving from current diets towards sustainable healthy diets (SHDs) will reduce climate impact but generally at a higher cost to households. The results reflect trade-offs, with the larger constraints placed on diets, the greater cost and factors such as nutritional adequacy, variety, cost and low-emissions foods being considered. Further monitoring and policies are needed to support population transitions that are country specific from current diets to SHD.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
奥特罗阿(新西兰)目前健康、灵活和纯素饮食的成本和温室气体排放。
目的:比较当前健康饮食和两种健康环保的饮食模式:弹性素食和纯素食的成本和气候影响(温室气体排放)。设计:模型研究。环境:奥特罗阿(新西兰)。主要评价指标:每周两周的当前、健康、纯素和弹性素食家庭饮食的成本分布和气候影响(每两周的公斤二氧化碳当量/公斤食物)是通过使用常用食物列表、每种食物的一组数量/份量限制、以及基于饮食指南(健康饮食和活动指南以及纯素和弹性素食饮食的EAT-Lancet参考饮食)或营养调查数据(当前饮食)的食物组和营养摄入量限制来建模的。结果:采用DIETCOST计算机软件,实现了每种膳食方案210-237个家庭膳食摄入量的迭代生成。有逐步的差异饮食场景(pcurrent饮食指的是成本最低的新西兰元(584新西兰元(95% CI 580新西兰元588新西兰元))每两周为一个四口之家)但最高意味着气候影响(597 kgCO2e (95% CI 590到604 kgCO2e)),紧随其后的是健康的饮食(637新西兰元(95% CI 632新西兰元642新西兰元),452年kgCO2e (95% CI 446到458 kgCO2e)),弹性素食者饮食(728新西兰元(95% CI 723新西兰元734新西兰元),263年kgCO2e (95% CI 261到265 kgCO2e))和素食,平均成本最高,平均气候影响最低(789新西兰元,(95% CI NZ$784至794),203公斤二氧化碳当量(95% CI 201至204公斤二氧化碳当量))。饮食成本与气候影响之间存在负相关关系,饮食内部存在正相关关系。结论:从目前的饮食转向可持续健康饮食(SHDs)将减少气候影响,但通常会给家庭带来更高的成本。结果反映了权衡,对饮食的限制越大,成本越高,营养充足、品种、成本和低排放食品等因素也被考虑在内。需要进一步的监测和政策来支持各国人口从当前饮食向可持续发展饮食的转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health Nursing-Nutrition and Dietetics
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Landscape analysis of environmental, social and governance (ESG) investing metrics for consumer nutrition and health in the food and beverage sector. Maternal prenatal, with or without postpartum, vitamin D3 supplementation does not improve maternal iron status at delivery or infant iron status at 6 months of age: secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial Effects of behavioural change communication (BCC) on menstrual hygiene practices among urban school adolescent girls: a pilot study Physiotherapy-led telehealth and exercise intervention to improve mobility in older people receiving aged care services (TOP UP): protocol for a randomised controlled type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial Effects of a 5-week intake of erythritol and xylitol on vascular function, abdominal fat and glucose tolerance in humans with obesity: a pilot trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1