The Current Consideration, Approach, and Management in Postcesarean Delivery Pain Control: A Narrative Review.

IF 1.6 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anesthesiology Research and Practice Pub Date : 2021-09-18 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2021/2156918
L Sangkum, T Thamjamrassri, V Arnuntasupakul, T Chalacheewa
{"title":"The Current Consideration, Approach, and Management in Postcesarean Delivery Pain Control: A Narrative Review.","authors":"L Sangkum,&nbsp;T Thamjamrassri,&nbsp;V Arnuntasupakul,&nbsp;T Chalacheewa","doi":"10.1155/2021/2156918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Optimal postoperative analgesia has a significant impact on patient recovery and outcomes after cesarean delivery. Multimodal analgesia is the core principle for cesarean delivery and pain management. For a standard analgesic regimen, the use of long-acting neuraxial opioids (e.g., morphine) and adjunct drugs, such as scheduled acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, is recommended unless contraindicated. Oral or intravenous opioids should be reserved for breakthrough pain. In addition to the aforementioned use of multimodal analgesia, preoperative evaluation is critical to individualize the analgesic regimen according to the patient requirements. Risk factors for severe postoperative pain or analgesia-related adverse effects will require modifications to the standard analgesic regimen (e.g., the use of ketamine, gabapentinoids, or regional anesthetic techniques). Further investigation is required to determine analgesic drugs or dose alterations based on preoperative predictions for patients at risk of severe pain. Outcomes beyond pain and analgesic use, such as functional recovery, should be determined to evaluate analgesic treatment protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":7834,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology Research and Practice","volume":"2021 ","pages":"2156918"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8476264/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2156918","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Optimal postoperative analgesia has a significant impact on patient recovery and outcomes after cesarean delivery. Multimodal analgesia is the core principle for cesarean delivery and pain management. For a standard analgesic regimen, the use of long-acting neuraxial opioids (e.g., morphine) and adjunct drugs, such as scheduled acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, is recommended unless contraindicated. Oral or intravenous opioids should be reserved for breakthrough pain. In addition to the aforementioned use of multimodal analgesia, preoperative evaluation is critical to individualize the analgesic regimen according to the patient requirements. Risk factors for severe postoperative pain or analgesia-related adverse effects will require modifications to the standard analgesic regimen (e.g., the use of ketamine, gabapentinoids, or regional anesthetic techniques). Further investigation is required to determine analgesic drugs or dose alterations based on preoperative predictions for patients at risk of severe pain. Outcomes beyond pain and analgesic use, such as functional recovery, should be determined to evaluate analgesic treatment protocols.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
剖宫产后疼痛控制的当前考虑、方法和管理:叙述性回顾。
术后最佳镇痛对剖宫产术后患者的康复和预后有重要影响。多模式镇痛是剖宫产和疼痛管理的核心原则。对于标准的镇痛方案,推荐使用长效神经性阿片类药物(如吗啡)和辅助药物,如预定的对乙酰氨基酚和非甾体抗炎药,除非有禁忌。口服或静脉注射阿片类药物应保留用于突破性疼痛。除了上述使用多模式镇痛外,术前评估对于根据患者的需要个性化镇痛方案至关重要。术后严重疼痛或镇痛相关不良反应的危险因素需要修改标准的镇痛方案(例如,使用氯胺酮、加巴喷丁类药物或区域麻醉技术)。需要进一步的研究,以确定镇痛药物或剂量的改变,基于术前预测患者的严重疼痛的风险。疼痛和镇痛药使用之外的结果,如功能恢复,应确定以评估镇痛治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Laryngoscope-Guided Insertion and Standard Blind Insertion of the Laryngeal Mask Airway: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. The Impact of Diclofenac Suppositories on Post-Cesarean Section Pain: A Systematic Literature Review. A Comparison of the Effect of Two Doses of Oral Melatonin as Premedication on Orientation Score, Induction Compliance, and Emergency Agitation of Children Undergoing Elective Surgeries: A Double-Blinded Randomized Trial. Study the Effect of Intraperitoneal Dexamethasone, Dexmedetomidine, and Their Combination on PONV After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Triple-Blind Trial. Bispectral Index and Surgical Space Conditions in Day Surgery Benign Gynecological Laparoscopies: A Double-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1