Real-life use of tocilizumab with or without corticosteroid in hospitalized patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 pneumonia: A retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2021-09-10 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0257376
Gianluca Russo, Angelo Solimini, Paola Zuccalà, Maria Antonella Zingaropoli, Anna Carraro, Patrizia Pasculli, Valentina Perri, Raffaella Marocco, Blerta Kertusha, Cosmo Del Borgo, Emanuela Del Giudice, Laura Fondaco, Tiziana Tieghi, Claudia D'Agostino, Alessandra Oliva, Vincenzo Vullo, Maria Rosa Ciardi, Claudio Maria Mastroianni, Miriam Lichtner
{"title":"Real-life use of tocilizumab with or without corticosteroid in hospitalized patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 pneumonia: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Gianluca Russo,&nbsp;Angelo Solimini,&nbsp;Paola Zuccalà,&nbsp;Maria Antonella Zingaropoli,&nbsp;Anna Carraro,&nbsp;Patrizia Pasculli,&nbsp;Valentina Perri,&nbsp;Raffaella Marocco,&nbsp;Blerta Kertusha,&nbsp;Cosmo Del Borgo,&nbsp;Emanuela Del Giudice,&nbsp;Laura Fondaco,&nbsp;Tiziana Tieghi,&nbsp;Claudia D'Agostino,&nbsp;Alessandra Oliva,&nbsp;Vincenzo Vullo,&nbsp;Maria Rosa Ciardi,&nbsp;Claudio Maria Mastroianni,&nbsp;Miriam Lichtner","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0257376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of Tocilizumab (with or without corticosteroids) in a real-life context among moderate-to-severe COVID-19 patients hospitalized at the Infectious Diseases ward of two hospitals in Lazio region, Italy, during the first wave of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study among moderate-to-severe COVID-19 pneumonia to assess the influence of tocilizumab (with or without corticosteroids) on: 1) primary composite outcome: risk for death/invasive mechanical ventilation/ICU-transfer at 14 days from hospital admission; 2) secondary outcome: COVID-related death only. Both outcomes were also assessed at 28 days and restricted to baseline more severe cases. We also evaluated the safety of tocilizumab.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 412 patients were recruited, being affected by mild (6.8%), moderate (66.3%) or severe (26.9%) COVID-19 at baseline. The median participant' age was 63 years, 56.5% were men, the sum of comorbidities was 1.34 (±1.44), and the median time from symptom onset to hospital admission was 7 [3-10] days. Patients were subdivided in 4 treatment groups: standard of care (SoC) only (n = 172), SoC plus corticosteroid (n = 65), SoC plus tocilizumab (n = 50), SoC plus tocilizumab and corticosteroid (n = 125). Twenty-six (6.3%) patients underwent intubation, and 37 (9%) COVID-related deaths were recorded. After adjusting for several factors, multivariate analysis showed that tocilizumab (with or without corticosteroids) was associated to improved primary and secondary outcomes at 14 days, and at 28-days only when tocilizumab administered without corticosteroid. Among more severe cases the protective effect of tocilizumab (± corticosteroids) was observed at both time-points. No safety concerns were recorded.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although contrasting results from randomized clinical trials to date, in our experience tocilizumab was a safe and efficacious therapeutic option for patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Its efficacy was improved by the concomitant administration of corticosteroids in patients affected by severe-COVID-19 pneumonia at baseline.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":" ","pages":"e0257376"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8432821/pdf/","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257376","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of Tocilizumab (with or without corticosteroids) in a real-life context among moderate-to-severe COVID-19 patients hospitalized at the Infectious Diseases ward of two hospitals in Lazio region, Italy, during the first wave of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

Method: We conducted a retrospective cohort study among moderate-to-severe COVID-19 pneumonia to assess the influence of tocilizumab (with or without corticosteroids) on: 1) primary composite outcome: risk for death/invasive mechanical ventilation/ICU-transfer at 14 days from hospital admission; 2) secondary outcome: COVID-related death only. Both outcomes were also assessed at 28 days and restricted to baseline more severe cases. We also evaluated the safety of tocilizumab.

Results: Overall, 412 patients were recruited, being affected by mild (6.8%), moderate (66.3%) or severe (26.9%) COVID-19 at baseline. The median participant' age was 63 years, 56.5% were men, the sum of comorbidities was 1.34 (±1.44), and the median time from symptom onset to hospital admission was 7 [3-10] days. Patients were subdivided in 4 treatment groups: standard of care (SoC) only (n = 172), SoC plus corticosteroid (n = 65), SoC plus tocilizumab (n = 50), SoC plus tocilizumab and corticosteroid (n = 125). Twenty-six (6.3%) patients underwent intubation, and 37 (9%) COVID-related deaths were recorded. After adjusting for several factors, multivariate analysis showed that tocilizumab (with or without corticosteroids) was associated to improved primary and secondary outcomes at 14 days, and at 28-days only when tocilizumab administered without corticosteroid. Among more severe cases the protective effect of tocilizumab (± corticosteroids) was observed at both time-points. No safety concerns were recorded.

Conclusion: Although contrasting results from randomized clinical trials to date, in our experience tocilizumab was a safe and efficacious therapeutic option for patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Its efficacy was improved by the concomitant administration of corticosteroids in patients affected by severe-COVID-19 pneumonia at baseline.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
托珠单抗在中重度COVID-19肺炎住院患者中联合或不联合皮质类固醇的实际使用:一项回顾性队列研究
目的:评估托珠单抗(加或不加皮质类固醇)在现实生活中对意大利拉齐奥地区两家医院传染病病房住院的中重度COVID-19患者的有效性(第一波SARS-CoV-2大流行)。方法:我们对中重度COVID-19肺炎患者进行回顾性队列研究,以评估托珠单抗(加或不加皮质类固醇)对以下方面的影响:1)主要综合结局:入院后14天死亡/有创机械通气/ icu转移风险;2)次要结局:仅与冠状病毒相关的死亡。这两种结果也在28天进行评估,并仅限于基线更严重的病例。我们还评估了tocilizumab的安全性。结果:总共招募了412名患者,在基线时受到轻度(6.8%)、中度(66.3%)或重度(26.9%)COVID-19的影响。参与者的中位年龄为63岁,男性占56.5%,合并症总数为1.34(±1.44),从症状出现到住院的中位时间为7[3-10]天。患者被细分为4个治疗组:仅标准护理(SoC) (n = 172)、SoC加皮质类固醇(n = 65)、SoC加托珠单抗(n = 50)、SoC加托珠单抗和皮质类固醇(n = 125)。26例(6.3%)患者接受了插管,记录了37例(9%)与冠状病毒相关的死亡。在调整了几个因素后,多因素分析显示tocilizumab(有或没有皮质类固醇)与14天的主要和次要结局改善有关,而在28天只有在tocilizumab不使用皮质类固醇的情况下。在更严重的病例中,tocilizumab(±皮质类固醇)的保护作用在两个时间点都被观察到。没有安全隐患记录。结论:尽管迄今为止随机临床试验的结果存在差异,但根据我们的经验,tocilizumab是中重度COVID-19肺炎患者安全有效的治疗选择。重症covid -19肺炎患者在基线时同时给予皮质类固醇可提高其疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
期刊最新文献
Changes in anemia prevalence and the proportion of anemia associated with iron deficiency or inflammation in young children residing in Puno, Peru: Analysis using new World Health Organization guidelines for defining anemia. Unveiling nonlinear effects of Digital Inclusive Finance on urban-rural integration: A threshold panel analysis of China. Boundary-aware dual-discriminator generative adversarial network for data augmentation in financial transaction fraud detection. Care practices, popular knowledge, and health promotion among quilombola woman in Brazil. Joint modeling of alcohol and tobacco use among adults in Uganda.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1