The safety, tolerability and mortality reduction efficacy of remdesivir; based on randomized clinical trials, observational and case studies reported safety outcomes: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety Pub Date : 2021-09-24 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20420986211042517
Chenchula Santenna, Kota Vidyasagar, Krishna Chaitanya Amarneni, Sai Nikhila Ghanta, Balakrishnan Sadasivam, Saman Pathan, R Padmavathi
{"title":"The safety, tolerability and mortality reduction efficacy of remdesivir; based on randomized clinical trials, observational and case studies reported safety outcomes: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Chenchula Santenna,&nbsp;Kota Vidyasagar,&nbsp;Krishna Chaitanya Amarneni,&nbsp;Sai Nikhila Ghanta,&nbsp;Balakrishnan Sadasivam,&nbsp;Saman Pathan,&nbsp;R Padmavathi","doi":"10.1177/20420986211042517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Remdesivir, an experimental antiviral drug has shown to inhibit severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), both <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i>. The present systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to quantify the safety and tolerability of remdesivir, based on safety outcome findings from randomized controlled trials, observational studies and case reports of remdesivir in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We have performed a systematic search in the PubMed, Google Scholar and Cochrane Library using specific keywords such as 'COVID-19' OR 'SARS CoV-2' AND 'Remdesivir'. The study endpoints include total adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), grade 3 and grade 4 AEs, mortality and drug tolerability. Statistical analysis was carried out by using Revman 5.4 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total 15 studies were included for systematic review, but only 5 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) (<i>n</i> = 13,622) were included for meta-analysis. Visual inspection of the forest plots for remdesivir 10-day <i>versus</i> placebo and remdesivir 10-day <i>versus</i> 5-day groups revealed that there is a significant difference in SAEs [10-day remdesivir <i>versus</i> control (odds ratio [OR] = 0.55, 0.40-0.74) <i>p</i> = 0.0001; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%; 10-day remdesivir <i>versus</i> 5-day remdesivir (OR = 0.56, 0.38-0.84) <i>p</i> = 0.005; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 13%]. In grade 4 AEs, there is a significant difference in 10-day remdesivir <i>versus</i> control (OR = 0.32, 0.19-0.54) <i>p</i> = 0.0001; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%, but not in comparison to 5-day remdesivir (OR = 0.95, 0.59-1.54) <i>p</i> = 0.85; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%. But there is no significant difference in grade 3 AEs [remdesivir 10 day <i>versus</i> control (OR = 0.81, 0.59-1.11) <i>p</i> = 0.19; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%; 10-day remdesivir <i>versus</i> 5-day remdesivir (OR = 1.24, 0.86-1.80) <i>p</i> = 0.25; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%], in total AEs [remdesivir 10 day <i>versus</i> control (OR = 1.07, 0.66-1.75) <i>p</i> = 0.77; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 79%; remdesivir 10 day <i>versus</i> 5 day (OR = 1.08, 0.70-1.68) <i>p</i> = 0.73; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 54%)], in mortality [10-day remdesivir <i>versus</i> control (OR = 0.93, 0.80-1.08) <i>p</i> = 0.32; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%; 10-day remdesivir <i>versus</i> 5-day remdesivir (OR = 1.39, 0.73-2.62) <i>p</i> = 0.32; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%)] and tolerability [remdesivir 10 day <i>versus</i> control (OR = 1.05, 0.51-2.18) <i>p</i> = 0.89; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 65%, 10-day remdesivir <i>versus</i> 5-day remdesivir (OR = 0.86, 0.18-4.01) <i>p</i> = 0.85; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 78%].</p><p><strong>Discussion & conclusion: </strong>Ten-day remdesivir was a safe antiviral agent but not tolerable over control in the hospitalized COVID-19 patients with a need of administration cautiousness for grade 3 AEs. There was no added benefit of 10- or 5-day remdesivir in reducing mortality over placebo. To avoid SAEs, we suggest for prior monitoring of liver function tests (LFT), renal function tests (RFT), complete blood count (CBC) and serum electrolytes for those with preexisting hepatic and renal impairments and patients receiving concomitant hepatotoxic or nephrotoxic drugs. Furthermore, a number of RCTs of remdesivir in COVID-19 patients are suggested.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>Ten-day remdesivir is a safe antiviral drug with common adverse events in comparison to placebo.The rate of serious adverse events and grade 3 adverse events were significantly lower in 10-day remdesivir in comparison to placebo/5-day remdesivir.There was no significant difference in the rate of tolerability and mortality reduction in 10-day remdesivir over placebo/5-day remdesivir.There were no new safety signals reported in vulnerable populations, paediatric, pregnant and lactating women.</p>","PeriodicalId":23012,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/76/15/10.1177_20420986211042517.PMC8477695.pdf","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20420986211042517","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Introduction: Remdesivir, an experimental antiviral drug has shown to inhibit severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), both in vitro and in vivo. The present systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to quantify the safety and tolerability of remdesivir, based on safety outcome findings from randomized controlled trials, observational studies and case reports of remdesivir in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients.

Methods: We have performed a systematic search in the PubMed, Google Scholar and Cochrane Library using specific keywords such as 'COVID-19' OR 'SARS CoV-2' AND 'Remdesivir'. The study endpoints include total adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), grade 3 and grade 4 AEs, mortality and drug tolerability. Statistical analysis was carried out by using Revman 5.4 software.

Results: Total 15 studies were included for systematic review, but only 5 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) (n = 13,622) were included for meta-analysis. Visual inspection of the forest plots for remdesivir 10-day versus placebo and remdesivir 10-day versus 5-day groups revealed that there is a significant difference in SAEs [10-day remdesivir versus control (odds ratio [OR] = 0.55, 0.40-0.74) p = 0.0001; I 2 = 0%; 10-day remdesivir versus 5-day remdesivir (OR = 0.56, 0.38-0.84) p = 0.005; I 2 = 13%]. In grade 4 AEs, there is a significant difference in 10-day remdesivir versus control (OR = 0.32, 0.19-0.54) p = 0.0001; I 2 = 0%, but not in comparison to 5-day remdesivir (OR = 0.95, 0.59-1.54) p = 0.85; I 2 = 0%. But there is no significant difference in grade 3 AEs [remdesivir 10 day versus control (OR = 0.81, 0.59-1.11) p = 0.19; I 2 = 0%; 10-day remdesivir versus 5-day remdesivir (OR = 1.24, 0.86-1.80) p = 0.25; I 2 = 0%], in total AEs [remdesivir 10 day versus control (OR = 1.07, 0.66-1.75) p = 0.77; I 2 = 79%; remdesivir 10 day versus 5 day (OR = 1.08, 0.70-1.68) p = 0.73; I 2 = 54%)], in mortality [10-day remdesivir versus control (OR = 0.93, 0.80-1.08) p = 0.32; I 2 = 0%; 10-day remdesivir versus 5-day remdesivir (OR = 1.39, 0.73-2.62) p = 0.32; I 2 = 0%)] and tolerability [remdesivir 10 day versus control (OR = 1.05, 0.51-2.18) p = 0.89; I 2 = 65%, 10-day remdesivir versus 5-day remdesivir (OR = 0.86, 0.18-4.01) p = 0.85; I 2 = 78%].

Discussion & conclusion: Ten-day remdesivir was a safe antiviral agent but not tolerable over control in the hospitalized COVID-19 patients with a need of administration cautiousness for grade 3 AEs. There was no added benefit of 10- or 5-day remdesivir in reducing mortality over placebo. To avoid SAEs, we suggest for prior monitoring of liver function tests (LFT), renal function tests (RFT), complete blood count (CBC) and serum electrolytes for those with preexisting hepatic and renal impairments and patients receiving concomitant hepatotoxic or nephrotoxic drugs. Furthermore, a number of RCTs of remdesivir in COVID-19 patients are suggested.

Plain language summary: Ten-day remdesivir is a safe antiviral drug with common adverse events in comparison to placebo.The rate of serious adverse events and grade 3 adverse events were significantly lower in 10-day remdesivir in comparison to placebo/5-day remdesivir.There was no significant difference in the rate of tolerability and mortality reduction in 10-day remdesivir over placebo/5-day remdesivir.There were no new safety signals reported in vulnerable populations, paediatric, pregnant and lactating women.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
瑞德西韦的安全性、耐受性和降低死亡率效果基于随机临床试验,观察性研究和案例研究报告了安全性结果:更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
引言:瑞德西韦是一种实验性抗病毒药物,已在体外和体内显示出对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型(严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒)的抑制作用。根据2019冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)患者中瑞德西韦的随机对照试验、观察性研究和病例报告的安全性结果,对瑞德西韦进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以量化其安全性和耐受性。方法:我们在PubMed、Google Scholar和Cochrane图书馆使用“新冠肺炎”或“SARS CoV-2”和“Remdesivir”等特定关键词进行了系统搜索。研究终点包括总不良事件(AE)、严重不良事件(SAE)、3级和4级AE、死亡率和药物耐受性。采用Revman 5.4软件进行统计分析。结果:共有15项研究被纳入系统综述,但只有5项随机临床试验(RCT)(n=13622)被纳入荟萃分析。对瑞德西韦10天组与安慰剂组、瑞德西韦十天组与5天组的森林图进行目视检查,结果显示,严重不良事件有显著差异[10天瑞德西韦与对照组(比值比[OR]=0.55,0.40-0.74)p=0.0001;I 2=0%;10天瑞德西韦与5天瑞德西维尔(OR=0.56,0.38-0.84)p=0.005;i2=13%]。在4级AE中,10天瑞德西韦与对照组相比存在显著差异(OR=0.32,0.19-0.54)p=0.0001;I2=0%,但与5天瑞德西韦相比(OR=0.95,0.59-1.54)p=0.85;I 2=0%。但3级不良事件[瑞德西韦10天与对照组(OR=0.81,0.59-1.11)p=0.19;I2=0%;10天瑞德西韦与5天瑞德西维尔(OR=1.24,0.86-1.80)p=0.25;I2=0%],总不良事件[药物10天与控制组(OR=1.07,0.66-1.75)p=0.77;I2=79%;药物10天和5天(OR=1.08,0.70-1.68)p=0.73;I2=54%)]无显著差异,死亡率[瑞德西韦10天与对照组(OR=0.93,0.80-1.08)p=0.32;I2=0%;瑞德西韦与5天(OR=1.39,0.73-2.62)p=.32;I2=0%)]和耐受性[瑞德西维尔10天与控制组(OR=1.05,0.51-2.18)p=0.89;I2=65%,瑞德西韦和5天(OR=0.86,0.18-4.01)p=0.85;I2=78%]。讨论和结论:10天瑞德西韦是一种安全的抗病毒药物,但在需要谨慎给药治疗3级不良事件的住院新冠肺炎患者中不能容忍过度控制。与安慰剂相比,10天或5天的瑞德西韦在降低死亡率方面没有额外的益处。为了避免严重急性呼吸系统综合征,我们建议对已有肝肾功能损害的患者以及同时服用肝毒性或肾毒性药物的患者进行肝功能测试(LFT)、肾功能测试(RFT)、全血细胞计数(CBC)和血清电解质的预先监测。此外,建议对新冠肺炎患者进行一些瑞德西韦随机对照试验。简明总结:与安慰剂相比,十天瑞德西韦是一种安全的抗病毒药物,有常见的不良事件。与安慰剂/5天瑞德西韦相比,10天瑞德西维尔的严重不良事件和3级不良事件发生率显著降低。10天瑞德西韦的耐受性和死亡率降低率与安慰剂/5d瑞德西韦相比没有显著差异。在弱势人群、儿科、孕妇和哺乳期妇女中没有新的安全信号报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety
Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
31
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies pertaining to the safe use of drugs in patients. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in drug safety, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. The editors welcome articles of current interest on research across all areas of drug safety, including therapeutic drug monitoring, pharmacoepidemiology, adverse drug reactions, drug interactions, pharmacokinetics, pharmacovigilance, medication/prescribing errors, risk management, ethics and regulation.
期刊最新文献
Determining the optimum dose of remifentanil in combination with propofol for total intravenous anaesthesia in hysteroscopy under Narcotrend and SPI monitoring. The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance department in the pharmaceutical industry: results of an Italian national survey. Comparison of a single intravenous infusion of alfentanil or sufentanil combined with target-controlled infusion of propofol for daytime hysteroscopy: a randomized clinical trial. Governance of artificial intelligence and machine learning in pharmacovigilance: what works today and what more is needed? Patient-centric decision-making in supplements intake and disclosure in clinical practice: a novel SIDP-12 tool to prevent drug-supplement interaction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1