Supraclavicular artery island flap for head and neck reconstruction.

Q4 Medicine Acta chirurgiae plasticae Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.48095/ccachp202152
Bayram Şahin, Murat Ulusan, Bora Başaran, Selcuk Güneş, Emre Oymak, Selahattin Genç
{"title":"Supraclavicular artery island flap for head and neck reconstruction.","authors":"Bayram Şahin,&nbsp;Murat Ulusan,&nbsp;Bora Başaran,&nbsp;Selcuk Güneş,&nbsp;Emre Oymak,&nbsp;Selahattin Genç","doi":"10.48095/ccachp202152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The ablative surgical resection has a critical importance for achieving better oncological outcomes for patients with head and neck cancer. However, radical surgical resections reveal the reconstruction requirement of complex anatomical structures. Microvascular free flaps have been recommended as a gold standard treatment choice for head and neck reconstruction following definitive oncological surgery. The supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) is a thin and reliable fasciocutaneous pedicled flap that is simple and quick to harvest.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 19 patients who underwent head and neck reconstruction with SCAIF were included in this study. The SCAIF was used for the reconstruction of oncological defects in 17 patients while it was used for the reconstruction of a skin defect on the lower face following radiotherapy in 1 patient and for cervical open wound (blast injury) closure in 1 patient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were neither intraoperative nor postoperative major complications in any patient. The SCAIF has been used successfully in 18 of 19 patients for head and neck reconstructive surgery. Partial necrosis of the skin was detected in 1 patient (5.3%) only, while a total flap failure has not occurred in any patient. The partial skin necrosis was seen in an area of 1.5 cm of the distal end of the flap and was managed conservatively with local wound care. Wound dehiscence has not appeared in the flap donor area in any patient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SCAIF constitutes a good alternative to free flaps, providing almost equivalent functional results and requiring less operative time and surgical effort.</p>","PeriodicalId":7098,"journal":{"name":"Acta chirurgiae plasticae","volume":"63 2","pages":"52-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta chirurgiae plasticae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48095/ccachp202152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The ablative surgical resection has a critical importance for achieving better oncological outcomes for patients with head and neck cancer. However, radical surgical resections reveal the reconstruction requirement of complex anatomical structures. Microvascular free flaps have been recommended as a gold standard treatment choice for head and neck reconstruction following definitive oncological surgery. The supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) is a thin and reliable fasciocutaneous pedicled flap that is simple and quick to harvest.

Material and methods: A total of 19 patients who underwent head and neck reconstruction with SCAIF were included in this study. The SCAIF was used for the reconstruction of oncological defects in 17 patients while it was used for the reconstruction of a skin defect on the lower face following radiotherapy in 1 patient and for cervical open wound (blast injury) closure in 1 patient.

Results: There were neither intraoperative nor postoperative major complications in any patient. The SCAIF has been used successfully in 18 of 19 patients for head and neck reconstructive surgery. Partial necrosis of the skin was detected in 1 patient (5.3%) only, while a total flap failure has not occurred in any patient. The partial skin necrosis was seen in an area of 1.5 cm of the distal end of the flap and was managed conservatively with local wound care. Wound dehiscence has not appeared in the flap donor area in any patient.

Conclusion: The SCAIF constitutes a good alternative to free flaps, providing almost equivalent functional results and requiring less operative time and surgical effort.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
锁骨上动脉岛状皮瓣用于头颈部重建术。
背景:对头颈癌患者进行消融手术切除对于获得更好的肿瘤预后至关重要。然而,根治性手术切除揭示了复杂解剖结构的重建需求。微血管游离皮瓣被推荐为头颈部重建的金标准治疗选择。锁骨上动脉岛状皮瓣(SCAIF)是一种薄而可靠的带蒂筋膜皮瓣,操作简单、快速。材料和方法:本研究共纳入19例SCAIF头颈部重建患者。SCAIF用于17例肿瘤缺损的重建,1例放疗后下面部皮肤缺损的重建,1例颈部开放性创面(爆炸伤)闭合。结果:所有患者术中、术后均无重大并发症发生。SCAIF已成功应用于19例头颈部重建手术中的18例。仅有1例(5.3%)患者出现部分皮肤坏死,未见皮瓣完全失效。皮瓣远端1.5 cm处出现部分皮肤坏死,采用局部伤口护理保守处理。所有患者皮瓣供区均未出现创面裂开。结论:SCAIF是游离皮瓣的一个很好的选择,提供几乎相同的功能效果,需要更少的手术时间和手术努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta chirurgiae plasticae
Acta chirurgiae plasticae Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Double right triangular shape full-thickness skin grafts technique for short rectangular or square shape donor site defect - original method with a case report. No drains in reduction mammaplasty - a systematic review. Nail bed trauma reconstruction and artificial nail replacement - a case report. Reports on vascular catheter-associated thromboembolic events in a burn unit - a gap in the literature? Development of aesthetic surgery in the Czech Republic - the situation before the COVID pandemic, during the pandemic, and expected changes in the practice of aesthetic surgery in the post-COVID period.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1