Global Surgery Fellowships-An Investigation of Opportunities, Outcomes, and Applicants.

IF 0.3 Q4 SURGERY Journal of Hand and Microsurgery Pub Date : 2021-07-01 Epub Date: 2021-03-23 DOI:10.1055/s-0041-1726672
Eliza J Davison, Satyendra K Singh, Barbara Jemec
{"title":"Global Surgery Fellowships-An Investigation of Opportunities, Outcomes, and Applicants.","authors":"Eliza J Davison, Satyendra K Singh, Barbara Jemec","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1726672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Following the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery in 2015, the Global Surgery Fellowships have risen in popularity, advertised as formalized opportunities for surgical trainees who have an interest in international surgical care. There is currently no up-to-date review of all fellowships available and an urgently needed overview of these opportunities is presented, including critical appraisal of their accessibility, funding, and outcomes. Detailed searches were conducted on the web engine Google, using the term \"global surgery fellowship\" and iterations. From the 547 resulting links, after applying exclusion criteria, 69 relevant fellowships were included in analysis. The majority of fellowships based in the United States (55%) and arranged by non-governmental organizations (NGOs) or universities (>70%). Also, 60% of fellowships had a duration of 1 year or longer. Only a quarter of the fellowships was open solely to trainees from low- or middle-income countries (LMIC), with over 80% of these being full funded. But 40% of the fellowships were advertised as open to trainees from any country, though only one-third of these provided full funding. Key themes across the fellowships' outcomes included \"Professional Development,\" \"Research,\" and \"LMIC Quality Improvement.\" Almost all of the fellowships (95%) stated international travel opportunities. Twelve of the fellowships offered higher degrees, with the most common being a Masters of Public Health. The global distribution of fellowships and reduced funding opportunities for trainees from LMIC limit accessibility of the Global Surgery Fellowships. It is, however, still promising that most of key themes and high rates of international work are in line with The Lancet Commission's recommendations. This overview of the Global Surgery Fellowships highlights the need for collaboration between institutions and has illustrated points for consideration when introducing new and the value of established fellowships.</p>","PeriodicalId":45368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand and Microsurgery","volume":"13 3","pages":"196-201"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8426046/pdf/10-1055-s-0041-1726672.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand and Microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1726672","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/3/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Following the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery in 2015, the Global Surgery Fellowships have risen in popularity, advertised as formalized opportunities for surgical trainees who have an interest in international surgical care. There is currently no up-to-date review of all fellowships available and an urgently needed overview of these opportunities is presented, including critical appraisal of their accessibility, funding, and outcomes. Detailed searches were conducted on the web engine Google, using the term "global surgery fellowship" and iterations. From the 547 resulting links, after applying exclusion criteria, 69 relevant fellowships were included in analysis. The majority of fellowships based in the United States (55%) and arranged by non-governmental organizations (NGOs) or universities (>70%). Also, 60% of fellowships had a duration of 1 year or longer. Only a quarter of the fellowships was open solely to trainees from low- or middle-income countries (LMIC), with over 80% of these being full funded. But 40% of the fellowships were advertised as open to trainees from any country, though only one-third of these provided full funding. Key themes across the fellowships' outcomes included "Professional Development," "Research," and "LMIC Quality Improvement." Almost all of the fellowships (95%) stated international travel opportunities. Twelve of the fellowships offered higher degrees, with the most common being a Masters of Public Health. The global distribution of fellowships and reduced funding opportunities for trainees from LMIC limit accessibility of the Global Surgery Fellowships. It is, however, still promising that most of key themes and high rates of international work are in line with The Lancet Commission's recommendations. This overview of the Global Surgery Fellowships highlights the need for collaboration between institutions and has illustrated points for consideration when introducing new and the value of established fellowships.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球外科奖学金--机会、结果和申请人调查。
继 2015 年柳叶刀全球外科委员会成立之后,全球外科研究员职位大受欢迎,被宣传为为对国际外科护理感兴趣的外科学员提供的正式机会。目前还没有关于所有研究金的最新综述,因此急需对这些机会进行综述,包括对其可获得性、资金和成果进行批判性评估。我们在谷歌搜索引擎上使用 "全球外科奖学金 "一词及其迭代词进行了详细搜索。从搜索到的 547 个链接中,在应用排除标准后,有 69 个相关的研究金被纳入分析。大部分研究金设在美国(55%),由非政府组织或大学安排(>70%)。此外,60%的研究金期限为 1 年或更长。只有四分之一的研究金只向中低收入国家(LMIC)的受训人员开放,其中 80% 以上是全额资助的。但有 40% 的研究金向任何国家的受训人员开放,但其中只有三分之一提供全额资助。研究金成果的关键主题包括 "专业发展"、"研究 "和 "低收入国家质量改进"。几乎所有研究金(95%)都提供了国际旅行机会。有 12 项奖学金提供更高的学位,其中最常见的是公共卫生硕士学位。由于研究金在全球的分布,以及对来自低收入、中等收入国家的受训人员的资助机会减少,限制了全球外科研究金的可及性。不过,大多数关键主题和高比例的国际工作都符合柳叶刀委员会的建议,这一点仍然令人充满希望。对全球外科研究金的概述强调了各机构之间合作的必要性,并说明了在引入新的研究金时需要考虑的要点以及已有研究金的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
The modified placenta model for microsurgery training: Recommended methods for comprehensive microsurgery experience. Ulnar shaft diameter as it relates to plate osteosynthesis: A cadaveric study. A cross-sectional quantitative analysis of the readability and quality of online resources regarding thumb carpometacarpal joint replacement surgery. Diagnostic and management strategies for pseudoaneurysm of the ulnar artery: A scoping review. Predictors of leech therapy failure in revascularized and replanted digits.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1