The effect of amblyopia on clinical outcomes of children with astigmatism.

IF 2.3 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2021-09-13 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1177/25158414211040898
Burçin Çakır, Nilgün Özkan Aksoy, Sedat Özmen, Özlem Bursalı
{"title":"The effect of amblyopia on clinical outcomes of children with astigmatism.","authors":"Burçin Çakır, Nilgün Özkan Aksoy, Sedat Özmen, Özlem Bursalı","doi":"10.1177/25158414211040898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Amblyopia is more common in children with high astigmatism, but factors contributing to development of amblyopia and visual outcomes are not fully understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effect of amblyopia on the clinical outcomes in children with ⩾1.75 diopter (D) astigmatism.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed the medical records of children with ⩾1.75 D astigmatism with and without amblyopia (amblyopes group and non-amblyopes group). The mean age, gender, amount and type of ocular deviation, presence of convergence insufficiency (CI), stereopsis, time of initial spectacle use and follow-up time, differences in best-corrected visual acuity (VoD) and spherical equivalent (SE) between eyes were assessed and compared between the groups. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), mean SE, astigmatism measurements were assessed and compared between amblyopic, fellow, and non-amblyopic eyes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The records included 68 eyes of 34 children with amblyopia and 56 eyes of 28 children without amblyopia. The mean age, gender, amount and type of ocular deviation, presence of CI, stereopsis, time of initial spectacle use, follow-up time, and the difference in SE did not differ between groups. In amblyopes, exodeviation was more common and statistically greater in near (33 cm) than at distance (6 m) (p = 0.005). The mean BCVA and astigmatism values were statistically different between amblyopic, fellow, and non-amblyopic eyes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A greater near than distance exodeviation and higher mean astigmatism value were found in amblyopic children with astigmatism.</p>","PeriodicalId":23054,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology","volume":"13 ","pages":"25158414211040898"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/77/4d/10.1177_25158414211040898.PMC8442477.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25158414211040898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Amblyopia is more common in children with high astigmatism, but factors contributing to development of amblyopia and visual outcomes are not fully understood.

Objective: To evaluate the effect of amblyopia on the clinical outcomes in children with ⩾1.75 diopter (D) astigmatism.

Methods: We reviewed the medical records of children with ⩾1.75 D astigmatism with and without amblyopia (amblyopes group and non-amblyopes group). The mean age, gender, amount and type of ocular deviation, presence of convergence insufficiency (CI), stereopsis, time of initial spectacle use and follow-up time, differences in best-corrected visual acuity (VoD) and spherical equivalent (SE) between eyes were assessed and compared between the groups. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), mean SE, astigmatism measurements were assessed and compared between amblyopic, fellow, and non-amblyopic eyes.

Results: The records included 68 eyes of 34 children with amblyopia and 56 eyes of 28 children without amblyopia. The mean age, gender, amount and type of ocular deviation, presence of CI, stereopsis, time of initial spectacle use, follow-up time, and the difference in SE did not differ between groups. In amblyopes, exodeviation was more common and statistically greater in near (33 cm) than at distance (6 m) (p = 0.005). The mean BCVA and astigmatism values were statistically different between amblyopic, fellow, and non-amblyopic eyes.

Conclusion: A greater near than distance exodeviation and higher mean astigmatism value were found in amblyopic children with astigmatism.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
弱视对散光儿童临床疗效的影响。
背景:弱视在散光度数较高的儿童中更为常见,但导致弱视发生的因素和视觉结果尚未完全清楚:弱视在散光度数较高的儿童中更为常见,但导致弱视发展和视觉结果的因素尚不完全清楚:目的:评估弱视对散光度数⩾1.75d(D)儿童临床结果的影响:我们查阅了散光度数⩾1.75 D的儿童的病历,包括弱视和非弱视(弱视组和非弱视组)。评估并比较了两组儿童的平均年龄、性别、眼球偏斜的程度和类型、是否存在辐辏不全(CI)、立体视、首次配戴眼镜的时间和随访时间、两眼最佳矫正视力(VoD)和球面等效视力(SE)的差异。对弱视眼、同视眼和非弱视眼的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、平均SE和散光测量值进行了评估和比较:记录包括 34 名弱视儿童的 68 只眼睛和 28 名非弱视儿童的 56 只眼睛。两组儿童的平均年龄、性别、眼球偏斜的程度和类型、是否存在 CI、立体视、初次配戴眼镜的时间、随访时间以及 SE 的差异均无差异。在弱视患者中,近距离(33 厘米)的眼球外偏离比远距离(6 米)的眼球外偏离更常见,而且在统计学上也更大(P = 0.005)。弱视眼、同视眼和非弱视眼的 BCVA 和散光平均值在统计学上存在差异:结论:在散光弱视儿童中,近距离外差大于远距离外差,平均散光值较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The efficacy and safety of continuous blanket suture for severe recurrent pterygium with symblepharon. The experiences of visually impaired military veterans with Charles Bonnet syndrome. Are depression, anxiety and loneliness associated with visual hallucinations in younger adults with Charles Bonnet syndrome? Clinical characteristics of allergic conjunctivitis in the Southern region of Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study. Optical coherence tomography angiography to assess for retinal vascular changes in Neuro-Sjögren.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1