An analytical framework for group simulation model building.

IF 1.2 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Systems Pub Date : 2020-04-09 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20476965.2020.1740613
Timothy Bolt, Steffen Bayer, Maria Kapsali, Sally Brailsford
{"title":"An analytical framework for group simulation model building.","authors":"Timothy Bolt,&nbsp;Steffen Bayer,&nbsp;Maria Kapsali,&nbsp;Sally Brailsford","doi":"10.1080/20476965.2020.1740613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper presents a framework for understanding and improving the process of simulation model building involving a group of domain experts, classifying the different roles the model may play at various stages of its development. The framework consists of four different \"object roles\", defined along two dimensions: a functional dimension (boundary object vs. representational object) and a knowledge dimension (epistemic object vs. technical object). A model can take different roles during the development process, e.g. for facilitating communication, for gaining insight into the real-world system, or for experimentation and policy evaluation. The use of the framework is illustrated by two case studies in healthcare. Its relevance and applicability are examined through a survey on model use. The survey was conducted among a group of modelling consultants with experience of using both discrete-event simulation and system dynamics within the NHS, and indicated the potential usefulness of the framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":44699,"journal":{"name":"Health Systems","volume":"10 3","pages":"198-211"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20476965.2020.1740613","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20476965.2020.1740613","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper presents a framework for understanding and improving the process of simulation model building involving a group of domain experts, classifying the different roles the model may play at various stages of its development. The framework consists of four different "object roles", defined along two dimensions: a functional dimension (boundary object vs. representational object) and a knowledge dimension (epistemic object vs. technical object). A model can take different roles during the development process, e.g. for facilitating communication, for gaining insight into the real-world system, or for experimentation and policy evaluation. The use of the framework is illustrated by two case studies in healthcare. Its relevance and applicability are examined through a survey on model use. The survey was conducted among a group of modelling consultants with experience of using both discrete-event simulation and system dynamics within the NHS, and indicated the potential usefulness of the framework.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
群体仿真模型构建的分析框架。
本文提出了一个框架,用于理解和改进由领域专家组成的仿真模型构建过程,并对模型在其发展的不同阶段可能扮演的不同角色进行了分类。该框架由四个不同的“对象角色”组成,沿两个维度定义:功能维度(边界对象vs表征对象)和知识维度(认知对象vs技术对象)。在开发过程中,模型可以扮演不同的角色,例如,促进交流,获得对现实世界系统的洞察,或者用于实验和策略评估。医疗保健领域的两个案例研究说明了该框架的使用。通过对模型使用情况的调查,检验了其相关性和适用性。该调查是在一组具有在NHS内使用离散事件模拟和系统动力学经验的建模顾问中进行的,并指出了该框架的潜在有用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Systems
Health Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Adaptive vaccination and surveillance testing strategies for infectious diseases with diverse strain dynamics. Revolutionising health monitoring: IOT-Based system with machine learning classification. Leveraging quality improvement initiatives to support development of decision support tools in healthcare. Towards a solution to the global healthcare crisis: using hierarchical decomposition and theory of constraints (TOC) to address the healthcare supply chain wicked problem. A chance-constrained program for the allocation of nurses in acute home healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1