[Five years University Practice of Elderly Care: users, care provided, costs and experiences].

Brigit Ronde, Hana Broulikova, Judith Bosmans, Franka Meiland
{"title":"[Five years University Practice of Elderly Care: users, care provided, costs and experiences].","authors":"Brigit Ronde,&nbsp;Hana Broulikova,&nbsp;Judith Bosmans,&nbsp;Franka Meiland","doi":"10.36613/tgg.1875-6832/2021.02.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The increasing number of elderly people living at home demands a strengthening of primary care for (vulnerable) older adults. Therefore, in 2015 the VU University Medical Centre in Amsterdam founded the Universitaire Praktijk Ouderengeneeskunde (UPO) (University Practice for Elderly Care). This practice makes the expertise of the Elderly Care physician (SO) available in primary care through a close and easy accessible collaboration between the SO and the General Practitioner. The aim of this research is an evaluation of the UPO, in order to determine the added value of this care innovation and to identify areas for improvement. This research consists of a quantitative part in which the characteristics of the 190 treated UPO patients have been assessed. Also, costs have been estimated of UPO care compared to expected usual care. The qualitative part of this study consists of 22 interviews with the most important UPO stakeholders. The results of this study show  that 1) the UPO seems to meet a demand from general practitioners to support them in the care of vulnerable elderly people with mostly cognitive disorders, 2) this care seems to save costs and 3) the UPO was appreciated by most of those involved. The current results call for applying this care innovation in other regions and to evaluate it on a larger scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":39945,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie","volume":"52 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36613/tgg.1875-6832/2021.02.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The increasing number of elderly people living at home demands a strengthening of primary care for (vulnerable) older adults. Therefore, in 2015 the VU University Medical Centre in Amsterdam founded the Universitaire Praktijk Ouderengeneeskunde (UPO) (University Practice for Elderly Care). This practice makes the expertise of the Elderly Care physician (SO) available in primary care through a close and easy accessible collaboration between the SO and the General Practitioner. The aim of this research is an evaluation of the UPO, in order to determine the added value of this care innovation and to identify areas for improvement. This research consists of a quantitative part in which the characteristics of the 190 treated UPO patients have been assessed. Also, costs have been estimated of UPO care compared to expected usual care. The qualitative part of this study consists of 22 interviews with the most important UPO stakeholders. The results of this study show  that 1) the UPO seems to meet a demand from general practitioners to support them in the care of vulnerable elderly people with mostly cognitive disorders, 2) this care seems to save costs and 3) the UPO was appreciated by most of those involved. The current results call for applying this care innovation in other regions and to evaluate it on a larger scale.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[五年大学老年护理实践:用户、提供的护理、成本和经验]。
越来越多的老年人住在家里,要求加强对(脆弱的)老年人的初级保健。因此,2015年阿姆斯特丹自由大学医学中心成立了Universitaire Praktijk Ouderengeneeskunde (UPO)(老年护理大学实践)。这种做法使老年护理医生(SO)的专业知识可以通过SO和全科医生之间的密切和容易获得的合作在初级保健中使用。本研究的目的是对UPO进行评估,以确定这种护理创新的附加价值,并确定需要改进的领域。本研究包括定量部分,其中对190例治疗的UPO患者的特征进行了评估。此外,与预期的常规护理相比,估计了UPO护理的费用。本研究的定性部分包括与最重要的UPO利益相关者的22次访谈。本研究结果显示:1)UPO似乎满足了全科医生的需求,支持他们照顾以认知障碍为主的弱势老年人;2)这种照顾似乎节省了成本;3)UPO得到了大多数参与者的赞赏。目前的结果要求在其他地区应用这种护理创新,并对其进行更大规模的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊最新文献
Ervaringen met COVID-19 maatregelen onder oudere Nederlandse thuiswonende migranten [Evaluation of an information booklet on end-of-life care in dementia: a mixed-methods study assessing the preferences of family caregivers and healthcare professionals]. Onderzoek naar kwetsbaarheid bij ouderen: waar staan we 15 jaar na het Nationaal Programma Ouderenzorg? [The tradeoff between an open or closed unit for residents with dementia: a qualitative study]. [Experiences, wishes and needs of patients with regard to patient participation during geriatric rehabilitation].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1