Robot-Assisted Thyroidectomy Versus Open Thyroidectomy in the Treatment of Well Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma.

Efstathios T Pavlidis, Kyriakos K Psarras, Nikolaos G Symeonidis, Eirini-Chrysovalantou K Martzivanou, Christina C Nikolaidou, Kalliopi E Stavrati, Theodoros E Pavlidis
{"title":"Robot-Assisted Thyroidectomy Versus Open Thyroidectomy in the Treatment of Well Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma.","authors":"Efstathios T Pavlidis,&nbsp;Kyriakos K Psarras,&nbsp;Nikolaos G Symeonidis,&nbsp;Eirini-Chrysovalantou K Martzivanou,&nbsp;Christina C Nikolaidou,&nbsp;Kalliopi E Stavrati,&nbsp;Theodoros E Pavlidis","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2021.00032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The incidence of thyroid cancer has increased worldwide during the last decade, becoming the most common endocrine malignancy and accounting for 3.8% of new cancer diagnosis. Surgical resection, namely conventional thyroidectomy, remains at the frontline of therapy, as surgical outcomes are undoubtedly successful. Minimally invasive techniques gained popularity through the years, in terms of feasibility, safety, and cosmesis. However, endoscopic approach could be characterized by some limitations concerning thyroid surgery. Robotic technology with its unique features was introduced to overcome these limitations. Since then, robotic thyroidectomy has been used for both benign and malignant thyroid disease.</p><p><strong>Database: </strong>This study presents the use of robot-assisted transaxillary thyroidectomy in well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma through an extensive review of the literature in the PubMed database, including previous meta-analyses and case series.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In terms of oncological efficacy, morbidity, and quality of life, outcomes seem comparable in thyroid cancer patients undergoing either open or robotic thyroidectomy. Surgical completeness also appears similar. Moreover, the rates of locoregional recurrence and survival outcome at 5 years are similar between the former and the latter, thus confirming the oncological value of robotic thyroidectomy for differentiated thyroid cancer. In order for more surgeons to adopt robotic approaches several issues need to be resolved, namely: expansion of robotic thyroidectomy in treating larger well-differentiated carcinomas and neck dissection, equipment costs, and prolonged operation times.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":"25 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9e/00/e2021.00032.PMC8325479.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2021.00032","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: The incidence of thyroid cancer has increased worldwide during the last decade, becoming the most common endocrine malignancy and accounting for 3.8% of new cancer diagnosis. Surgical resection, namely conventional thyroidectomy, remains at the frontline of therapy, as surgical outcomes are undoubtedly successful. Minimally invasive techniques gained popularity through the years, in terms of feasibility, safety, and cosmesis. However, endoscopic approach could be characterized by some limitations concerning thyroid surgery. Robotic technology with its unique features was introduced to overcome these limitations. Since then, robotic thyroidectomy has been used for both benign and malignant thyroid disease.

Database: This study presents the use of robot-assisted transaxillary thyroidectomy in well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma through an extensive review of the literature in the PubMed database, including previous meta-analyses and case series.

Conclusion: In terms of oncological efficacy, morbidity, and quality of life, outcomes seem comparable in thyroid cancer patients undergoing either open or robotic thyroidectomy. Surgical completeness also appears similar. Moreover, the rates of locoregional recurrence and survival outcome at 5 years are similar between the former and the latter, thus confirming the oncological value of robotic thyroidectomy for differentiated thyroid cancer. In order for more surgeons to adopt robotic approaches several issues need to be resolved, namely: expansion of robotic thyroidectomy in treating larger well-differentiated carcinomas and neck dissection, equipment costs, and prolonged operation times.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器人辅助甲状腺切除术与开放式甲状腺切除术治疗高分化甲状腺癌的比较。
背景:近十年来,甲状腺癌的发病率在全球范围内呈上升趋势,成为最常见的内分泌恶性肿瘤,占新诊断癌症的3.8%。手术切除,即传统的甲状腺切除术,仍然是治疗的前沿,因为手术结果无疑是成功的。多年来,微创技术在可行性、安全性和美观性方面得到了普及。然而,内窥镜入路在甲状腺手术中可能存在一些局限性。机器人技术以其独特的特点被引入以克服这些限制。从那时起,机器人甲状腺切除术已用于良性和恶性甲状腺疾病。数据库:本研究通过广泛查阅PubMed数据库中的文献,包括先前的荟萃分析和病例系列,介绍了机器人辅助腋窝甲状腺切除术在高分化甲状腺癌中的应用。结论:在肿瘤疗效、发病率和生活质量方面,甲状腺癌患者接受开放式或机器人甲状腺切除术的结果似乎相当。手术的完全性也类似。此外,前者和后者的局部复发率和5年生存率相似,从而证实了机器人甲状腺切除术对分化型甲状腺癌的肿瘤学价值。为了使更多的外科医生采用机器人方法,需要解决几个问题,即:机器人甲状腺切除术在治疗较大的高分化癌和颈部夹层中的扩展、设备成本和延长的手术时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons publishes original scientific articles on basic science and technical topics in all the fields involved with laparoscopic, robotic, and minimally invasive surgery. CRSLS, MIS Case Reports from SLS is dedicated to the publication of Case Reports in the field of minimally invasive surgery. The journals seek to advance our understandings and practice of minimally invasive, image-guided surgery by providing a forum for all relevant disciplines and by promoting the exchange of information and ideas across specialties.
期刊最新文献
Laparoscopic Appendectomy Is Superior in Patients with Higher Fat Thickness. Minimizing Risk of Retroperitoneal Major Vascular Injury with Abdominal Wall Elevation Device during Abdominal Entry for Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery. Modified Minimally Invasive Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy with Trans-Hiatal Esophageal Transection. Learning Curve in Robotic Colorectal Surgery. Outcomes of Bilateral Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Dual-Mesh Laparoscopic TEP Technique.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1