Effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on tumor cell viability: a meta-analysis of in vitro randomized controlled experiments.

IF 1.6 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOLOGY Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine Pub Date : 2021-10-02 Epub Date: 2021-07-26 DOI:10.1080/15368378.2021.1958341
Guangzhou An, Meilun Shen, Juan Guo, Xia Miao, Yuntao Jing, Keying Zhang, Ling Guo, Junling Xing
{"title":"Effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on tumor cell viability: a meta-analysis of in vitro randomized controlled experiments.","authors":"Guangzhou An,&nbsp;Meilun Shen,&nbsp;Juan Guo,&nbsp;Xia Miao,&nbsp;Yuntao Jing,&nbsp;Keying Zhang,&nbsp;Ling Guo,&nbsp;Junling Xing","doi":"10.1080/15368378.2021.1958341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Malignant tumor treatment remains a big challenge till now, and expanding literature indicated that pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) is promising in tumor treatment with the advantage of safety and being economical, but it is still controversial on whether PEMF could affect the tumor cell viability. Therefore, we conducted the meta-analysis to evaluate effects of PEMF on tumor cell viability. The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies published up to February 2021. Studies on the direct effects of PEMF on tumor cell viability, determined using colorimetric analysis, were included. Two authors extracted the data and completed the quality assessment. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate the absorbance values and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using random-effects models. Seven studies, including 32 randomized controlled experiments, were analyzed. Compared with the control group, tumor cell viability in the PEMF exposure group was obviously lower (SMD, -0.67; 95% CI: -1.12 to -0.22). The subgroup meta-analysis results showed that PEMF significantly reduced epithelial cancer cell viability (SMD, -0.58; 95% CI: -0.92 to -0.23) but had no influence on stromal tumor cell viability (SMD, -0.93; 95% CI: -0.21 to 0.15). Our study demonstrated that PEMF could inhibit tumor cell proliferation to some extent, but the risk of bias and high heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> > 75%) weakened the strength of the conclusions drawn from the analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":50544,"journal":{"name":"Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine","volume":"40 4","pages":"467-474"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15368378.2021.1958341","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15368378.2021.1958341","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Malignant tumor treatment remains a big challenge till now, and expanding literature indicated that pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) is promising in tumor treatment with the advantage of safety and being economical, but it is still controversial on whether PEMF could affect the tumor cell viability. Therefore, we conducted the meta-analysis to evaluate effects of PEMF on tumor cell viability. The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies published up to February 2021. Studies on the direct effects of PEMF on tumor cell viability, determined using colorimetric analysis, were included. Two authors extracted the data and completed the quality assessment. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate the absorbance values and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using random-effects models. Seven studies, including 32 randomized controlled experiments, were analyzed. Compared with the control group, tumor cell viability in the PEMF exposure group was obviously lower (SMD, -0.67; 95% CI: -1.12 to -0.22). The subgroup meta-analysis results showed that PEMF significantly reduced epithelial cancer cell viability (SMD, -0.58; 95% CI: -0.92 to -0.23) but had no influence on stromal tumor cell viability (SMD, -0.93; 95% CI: -0.21 to 0.15). Our study demonstrated that PEMF could inhibit tumor cell proliferation to some extent, but the risk of bias and high heterogeneity (I2 > 75%) weakened the strength of the conclusions drawn from the analysis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脉冲电磁场对肿瘤细胞活力的影响:体外随机对照实验的荟萃分析。
恶性肿瘤的治疗至今仍是一个很大的挑战,越来越多的文献表明脉冲电磁场(PEMF)在肿瘤治疗中具有安全、经济的优势,但是否会影响肿瘤细胞的生存能力仍存在争议。因此,我们进行了meta分析来评估PEMF对肿瘤细胞活力的影响。检索PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science和Cochrane Library数据库,检索截至2021年2月发表的研究。包括使用比色分析测定的PEMF对肿瘤细胞活力的直接影响的研究。两位作者提取数据并完成质量评估。采用随机效应模型进行meta分析,计算吸光度值和95%置信区间(ci)。分析了7项研究,包括32个随机对照实验。与对照组相比,PEMF暴露组肿瘤细胞活力明显降低(SMD, -0.67;95% CI: -1.12 ~ -0.22)。亚组荟萃分析结果显示,PEMF显著降低上皮癌细胞活力(SMD, -0.58;95% CI: -0.92 ~ -0.23),但对间质肿瘤细胞活力无影响(SMD, -0.93;95% CI: -0.21 ~ 0.15)。我们的研究表明,PEMF可以在一定程度上抑制肿瘤细胞的增殖,但偏倚风险和高异质性(I2 > 75%)削弱了分析结论的强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
33
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aims & Scope: Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, publishes peer-reviewed research articles on the biological effects and medical applications of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields (from extremely-low frequency to radiofrequency). Topic examples include in vitro and in vivo studies, epidemiological investigation, mechanism and mode of interaction between non-ionizing electromagnetic fields and biological systems. In addition to publishing original articles, the journal also publishes meeting summaries and reports, and reviews on selected topics.
期刊最新文献
Vascular mechanoreceptor magnetic activation, hemodynamic evidence and potential clinical outcomes. Peristaltic flow of electromagnetic tri-hybrid Carreau nanofluid using backpropagated Levenberg-Marquardt technique: an entropy generation analysis in blood cells. The use of electromagnetic transduction therapy in patients with chronic myofascial pain: A pilot double-blinded randomised controlled trial. Evaluating PEMF vagus nerve stimulation through neck application: A randomized placebo study with volunteers. Progress in the study of the effects of electromagnetic radiation on the mood and rhythm.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1