Effect of Different Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength of the Hybrid Ceramic Characterization Layer.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI:10.3290/j.jad.b2000235
Manassés Tercio Vieira Grangeiro, Natalia Rivoli Rossi, Larissa Araújo Lopes Barreto, Marco Antonio Bottino, João Paulo Mendes Tribst
{"title":"Effect of Different Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength of the Hybrid Ceramic Characterization Layer.","authors":"Manassés Tercio Vieira Grangeiro,&nbsp;Natalia Rivoli Rossi,&nbsp;Larissa Araújo Lopes Barreto,&nbsp;Marco Antonio Bottino,&nbsp;João Paulo Mendes Tribst","doi":"10.3290/j.jad.b2000235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Using the microshear bond strength (µSBS) test, this study investigated the bond strength between a hybrid ceramic and the extrinsic characterization layer after different ceramic surface treatments.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Hybrid ceramic blocks (Vita Enamic, Vita Zahnfabrik) were sectioned and randomly divided into 4 groups (N = 120) according to the surface treatment and aging (n = 15): P: polishing; E: acid etching with HF; A: aluminum oxide blasting; S: self-etching ceramic primer. The specimens were silanized, then cylinders of light-curing characterization material (Vita Enamic Stain, 1.6 mm diameter x 2 mm height) were fabricated, followed by glazing. The specimens were subsequently immersed in distilled water for 24 h and subjected to the µSBS test using a universal testing machine (load cell 0.5 mm/min, 50 kgf) or tested after thermocycling for 10,000 cycles in water (5°C-55°C). After treatment, the specimen surfaces were analyzed using SEM, with failure types defined as adhesive, predominantly adhesive, or cohesive. The data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most frequent failure type was predominantly adhesive between ceramic and the characterization layer. There were statistically significant differences between the surface treatments (p < 0.05). Thermocycling did not lead to statistically signifcant different results (p > 0.05). For groups P and A, a sharp decrease in SBS was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The absence of surface treatment drastically reduced the microshear bond strength between the ceramic and the characterization layer. Conditioning with 5% hydrofluoric acid for 60 s is the most suitable treatment for adhesion of the characterization layer to hybrid ceramic.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":"23 5","pages":"429-435"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b2000235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Purpose: Using the microshear bond strength (µSBS) test, this study investigated the bond strength between a hybrid ceramic and the extrinsic characterization layer after different ceramic surface treatments.

Materials and methods: Hybrid ceramic blocks (Vita Enamic, Vita Zahnfabrik) were sectioned and randomly divided into 4 groups (N = 120) according to the surface treatment and aging (n = 15): P: polishing; E: acid etching with HF; A: aluminum oxide blasting; S: self-etching ceramic primer. The specimens were silanized, then cylinders of light-curing characterization material (Vita Enamic Stain, 1.6 mm diameter x 2 mm height) were fabricated, followed by glazing. The specimens were subsequently immersed in distilled water for 24 h and subjected to the µSBS test using a universal testing machine (load cell 0.5 mm/min, 50 kgf) or tested after thermocycling for 10,000 cycles in water (5°C-55°C). After treatment, the specimen surfaces were analyzed using SEM, with failure types defined as adhesive, predominantly adhesive, or cohesive. The data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test (p < 0.05).

Results: The most frequent failure type was predominantly adhesive between ceramic and the characterization layer. There were statistically significant differences between the surface treatments (p < 0.05). Thermocycling did not lead to statistically signifcant different results (p > 0.05). For groups P and A, a sharp decrease in SBS was observed.

Conclusion: The absence of surface treatment drastically reduced the microshear bond strength between the ceramic and the characterization layer. Conditioning with 5% hydrofluoric acid for 60 s is the most suitable treatment for adhesion of the characterization layer to hybrid ceramic.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同表面处理对杂化陶瓷表征层结合强度的影响。
目的:采用微剪切键合强度(µSBS)测试,研究不同表面处理方式下杂化陶瓷与外源表征层之间的键合强度。材料与方法:将混合陶瓷块(Vita Enamic, Vita Zahnfabrik)按表面处理和时效程度随机分为4组(N = 120) (N = 15): P:抛光;E: HF酸蚀;A:氧化铝爆破;S:自腐蚀陶瓷底漆。将样品进行硅化处理,然后制作光固化表征材料圆柱体(Vita Enamic Stain,直径1.6 mm x 2 mm高),然后上釉。随后将样品浸泡在蒸馏水中24 h,并使用通用试验机(0.5 mm/min, 50 kgf)进行µSBS测试,或在水中(5°C-55°C)进行10,000次热循环测试。处理后,用扫描电镜对试样表面进行分析,失效类型定义为粘接、主要粘接或粘接。采用双因素方差分析,并进行Tukey检验(p < 0.05)。结果:最常见的失效类型主要是陶瓷与表征层之间的粘接。表面处理间差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。热循环组差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。P组和A组SBS急剧下降。结论:表面处理的缺失大大降低了陶瓷与表征层之间的微剪切结合强度。用5%氢氟酸调理60 s是表征层与杂化陶瓷粘附最合适的处理方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1