High-Resolution Optical Fiber Shape Sensing of Continuum Robots: A Comparative Study.

Frederic Monet, Shahriar Sefati, Pierre Lorre, Arthur Poiffaut, Samuel Kadoury, Mehran Armand, Iulian Iordachita, Raman Kashyap
{"title":"High-Resolution Optical Fiber Shape Sensing of Continuum Robots: A Comparative Study.","authors":"Frederic Monet,&nbsp;Shahriar Sefati,&nbsp;Pierre Lorre,&nbsp;Arthur Poiffaut,&nbsp;Samuel Kadoury,&nbsp;Mehran Armand,&nbsp;Iulian Iordachita,&nbsp;Raman Kashyap","doi":"10.1109/icra40945.2020.9197454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Flexible medical instruments, such as Continuum Dexterous Manipulators (CDM), constitute an important class of tools for minimally invasive surgery. Accurate CDM shape reconstruction during surgery is of great importance, yet a challenging task. Fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensors have demonstrated great potential in shape sensing and consequently tip position estimation of CDMs. However, due to the limited number of sensing locations, these sensors can only accurately recover basic shapes, and become unreliable in the presence of obstacles or many inflection points such as s-bends. Optical Frequency Domain Reflectometry (OFDR), on the other hand, can achieve much higher spatial resolution, and can therefore accurately reconstruct more complex shapes. Additionally, Random Optical Gratings by Ultraviolet laser Exposure (ROGUEs) can be written in the fibers to increase signal to noise ratio of the sensors. In this comparison study, the tip position error is used as a metric to compare both FBG and OFDR shape reconstructions for a 35 mm long CDM developed for orthopedic surgeries, using a pair of stereo cameras as ground truth. Three sets of experiments were conducted to measure the accuracy of each technique in various surgical scenarios. The tip position error for the OFDR (and FBG) technique was found to be 0.32 (0.83) mm in free-bending environment, 0.41 (0.80) mm when interacting with obstacles, and 0.45 (2.27) mm in s-bending. Moreover, the maximum tip position error remains sub-millimeter for the OFDR reconstruction, while it reaches 3.40 mm for FBG reconstruction. These results propose a cost-effective, robust and more accurate alternative to FBG sensors for reconstructing complex CDM shapes.</p>","PeriodicalId":73286,"journal":{"name":"IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation : ICRA : [proceedings]. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/icra40945.2020.9197454","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation : ICRA : [proceedings]. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/icra40945.2020.9197454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/9/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Flexible medical instruments, such as Continuum Dexterous Manipulators (CDM), constitute an important class of tools for minimally invasive surgery. Accurate CDM shape reconstruction during surgery is of great importance, yet a challenging task. Fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensors have demonstrated great potential in shape sensing and consequently tip position estimation of CDMs. However, due to the limited number of sensing locations, these sensors can only accurately recover basic shapes, and become unreliable in the presence of obstacles or many inflection points such as s-bends. Optical Frequency Domain Reflectometry (OFDR), on the other hand, can achieve much higher spatial resolution, and can therefore accurately reconstruct more complex shapes. Additionally, Random Optical Gratings by Ultraviolet laser Exposure (ROGUEs) can be written in the fibers to increase signal to noise ratio of the sensors. In this comparison study, the tip position error is used as a metric to compare both FBG and OFDR shape reconstructions for a 35 mm long CDM developed for orthopedic surgeries, using a pair of stereo cameras as ground truth. Three sets of experiments were conducted to measure the accuracy of each technique in various surgical scenarios. The tip position error for the OFDR (and FBG) technique was found to be 0.32 (0.83) mm in free-bending environment, 0.41 (0.80) mm when interacting with obstacles, and 0.45 (2.27) mm in s-bending. Moreover, the maximum tip position error remains sub-millimeter for the OFDR reconstruction, while it reaches 3.40 mm for FBG reconstruction. These results propose a cost-effective, robust and more accurate alternative to FBG sensors for reconstructing complex CDM shapes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
连续体机器人高分辨率光纤形状传感的比较研究。
柔性医疗器械,如连续体灵巧操纵器(CDM),是一类重要的微创手术工具。手术中准确的CDM形状重建非常重要,但也是一项具有挑战性的任务。光纤布拉格光栅(FBG)传感器在CDMs的形状传感和尖端位置估计方面显示出巨大的潜力。然而,由于传感位置的数量有限,这些传感器只能准确地恢复基本形状,并且在存在障碍物或许多拐点(如s型弯道)时变得不可靠。另一方面,光频域反射法(OFDR)可以实现更高的空间分辨率,因此可以准确地重建更复杂的形状。此外,还可以在光纤中写入紫外激光曝光随机光栅(ROGUEs),以提高传感器的信噪比。在这项比较研究中,使用一对立体摄像机作为地面真值,使用尖端位置误差作为度量来比较用于骨科手术的35mm长的CDM的FBG和OFDR形状重建。进行了三组实验来测量每种技术在不同手术情况下的准确性。OFDR(和FBG)技术的尖端位置误差在自由弯曲环境中为0.32 (0.83)mm,在与障碍物相互作用时为0.41 (0.80)mm,在s弯曲环境中为0.45 (2.27)mm。此外,OFDR重建的最大尖端位置误差保持在亚毫米,而FBG重建的最大尖端位置误差达到3.40 mm。这些结果为重建复杂CDM形状的FBG传感器提供了一种具有成本效益,鲁棒性和更精确的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Gait Event Detection with Proprioceptive Force Sensing in a Powered Knee-Ankle Prosthesis: Validation over Walking Speeds and Slopes. SAGE: SLAM with Appearance and Geometry Prior for Endoscopy. Adaptive Semi-Supervised Intent Inferral to Control a Powered Hand Orthosis for Stroke. Resolution-Optimal Motion Planning for Steerable Needles. Stair Ascent Phase-Variable Control of a Powered Knee-Ankle Prosthesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1