Framingham Risk Score Is an Ineffective Screening Strategy for Coronary Heart Disease in Long-Term Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Survivors.

Clinical Hematology International Pub Date : 2020-06-12 eCollection Date: 2020-09-01 DOI:10.2991/chi.d.200508.001
Natasha A Jain, Marcus Y Chen, Sujata Shanbhag, Prathima Anandi, Xin Tian, Sawa Ito, Priyanka A Pophali, Kimberly Doucette, Robert Q Le, Upneet Chawla, Eleftheria Koklanaris, Richard W Childs, A John Barrett, Minoo Battiwalla
{"title":"Framingham Risk Score Is an Ineffective Screening Strategy for Coronary Heart Disease in Long-Term Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Survivors.","authors":"Natasha A Jain,&nbsp;Marcus Y Chen,&nbsp;Sujata Shanbhag,&nbsp;Prathima Anandi,&nbsp;Xin Tian,&nbsp;Sawa Ito,&nbsp;Priyanka A Pophali,&nbsp;Kimberly Doucette,&nbsp;Robert Q Le,&nbsp;Upneet Chawla,&nbsp;Eleftheria Koklanaris,&nbsp;Richard W Childs,&nbsp;A John Barrett,&nbsp;Minoo Battiwalla","doi":"10.2991/chi.d.200508.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Long-term allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) survivors suffer an elevated risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). We conducted a prospective, nonrandomized, cross-sectional study to screen asymptomatic survivors at a single allo-HCT center using cardiac computed tomography (CT) involving coronary CT angiography (CCTA) and the coronary artery calcium (CAC) score. Seventy-nine subjects with a median age of 39 years at allo-HCT and a median follow-up interval of 8 years were evaluated for CHD by Framingham Risk Score (FRS) and cardiac CT. CHD was detected in 33 of 79 (42%) subjects; 91% of lesions were nonobstructive, 19.5% of were noncalcified and 30% had associated valvular calcification. Overall, CAC was significantly superior to FRS in detecting early CHD in allo-HCT survivors [∆C = 0.25; <i>P</i> < 0.0001]. While both FRS and CAC were highly, >95% specific, FRS had a sensitivity, positive and negative predictive values of only 28% (95% CI, 14%-47%), 90% (95% CI, 55%-100%) and 60% (95% CI, 47%-73%), respectively. In contrast, the sensitivity, positive and negative predictive values of CAC were 78% (95% CI, 60%-91%), 96% (95% CI, 80%-100%) and 83% (95% CI, 69%-93%), respectively. Significantly, cardiac CT detected CHD in 23 of the 68 (34%) survivors deemed to have a low Framingham risk. Radiation exposure during cardiac CT was negligible, and there were no adverse events. In conclusion, CAC score with or without CCTA is a safe, feasible and sensitive screening technique for CHD. The FRS greatly underestimates CHD in allo-HCT survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":10368,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Hematology International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1b/2c/CHI-2-3-109.PMC8432330.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Hematology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/chi.d.200508.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Long-term allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) survivors suffer an elevated risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). We conducted a prospective, nonrandomized, cross-sectional study to screen asymptomatic survivors at a single allo-HCT center using cardiac computed tomography (CT) involving coronary CT angiography (CCTA) and the coronary artery calcium (CAC) score. Seventy-nine subjects with a median age of 39 years at allo-HCT and a median follow-up interval of 8 years were evaluated for CHD by Framingham Risk Score (FRS) and cardiac CT. CHD was detected in 33 of 79 (42%) subjects; 91% of lesions were nonobstructive, 19.5% of were noncalcified and 30% had associated valvular calcification. Overall, CAC was significantly superior to FRS in detecting early CHD in allo-HCT survivors [∆C = 0.25; P < 0.0001]. While both FRS and CAC were highly, >95% specific, FRS had a sensitivity, positive and negative predictive values of only 28% (95% CI, 14%-47%), 90% (95% CI, 55%-100%) and 60% (95% CI, 47%-73%), respectively. In contrast, the sensitivity, positive and negative predictive values of CAC were 78% (95% CI, 60%-91%), 96% (95% CI, 80%-100%) and 83% (95% CI, 69%-93%), respectively. Significantly, cardiac CT detected CHD in 23 of the 68 (34%) survivors deemed to have a low Framingham risk. Radiation exposure during cardiac CT was negligible, and there were no adverse events. In conclusion, CAC score with or without CCTA is a safe, feasible and sensitive screening technique for CHD. The FRS greatly underestimates CHD in allo-HCT survivors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
弗雷明汉风险评分对长期同种异体造血细胞移植幸存者冠心病筛查无效。
长期同种异体造血细胞移植幸存者患冠心病(CHD)的风险升高。我们进行了一项前瞻性、非随机、横断面研究,利用心脏计算机断层扫描(CT),包括冠状动脉CT血管造影(CCTA)和冠状动脉钙(CAC)评分,在单一的异位hct中心筛查无症状幸存者。79名受试者的中位年龄为39岁,中位随访间隔为8年,通过Framingham风险评分(FRS)和心脏CT评估冠心病。79例受试者中有33例(42%)检测到冠心病;91%的病变为非阻塞性,19.5%的病变为非钙化,30%的病变伴有瓣膜钙化。总体而言,CAC在检测同种异体hct幸存者早期冠心病方面明显优于FRS[∆C = 0.25;P < 0.0001]。虽然FRS和CAC的特异性都很高,>95%,但FRS的敏感性,阳性和阴性预测值分别仅为28% (95% CI, 14%-47%), 90% (95% CI, 55%-100%)和60% (95% CI, 47%-73%)。相比之下,CAC的敏感性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为78% (95% CI, 60%-91%)、96% (95% CI, 80%-100%)和83% (95% CI, 69%-93%)。值得注意的是,68名幸存者中有23名(34%)被认为具有低Framingham风险,心脏CT检测出冠心病。心脏CT期间的辐射暴露可以忽略不计,没有不良事件。综上所述,CAC评分加或不加CCTA是一种安全、可行、灵敏的冠心病筛查技术。FRS大大低估了同种hct幸存者的冠心病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Evolving Role of Bridging Therapy during CAR-T Therapy How I treat newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia Elranatamab treatment in a multiple myeloma patient undergoing renal dialysis Outcomes of Autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with primary refractory Diffuse Large B-cell lymphoma who demonstrate chemosensitivity to salvage chemotherapy Outpatient CAR T-Cell Therapy as Standard of Care: Current Perspectives and Considerations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1