Automatic Identification of Upper Extremity Rehabilitation Exercise Type and Dose Using Body-Worn Sensors and Machine Learning: A Pilot Study.

Q1 Computer Science Digital Biomarkers Pub Date : 2021-07-02 eCollection Date: 2021-05-01 DOI:10.1159/000516619
Noah Balestra, Gaurav Sharma, Linda M Riek, Ania Busza
{"title":"Automatic Identification of Upper Extremity Rehabilitation Exercise Type and Dose Using Body-Worn Sensors and Machine Learning: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Noah Balestra, Gaurav Sharma, Linda M Riek, Ania Busza","doi":"10.1159/000516619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prior studies suggest that participation in rehabilitation exercises improves motor function poststroke; however, studies on optimal exercise dose and timing have been limited by the technical challenge of quantifying exercise activities over multiple days.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of this study were to assess the feasibility of using body-worn sensors to track rehabilitation exercises in the inpatient setting and investigate which recording parameters and data analysis strategies are sufficient for accurately identifying and counting exercise repetitions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MC10 BioStampRC® sensors were used to measure accelerometer and gyroscope data from upper extremities of healthy controls (<i>n</i> = 13) and individuals with upper extremity weakness due to recent stroke (<i>n</i> = 13) while the subjects performed 3 preselected arm exercises. Sensor data were then labeled by exercise type and this labeled data set was used to train a machine learning classification algorithm for identifying exercise type. The machine learning algorithm and a peak-finding algorithm were used to count exercise repetitions in non-labeled data sets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We achieved a repetition counting accuracy of 95.6% overall, and 95.0% in patients with upper extremity weakness due to stroke when using both accelerometer and gyroscope data. Accuracy was decreased when using fewer sensors or using accelerometer data alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our exploratory study suggests that body-worn sensor systems are technically feasible, well tolerated in subjects with recent stroke, and may ultimately be useful for developing a system to measure total exercise \"dose\" in poststroke patients during clinical rehabilitation or clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":11242,"journal":{"name":"Digital Biomarkers","volume":"5 2","pages":"158-166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8339513/pdf/dib-0005-0158.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Biomarkers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000516619","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prior studies suggest that participation in rehabilitation exercises improves motor function poststroke; however, studies on optimal exercise dose and timing have been limited by the technical challenge of quantifying exercise activities over multiple days.

Objectives: The objectives of this study were to assess the feasibility of using body-worn sensors to track rehabilitation exercises in the inpatient setting and investigate which recording parameters and data analysis strategies are sufficient for accurately identifying and counting exercise repetitions.

Methods: MC10 BioStampRC® sensors were used to measure accelerometer and gyroscope data from upper extremities of healthy controls (n = 13) and individuals with upper extremity weakness due to recent stroke (n = 13) while the subjects performed 3 preselected arm exercises. Sensor data were then labeled by exercise type and this labeled data set was used to train a machine learning classification algorithm for identifying exercise type. The machine learning algorithm and a peak-finding algorithm were used to count exercise repetitions in non-labeled data sets.

Results: We achieved a repetition counting accuracy of 95.6% overall, and 95.0% in patients with upper extremity weakness due to stroke when using both accelerometer and gyroscope data. Accuracy was decreased when using fewer sensors or using accelerometer data alone.

Conclusions: Our exploratory study suggests that body-worn sensor systems are technically feasible, well tolerated in subjects with recent stroke, and may ultimately be useful for developing a system to measure total exercise "dose" in poststroke patients during clinical rehabilitation or clinical trials.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用体戴式传感器和机器学习自动识别上肢康复锻炼类型和剂量:试点研究。
背景:先前的研究表明,参加康复锻炼可改善脑卒中后的运动功能;然而,由于量化多天锻炼活动的技术难题,有关最佳锻炼剂量和时间的研究受到了限制:本研究的目的是评估在住院环境中使用体戴式传感器跟踪康复运动的可行性,并研究哪些记录参数和数据分析策略足以准确识别和计算运动重复次数:方法: 使用 MC10 BioStampRC® 传感器测量健康对照组(n = 13)和近期中风导致上肢无力者(n = 13)上肢的加速度计和陀螺仪数据,同时受试者进行 3 次预选的手臂运动。然后按运动类型对传感器数据进行标注,并利用该标注数据集训练用于识别运动类型的机器学习分类算法。机器学习算法和峰值查找算法被用于计算非标记数据集中的运动重复次数:使用加速度计和陀螺仪数据时,我们的重复次数计数准确率总体达到 95.6%,因中风导致上肢无力的患者的重复次数计数准确率达到 95.0%。如果使用较少的传感器或仅使用加速度计数据,准确率则会降低:我们的探索性研究表明,体戴式传感器系统在技术上是可行的,对新近中风患者的耐受性良好,最终可用于开发一套系统,在临床康复或临床试验期间测量中风后患者的总运动 "剂量"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Digital Biomarkers
Digital Biomarkers Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊最新文献
The State of Digital Biomarkers in Mental Health. The Imperative of Voice Data Collection in Clinical Trials. eHealth and mHealth in Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs. Detecting Longitudinal Trends between Passively Collected Phone Use and Anxiety among College Students. Video Assessment to Detect Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1