Chondroinductive Peptides for Cartilage Regeneration.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q2 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews Pub Date : 2022-08-01 Epub Date: 2021-10-18 DOI:10.1089/ten.TEB.2021.0125
Boushra Ajeeb, Handan Acar, Michael S Detamore
{"title":"Chondroinductive Peptides for Cartilage Regeneration.","authors":"Boushra Ajeeb,&nbsp;Handan Acar,&nbsp;Michael S Detamore","doi":"10.1089/ten.TEB.2021.0125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inducing and maintaining a hyaline cartilage phenotype are the greatest challenge for cartilage regeneration. Synthetic chondroinductive biomaterials might be the answer to the unmet clinical need for a safe, stable, and cost-effective material capable of inducing true hyaline cartilage formation. The past decade witnessed an emergence of peptides to achieve chondrogenesis, as peptides have the advantages of versatility, high target specificity, minimized toxicity and immunogenicity, and ease of synthesis. In this study, we review peptides as the basis for creating promising synthetic chondroinductive biomaterials for <i>in situ</i> scaffold-based cartilage regeneration. We provide a thorough review of peptides evaluated for cartilage regeneration while distinguishing between peptides reported to induce chondrogenesis independently, and peptides reported to act in synergy with other growth factors to induce cartilage regeneration. In addition, we highlight that most peptide studies have been <i>in vitro</i>, and appropriate controls are not always present. A few rigorously performed <i>in vitro</i> studies have proceeded to <i>in vivo</i> studies, but the peptides in those <i>in vivo</i> studies were mainly introduced through systemic, subcutaneous, or intra-articular injections, with a paucity of studies employing <i>in situ</i> defects with appropriate controls. Clinical translation of peptides will require the evaluation of these peptides in well-controlled <i>in vivo</i> cartilage defect studies. In the decade ahead, we may be poised to leverage peptides to design devices that are safe, reproducible, cost-efficient, and scalable biomaterials, which are themselves chondroinductive to achieve true hyaline cartilage regeneration without the need for growth factors and other small molecules. Impact statement The regeneration of articular cartilage into its original structural, functional, and organizational hyaline phenotype remains a significant problem in the tissue engineering and orthopedic community. While cell-based solutions have shown promising outcomes, there are realistic translational challenges inherent to cell therapies. Alternatively, biomaterials have been widely studied and used as scaffolds to support and facilitate cartilage regeneration; however, the key technical challenge is to independently induce cartilage regeneration. The search for chondroinductive compounds and materials is an emerging area of research with peptides at its heart, which presents a timely opportunity to review and highlight peptides with cartilage regenerative activity and to fill gaps from previous reviews. The content of this review will serve as a valuable guide for researchers pursuing the discovery of new chondroinductive peptides or looking into incorporating the most promising existing peptides in their work.</p>","PeriodicalId":23134,"journal":{"name":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"745-765"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEB.2021.0125","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Inducing and maintaining a hyaline cartilage phenotype are the greatest challenge for cartilage regeneration. Synthetic chondroinductive biomaterials might be the answer to the unmet clinical need for a safe, stable, and cost-effective material capable of inducing true hyaline cartilage formation. The past decade witnessed an emergence of peptides to achieve chondrogenesis, as peptides have the advantages of versatility, high target specificity, minimized toxicity and immunogenicity, and ease of synthesis. In this study, we review peptides as the basis for creating promising synthetic chondroinductive biomaterials for in situ scaffold-based cartilage regeneration. We provide a thorough review of peptides evaluated for cartilage regeneration while distinguishing between peptides reported to induce chondrogenesis independently, and peptides reported to act in synergy with other growth factors to induce cartilage regeneration. In addition, we highlight that most peptide studies have been in vitro, and appropriate controls are not always present. A few rigorously performed in vitro studies have proceeded to in vivo studies, but the peptides in those in vivo studies were mainly introduced through systemic, subcutaneous, or intra-articular injections, with a paucity of studies employing in situ defects with appropriate controls. Clinical translation of peptides will require the evaluation of these peptides in well-controlled in vivo cartilage defect studies. In the decade ahead, we may be poised to leverage peptides to design devices that are safe, reproducible, cost-efficient, and scalable biomaterials, which are themselves chondroinductive to achieve true hyaline cartilage regeneration without the need for growth factors and other small molecules. Impact statement The regeneration of articular cartilage into its original structural, functional, and organizational hyaline phenotype remains a significant problem in the tissue engineering and orthopedic community. While cell-based solutions have shown promising outcomes, there are realistic translational challenges inherent to cell therapies. Alternatively, biomaterials have been widely studied and used as scaffolds to support and facilitate cartilage regeneration; however, the key technical challenge is to independently induce cartilage regeneration. The search for chondroinductive compounds and materials is an emerging area of research with peptides at its heart, which presents a timely opportunity to review and highlight peptides with cartilage regenerative activity and to fill gaps from previous reviews. The content of this review will serve as a valuable guide for researchers pursuing the discovery of new chondroinductive peptides or looking into incorporating the most promising existing peptides in their work.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于软骨再生的软骨诱导肽。
诱导和维持透明软骨表型是软骨再生的最大挑战。合成软骨诱导生物材料可能是解决临床对一种安全、稳定、具有成本效益的材料的需求的答案,这种材料能够诱导真正的透明软骨形成。在过去的十年中,由于多肽具有多功能性、高靶向特异性、毒性和免疫原性最小以及易于合成等优点,出现了用于软骨形成的多肽。在这项研究中,我们回顾了肽作为创造有前途的合成软骨诱导生物材料的基础,用于原位支架软骨再生。我们对评估软骨再生的肽进行了全面的回顾,同时区分了据报道独立诱导软骨形成的肽和据报道与其他生长因子协同作用以诱导软骨再生的肽。此外,我们强调大多数肽研究都是在体外进行的,适当的对照并不总是存在。一些严格进行的体外研究已经进入了体内研究,但这些体内研究中的肽主要是通过全身、皮下或关节内注射引入的,很少有研究采用适当对照的原位缺陷。肽的临床翻译将需要在体内软骨缺损研究中对这些肽进行良好控制的评估。在未来的十年里,我们可能会利用肽来设计安全、可复制、经济、可扩展的生物材料,这些生物材料本身是软骨诱导的,可以实现真正的透明软骨再生,而不需要生长因子和其他小分子。在组织工程和矫形界,关节软骨再生到其原有的结构、功能和组织透明表型仍然是一个重要的问题。虽然基于细胞的解决方案已经显示出有希望的结果,但细胞疗法固有的现实翻译挑战。另外,生物材料已被广泛研究并用作支架来支持和促进软骨再生;然而,关键的技术挑战是独立诱导软骨再生。寻找诱导软骨的化合物和材料是一个以肽为核心的新兴研究领域,它提供了一个及时的机会来回顾和突出具有软骨再生活性的肽,并填补以往综述的空白。这篇综述的内容将为研究人员寻求新的软骨诱导肽的发现或在他们的工作中寻找最有前途的现有肽提供有价值的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews
Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
1.60%
发文量
150
期刊介绍: Tissue Engineering Reviews (Part B) meets the urgent need for high-quality review articles by presenting critical literature overviews and systematic summaries of research within the field to assess the current standing and future directions within relevant areas and technologies. Part B publishes bi-monthly.
期刊最新文献
Advances and Global Trends in Three-Dimensional Human Tissue Models for HIV Research: A Bibliometric Analysis. Advancements in Light-Sheet Fluorescence Microscopy for Three Dimensional Cellular Spheroid Imaging. Biocompatible Materials for Periodontal Regeneration: Animal Models and Treatment Outcome Assessment. Vascularized Homeostasis: The Key to Orofacial Tissue-Engineered Organoid Construction. Landscape of Tooth Regeneration Research: A Dual-Database Bibliometric Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1