What Is a "Racial Health Disparity"? Five Analytic Traditions.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.1215/03616878-9517163
Merlin Chowkwanyun
{"title":"What Is a \"Racial Health Disparity\"? Five Analytic Traditions.","authors":"Merlin Chowkwanyun","doi":"10.1215/03616878-9517163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>What exactly is a \"racial health disparity\"? This article explores five lenses that have been used to answer that question. It contends that racial health disparities have been presented-by researchers both within academia and outside of it-as problems of five varieties: biology, behavior, place, stress, and policy. It also argues that a sixth tradition exploring class-and its connection to race, racism, and health-has been underdeveloped. The author examines each of these conceptions of racial disparities in turn. Baked into each interpretive prism is a set of assumptions about the mechanisms that produce disparities-a story, in other words, about where racial health disparities come from. Discursive boundaries set the parameters for policy debate, determining what is and is not included in proposed solutions. How one sees racial health disparities, then, influences the strategies a society advocates-or ignores-for their elimination. The author ends by briefly discussing problems in the larger research ecosystem that dictate how racial health disparities are studied.</p>","PeriodicalId":54812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","volume":"47 2","pages":"131-158"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-9517163","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

What exactly is a "racial health disparity"? This article explores five lenses that have been used to answer that question. It contends that racial health disparities have been presented-by researchers both within academia and outside of it-as problems of five varieties: biology, behavior, place, stress, and policy. It also argues that a sixth tradition exploring class-and its connection to race, racism, and health-has been underdeveloped. The author examines each of these conceptions of racial disparities in turn. Baked into each interpretive prism is a set of assumptions about the mechanisms that produce disparities-a story, in other words, about where racial health disparities come from. Discursive boundaries set the parameters for policy debate, determining what is and is not included in proposed solutions. How one sees racial health disparities, then, influences the strategies a society advocates-or ignores-for their elimination. The author ends by briefly discussing problems in the larger research ecosystem that dictate how racial health disparities are studied.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
什么是“种族健康差异”?五种分析传统。
“种族健康差异”究竟是什么?本文探讨了五个用来回答这个问题的镜头。它认为,学术界内外的研究人员都提出了种族健康差异的五个方面的问题:生物学、行为、地域、压力和政策。它还认为,探索阶级及其与种族、种族主义和健康的联系的第六个传统尚未得到发展。作者依次考察了这些种族差异的概念。每种解释的棱镜都包含了一系列关于产生差异的机制的假设——换句话说,这是一个关于种族健康差异从何而来的故事。话语边界为政策辩论设定了参数,决定了建议的解决方案中应该包括什么,不应该包括什么。因此,一个人如何看待种族健康差异,会影响一个社会倡导或忽视消除种族健康差异的策略。作者最后简要讨论了在更大的研究生态系统中决定如何研究种族健康差异的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A leading journal in its field, and the primary source of communication across the many disciplines it serves, the Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law focuses on the initiation, formulation, and implementation of health policy and analyzes the relations between government and health—past, present, and future.
期刊最新文献
Explaining Political Differences in Attitudes to Vaccines in France: Partisan Cues, Disenchantment with Politics, and Political Sophistication. Implementing Primary Care Reform in France: Bargaining, Policy Adaptation, and the Maisons de Santé Pluriprofessionnelles. Policy Feedback and the Politics of Childhood Vaccine Mandates: Conflict and Change in California, 2012-2019. Regime Type and Data Manipulation: Evidence from the COVID-19 Pandemic. Why Some Nonelderly Adult Medicaid Enrollees Appear Ineligible Based on Their Annual Income.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1