Evaluation of the Use of Caffeine Citrate Maintenance Doses >5 mg/kg/day in Preterm Neonates for Apnea of Prematurity.

Q2 Medicine Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-08-16 DOI:10.5863/1551-6776-26.6.608
Laura A Salemi, Anna L Sahlstrom, Sin Yin Lim, Peter N Johnson, Douglas Dannaway, Jamie L Miller
{"title":"Evaluation of the Use of Caffeine Citrate Maintenance Doses >5 mg/kg/day in Preterm Neonates for Apnea of Prematurity.","authors":"Laura A Salemi,&nbsp;Anna L Sahlstrom,&nbsp;Sin Yin Lim,&nbsp;Peter N Johnson,&nbsp;Douglas Dannaway,&nbsp;Jamie L Miller","doi":"10.5863/1551-6776-26.6.608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Caffeine citrate doses >5 mg/kg/day are frequently used for apnea of prematurity. The primary objective was identification of patients maintained on 5 mg/kg/day (Group 1). Secondary objectives included identification of patients requiring dose increases: 7.5 mg/kg every 24 hours (Group 2), 10 mg/kg every 24 hours (Group 3), and 5 mg/kg every 12 hours (Group 4); comparison of demographics and clinical characteristics; and identification of patients requiring dose adjustments owing to caffeine-associated tachycardia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective study of neonates born between 23 to <31 weeks' gestation, receiving caffeine between January 1, 2015, and July 31, 2019. Patients receiving caffeine <1 week, initial maintenance dose >5 mg/kg/day, or with congenital abnormalities were excluded. Descriptive and inferential statistics were performed, with a p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 281 patients were included, with 99 (35.2%) in Group 1; 56 (19.9%) in Group 2; 47 (16.7%) in Group 3; and 79 (28.1%) in Group 4. Significant differences in gestational age were noted, with Group 3 and 4 patients being more premature than Groups 1 and 2 (p < 0.001). Dose increases occurred at a median postnatal age and postmenstrual age of 13.0 days and 31.4 weeks in Group 2; 17.0 days and 30.3 weeks in Group 3; and 16.0 days and 30.1 weeks in Group 4. Significant differences were noted for development of tachycardia requiring dose adjustment, with Groups 3 and 4 having the highest percentage (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Two-thirds received caffeine citrate doses >5 mg/kg/day, with 44% receiving 10 mg/kg/day. Further exploration is necessary to determine the optimal PNA or PMA for dose adjustments.</p>","PeriodicalId":37484,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"26 6","pages":"608-614"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8372865/pdf/i1551-6776-26-6-608.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5863/1551-6776-26.6.608","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/8/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: Caffeine citrate doses >5 mg/kg/day are frequently used for apnea of prematurity. The primary objective was identification of patients maintained on 5 mg/kg/day (Group 1). Secondary objectives included identification of patients requiring dose increases: 7.5 mg/kg every 24 hours (Group 2), 10 mg/kg every 24 hours (Group 3), and 5 mg/kg every 12 hours (Group 4); comparison of demographics and clinical characteristics; and identification of patients requiring dose adjustments owing to caffeine-associated tachycardia.

Methods: Retrospective study of neonates born between 23 to <31 weeks' gestation, receiving caffeine between January 1, 2015, and July 31, 2019. Patients receiving caffeine <1 week, initial maintenance dose >5 mg/kg/day, or with congenital abnormalities were excluded. Descriptive and inferential statistics were performed, with a p < 0.05.

Results: Overall, 281 patients were included, with 99 (35.2%) in Group 1; 56 (19.9%) in Group 2; 47 (16.7%) in Group 3; and 79 (28.1%) in Group 4. Significant differences in gestational age were noted, with Group 3 and 4 patients being more premature than Groups 1 and 2 (p < 0.001). Dose increases occurred at a median postnatal age and postmenstrual age of 13.0 days and 31.4 weeks in Group 2; 17.0 days and 30.3 weeks in Group 3; and 16.0 days and 30.1 weeks in Group 4. Significant differences were noted for development of tachycardia requiring dose adjustment, with Groups 3 and 4 having the highest percentage (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Two-thirds received caffeine citrate doses >5 mg/kg/day, with 44% receiving 10 mg/kg/day. Further exploration is necessary to determine the optimal PNA or PMA for dose adjustments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
枸橼酸咖啡因维持剂量>5 mg/kg/天治疗早产儿呼吸暂停的评价
目的:枸橼酸咖啡因剂量> 5mg /kg/天常用于早产儿呼吸暂停。主要目标是确定维持5mg /kg/天的患者(组1)。次要目标包括确定需要增加剂量的患者:每24小时7.5 mg/kg(组2),每24小时10mg /kg(组3)和每12小时5mg /kg(组4);人口统计学与临床特征比较;鉴别因咖啡因相关的心动过速而需要调整剂量的患者。方法:回顾性研究排除出生在23 ~ 5 mg/kg/天或有先天性异常的新生儿。进行描述性和推理性统计,p < 0.05。结果:共纳入281例患者,其中组1 99例(35.2%);2组56例(19.9%);3组47例(16.7%);第4组79例(28.1%)。胎龄差异有统计学意义,第3组和第4组患者早产率高于第1组和第2组(p < 0.001)。剂量增加发生在第二组的中位出生年龄13.0天和月经后年龄31.4周;3组17.0天,30.3周;第4组为16.0天和30.1周。需要调整剂量的心动过速的发生有显著差异,第3组和第4组的比例最高(p < 0.001)。结论:三分之二的人服用了枸橼酸咖啡因剂量> 5mg /kg/天,44%的人服用了10mg /kg/天。需要进一步探索以确定调整剂量的最佳PNA或PMA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
A geography of drought indices: mismatch between indicators of drought and its impacts on water and food securities
IF 4.6 2区 地球科学Natural Hazards and Earth System SciencesPub Date : 2022-02-07 DOI: 10.5194/nhess-22-323-2022
Sarra Kchouk, L. Melsen, D. W. Walker, P. V. van Oel
Climate Change and Drought: a Perspective on Drought Indices
IF 9.5 1区 地球科学Current climate change reportsPub Date : 2018-04-23 DOI: 10.1007/s40641-018-0098-x
S. Mukherjee, A. Mishra, K. Trenberth
来源期刊
Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics is the official journal of the Pediatric Pharmacy Advocacy Group. JPPT is a peer-reviewed multi disciplinary journal that is devoted to promoting the safe and effective use of medications in infants and children. To this end, the journal publishes practical information for all practitioners who provide care to pediatric patients. Each issue includes review articles, original clinical investigations, case reports, editorials, and other information relevant to pediatric medication therapy. The Journal focuses all work on issues related to the practice of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics. The scope of content includes pharmacotherapy, extemporaneous compounding, dosing, methods of medication administration, medication error prevention, and legislative issues. The Journal will contain original research, review articles, short subjects, case reports, clinical investigations, editorials, and news from such organizations as the Pediatric Pharmacy Advocacy Group, the FDA, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, and so on.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Erythromycin for the Treatment of Gastroparesis in Infants and Children. Evaluation of Olanzapine for the Prevention of Refractory Chemotherapy-Induced Vomiting in Pediatric Oncology Patients. Incidence of Fever Associated With Dexmedetomidine in Critically Ill Children. Impact of Arginine Hydrochloride Supplementation on Diuretic Effectiveness in Critically Ill Children. Incorporating Pediatrics in Clinical Education: A Call to Action in Inpatient Pharmacy Practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1