Considering Augmentative and Alternative Communication Research for Brain-Computer Interface Practice.

Q4 Medicine Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits Pub Date : 2019-01-01

Kevin M Pitt, Jonathan S Brumberg, Adrienne R Pitt

{"title":"Considering Augmentative and Alternative Communication Research for Brain-Computer Interface Practice.","authors":"Kevin M Pitt, Jonathan S Brumberg, Adrienne R Pitt","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) aim to provide access to augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices via brain activity alone. However, while BCI technology is expanding in the laboratory setting there is minimal incorporation into clinical practice. Building upon established AAC research and clinical best practices may aid the clinical translation of BCI practice, allowing advancements in both fields to be fully leveraged.Method: A multidisciplinary team developed considerations for how BCI products, practice, and policy may build upon existing AAC research, based upon published reports of existing AAC and BCI procedures.Outcomes/benefits: Within each consideration, a review of BCI research is provided, along with considerations regarding how BCI procedures may build upon existing AAC methods. The consistent use of clinical/research procedures across disciplines can help facilitate collaborative efforts, engaging a range-individuals within the AAC community in the transition of BCI into clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":36939,"journal":{"name":"Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits","volume":"13 1","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8442856/pdf/nihms-1595002.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) aim to provide access to augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices via brain activity alone. However, while BCI technology is expanding in the laboratory setting there is minimal incorporation into clinical practice. Building upon established AAC research and clinical best practices may aid the clinical translation of BCI practice, allowing advancements in both fields to be fully leveraged.

Method: A multidisciplinary team developed considerations for how BCI products, practice, and policy may build upon existing AAC research, based upon published reports of existing AAC and BCI procedures.

Outcomes/benefits: Within each consideration, a review of BCI research is provided, along with considerations regarding how BCI procedures may build upon existing AAC methods. The consistent use of clinical/research procedures across disciplines can help facilitate collaborative efforts, engaging a range-individuals within the AAC community in the transition of BCI into clinical practice.

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

在脑机接口实践中考虑辅助和替代性交流研究。

目的：脑机接口（BCI）旨在仅通过大脑活动就能使用辅助和替代性交流（AAC）设备。然而，虽然 BCI 技术在实验室环境中不断扩展，但在临床实践中的应用却少之又少。在已有的辅助和替代性交流（AAC）研究和临床最佳实践的基础上，BCI 的临床转化实践可能会有所帮助，从而充分利用这两个领域的进步：方法：一个多学科团队根据已发表的关于现有人工辅助和生物介入程序的报告，制定了关于生物介入产品、实践和政策如何建立在现有人工辅助和生物介入研究基础上的考虑因素：在每个考虑因素中，都对 BCI 研究进行了回顾，并考虑了 BCI 程序如何以现有的自动辅助听力方法为基础。跨学科临床/研究程序的一致使用有助于促进合作努力，让 AAC 社区中的各种人员参与到 BCI 向临床实践的过渡中来。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits Medicine-Rehabilitation

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量