The efficacy of airway pressure release ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome adult patients: A meta-analysis of clinical trials.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Annals of Thoracic Medicine Pub Date : 2021-07-01 Epub Date: 2021-07-20 DOI:10.4103/atm.ATM_475_20
Fatmah Othman, Noura Alsagami, Reem Alharbi, Yara Almuammer, Shatha Alshahrani, Taha Ismaeil
{"title":"The efficacy of airway pressure release ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome adult patients: A meta-analysis of clinical trials.","authors":"Fatmah Othman, Noura Alsagami, Reem Alharbi, Yara Almuammer, Shatha Alshahrani, Taha Ismaeil","doi":"10.4103/atm.ATM_475_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To recruit poorly ventilated lung areas by providing active and adequate oxygenation is a core aspect of treating patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) mode is increasingly accepted as a means of supporting patients with ARDS. This study aimed to determine whether the APRV mode is effective in improving oxygenation, compared to conventional ventilation, in adult ARDS patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted the study according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We searched for clinical trials in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library until April 2019. We included all studies comparing APRV and other conventional mechanical ventilation modes for adult ARDS patients. Our primary outcome was oxygenation status (defined as the day 3 PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ratio). The secondary outcomes were the length of stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit (ICU) and mortality. Sensitivity analyses were performed including studies with conventional low-tidal volume ventilation as a comparator ventilation strategy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included six clinical trials enrolling a total of 375 patients. The day 3 PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> was reported in all the studies, and it was significantly higher in patients receiving APRV (mean difference [MD] 51.9 mmHg, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 8.2-95.5, <i>P</i> = 0.02, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup>= 92%). There was no significant difference in mortality between APRV and the other conventional ventilator modes (risk difference 0.07, 95% CI: -0.01-0.15, <i>P</i> = 0.08, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup>0%). The point estimate for the effect of APRV on the LOS in ICU indicated a significant reduction in the ICU LOS for the APRV group compared to the counter group (MD 3.1 days, 95% CI 0.4-5.9, <i>P</i> = 0.02, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup>= 53%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, using the APRV mode may improve oxygenation on day 3 and contribute to reducing the LOS in ICU. However, it is difficult to draw a clinical message about APRV, and well-designed clinical trials are required to investigate this issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":50760,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic Medicine","volume":"16 3","pages":"245-252"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0e/db/ATM-16-245.PMC8388564.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Thoracic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/atm.ATM_475_20","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To recruit poorly ventilated lung areas by providing active and adequate oxygenation is a core aspect of treating patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) mode is increasingly accepted as a means of supporting patients with ARDS. This study aimed to determine whether the APRV mode is effective in improving oxygenation, compared to conventional ventilation, in adult ARDS patients.

Methods: We conducted the study according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We searched for clinical trials in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library until April 2019. We included all studies comparing APRV and other conventional mechanical ventilation modes for adult ARDS patients. Our primary outcome was oxygenation status (defined as the day 3 PaO2/FiO2 ratio). The secondary outcomes were the length of stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit (ICU) and mortality. Sensitivity analyses were performed including studies with conventional low-tidal volume ventilation as a comparator ventilation strategy.

Results: We included six clinical trials enrolling a total of 375 patients. The day 3 PaO2/FiO2 was reported in all the studies, and it was significantly higher in patients receiving APRV (mean difference [MD] 51.9 mmHg, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 8.2-95.5, P = 0.02, I 2= 92%). There was no significant difference in mortality between APRV and the other conventional ventilator modes (risk difference 0.07, 95% CI: -0.01-0.15, P = 0.08, I 20%). The point estimate for the effect of APRV on the LOS in ICU indicated a significant reduction in the ICU LOS for the APRV group compared to the counter group (MD 3.1 days, 95% CI 0.4-5.9, P = 0.02, I 2= 53%).

Conclusion: In this study, using the APRV mode may improve oxygenation on day 3 and contribute to reducing the LOS in ICU. However, it is difficult to draw a clinical message about APRV, and well-designed clinical trials are required to investigate this issue.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性呼吸窘迫综合征成人患者气道压力释放通气的疗效:临床试验荟萃分析。
背景:通过提供积极和充分的氧合来招募通风不良的肺部区域是治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者的核心方面。气道压力释放通气(APRV)模式作为支持ARDS患者的一种手段越来越被接受。本研究旨在确定在成人ARDS患者中,与传统通气相比,APRV模式是否能有效改善氧合。方法:我们根据系统评价的首选报告项目和荟萃分析指南进行研究。我们在PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆搜索临床试验,直到2019年4月。我们纳入了所有比较成年ARDS患者APRV和其他常规机械通气模式的研究。我们的主要结果是氧合状态(定义为第3天的PaO2/FiO2比率)。次要结果是重症监护室(ICU)的住院时间(LOS)和死亡率。进行了敏感性分析,包括将常规低潮气量通气作为对照通气策略的研究。结果:我们纳入了6项临床试验,共纳入375名患者。所有研究都报告了第3天的PaO2/FiO2,并且在接受APRV的患者中显著更高(平均差异[MD]51.9 mmHg,95%置信区间(CI)8.2-95.5,P=0.02,I2=92%)。APRV和其他常规呼吸机模式的死亡率没有显著差异(风险差异0.07,95%CI:-0.01-0.15,P=0.08,I 20%)。APRV对ICU服务水平影响的点估计表明,与对照组相比,APRV组的ICU服务水平显著降低(MD 3.1天,95%CI 0.4-5.9,P=0.02,I2=53%)。结论:在本研究中,使用APRV模式可以改善第3天的氧合,并有助于降低ICU的LOS。然而,很难得出关于APRV的临床信息,需要精心设计的临床试验来研究这个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Thoracic Medicine
Annals of Thoracic Medicine CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal will cover studies related to multidisciplinary specialties of chest medicine, such as adult and pediatrics pulmonology, thoracic surgery, critical care medicine, respiratory care, transplantation, sleep medicine, related basic medical sciences, and more. The journal also features basic science, special reports, case reports, board review , and more. Editorials and communications to the editor that explore controversial issues and encourage further discussion by physicians dealing with chest medicine.
期刊最新文献
Effect of surgery on survival of patients with small-cell lung cancer undiagnosed before resection. Investigating the dynamic relationship of sleep-disordered breathing, orthodontic treatment needs, and dental esthetics in the general population. Is chest tube omission safe for patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax scheduled for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery? Sleep disorders among elderly in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study. To assess the differences between thymoma patients with/without myasthenia all of their characteristics must be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1