Comparación de la discapacidad entre trastornos mentales graves y comunes usando la escala WHODAS 2.0

IF 5.2 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Revista de psiquiatria y salud mental Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rpsm.2021.08.004
Elena Hernando-Merino , Enrique Baca-Garcia , Maria Luisa Barrigón
{"title":"Comparación de la discapacidad entre trastornos mentales graves y comunes usando la escala WHODAS 2.0","authors":"Elena Hernando-Merino ,&nbsp;Enrique Baca-Garcia ,&nbsp;Maria Luisa Barrigón","doi":"10.1016/j.rpsm.2021.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Mental disorders are among the leading causes of disability worldwide. Despite the fact that severe mental disorders (SMD) are associated with high disability, the impact of common mental disorders (CMD) is not negligible. In this work, we compare the disability measured with the WHODAS 2.0 scale of both diagnostic groups at the Mental Health Nurse facility.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Sociodemographic data, clinical diagnosis and disability scores were collected, using the WHODAS 2.0 scale, of the patients attended by the Mental Health specialist nurse at the Infanta Elena de Valdemoro Hospital (Madrid) and disability was compared in patients with SMD and CMD, using the Student <em>t</em> test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Our study sample consisted of 133 patients. Patients with CMD showed greater disability compared to patients with SMD. It was observed that the disability associated with CMD is higher, compared to SMD, this difference being significant for the domain of work (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001) and participation in society (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.041).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In this study we showed that the level of disability associated with CMD was higher in certain areas compared to SMD, this difference was of special relevance for the «Work» and «Participation» domains. This may serve to adapt the interventions aimed at these people and improve their quality of life.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21391,"journal":{"name":"Revista de psiquiatria y salud mental","volume":"15 3","pages":"Pages 205-210"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de psiquiatria y salud mental","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888989121000999","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Introduction

Mental disorders are among the leading causes of disability worldwide. Despite the fact that severe mental disorders (SMD) are associated with high disability, the impact of common mental disorders (CMD) is not negligible. In this work, we compare the disability measured with the WHODAS 2.0 scale of both diagnostic groups at the Mental Health Nurse facility.

Material and methods

Sociodemographic data, clinical diagnosis and disability scores were collected, using the WHODAS 2.0 scale, of the patients attended by the Mental Health specialist nurse at the Infanta Elena de Valdemoro Hospital (Madrid) and disability was compared in patients with SMD and CMD, using the Student t test.

Results

Our study sample consisted of 133 patients. Patients with CMD showed greater disability compared to patients with SMD. It was observed that the disability associated with CMD is higher, compared to SMD, this difference being significant for the domain of work (p < 0.001) and participation in society (p = 0.041).

Conclusions

In this study we showed that the level of disability associated with CMD was higher in certain areas compared to SMD, this difference was of special relevance for the «Work» and «Participation» domains. This may serve to adapt the interventions aimed at these people and improve their quality of life.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用WHODAS 2.0量表比较严重和常见精神障碍的残疾情况
精神障碍是全世界致残的主要原因之一。尽管严重精神障碍(SMD)与高度残疾相关,但普通精神障碍(CMD)的影响也不容忽视。在这项工作中,我们比较了在精神卫生护士设施的两个诊断组的WHODAS 2.0量表测量的残疾。资料与方法采用WHODAS 2.0量表收集马德里公主医院精神卫生专科护士就诊患者的社会人口学资料、临床诊断和残疾评分,并采用学生t检验比较SMD和CMD患者的残疾情况。结果我们的研究样本包括133例患者。与SMD患者相比,CMD患者表现出更大的残疾。据观察,与SMD相比,与CMD相关的残疾更高,这种差异在工作领域是显著的(p <0.001)和社会参与(p = 0.041)。在这项研究中,我们发现与CMD相关的残疾水平在某些领域比SMD更高,这种差异与“工作”和“参与”领域特别相关。这可能有助于调整针对这些人的干预措施,并改善他们的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
3.30%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The Spanish Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health (SJPMH), incorporated into ISSN 1888-9891, is the official scientific publication of the Spanish Society of Psychiatry and Mental Health. The journal focuses on studying mental illnesses, their pathological processes, and their psychosocial consequences, and aims to disseminate scientific advances in all areas related to mental health and illness. SJPMH accepts unpublished works on psychiatry and mental health, including their medical and social implications. The journal provides space for research in the biological, clinical, and psychosocial fields. Manuscripts undergo peer-review by external reviewers before being accepted for publication. SJPMH is indexed in Index Medicus/Medline, IBECS, Social Sciences Citation Index Journal Citation Reports/Social Sciences Edition, and Current Contents/Social and Behavioral Sciences.
期刊最新文献
Schizophrenia and the COVID-19 pandemic: A narrative review from the biomedical perspective. Volume alterations of the hippocampus and amygdala in patients with schizophrenia and persistent auditory hallucinations. Deep brain stimulation and digital monitoring for patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: A case series. Koro-like syndrome in Huntington's disease. Psychological impact of COVID-19 lockdown on a population with serious mental illness. A prospective cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1