Assessing the practicalities of joint snakebite and dog rabies control programs: Commonalities and potential pitfalls

IF 3.6 Q2 TOXICOLOGY Toxicon: X Pub Date : 2021-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.toxcx.2021.100084
Terence P. Scott , Sanjib K. Sharma , Ryan M. Wallace , Louis H. Nel , Samir K. Adhikari , Bernadette Abela-Ridder , S.M. Thumbi
{"title":"Assessing the practicalities of joint snakebite and dog rabies control programs: Commonalities and potential pitfalls","authors":"Terence P. Scott ,&nbsp;Sanjib K. Sharma ,&nbsp;Ryan M. Wallace ,&nbsp;Louis H. Nel ,&nbsp;Samir K. Adhikari ,&nbsp;Bernadette Abela-Ridder ,&nbsp;S.M. Thumbi","doi":"10.1016/j.toxcx.2021.100084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Both rabies and snakebite primarily affect underserved and impoverished communities globally, with an estimated 200,000 people dying from these diseases annually, and the greatest burden being in Africa and Asia. Both diseases have been neglected and have thus been denied appropriate prioritization, support, and interventions, and face many of the challenges common to all neglected tropical diseases (NTDs). In line with the call for integrated approaches between NTDs in the recent NTD Roadmap, we sought to build upon previous conceptualizations for an integrated approach by identifying the commonalities between snakebite and rabies to explore the feasibility of an integrated approach. While multiple areas for potential integration are identified, we highlight the potential pitfalls to integrating rabies and snakebite programs, considering the nuances that make each disease and its intervention program unique. We conclude that health system strengthening, and capacity building should be the focus of any integrated approach among NTDs, and that by strengthening overall health systems, both rabies and snakebite can advocate for further support from governments and stakeholders.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37124,"journal":{"name":"Toxicon: X","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/15/38/main.PMC8482506.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicon: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590171021000205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Both rabies and snakebite primarily affect underserved and impoverished communities globally, with an estimated 200,000 people dying from these diseases annually, and the greatest burden being in Africa and Asia. Both diseases have been neglected and have thus been denied appropriate prioritization, support, and interventions, and face many of the challenges common to all neglected tropical diseases (NTDs). In line with the call for integrated approaches between NTDs in the recent NTD Roadmap, we sought to build upon previous conceptualizations for an integrated approach by identifying the commonalities between snakebite and rabies to explore the feasibility of an integrated approach. While multiple areas for potential integration are identified, we highlight the potential pitfalls to integrating rabies and snakebite programs, considering the nuances that make each disease and its intervention program unique. We conclude that health system strengthening, and capacity building should be the focus of any integrated approach among NTDs, and that by strengthening overall health systems, both rabies and snakebite can advocate for further support from governments and stakeholders.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估蛇咬伤和狗狂犬病联合控制方案的可行性:共性和潜在的陷阱
狂犬病和蛇咬伤主要影响全球服务不足和贫困的社区,估计每年有20万人死于这些疾病,非洲和亚洲的负担最重。这两种疾病都被忽视了,因此没有得到适当的优先考虑、支持和干预,并面临着所有被忽视的热带病共同面临的许多挑战。根据最近的被忽视热带病路线图中对在被忽视热带病之间采取综合方法的呼吁,我们试图通过确定蛇咬伤和狂犬病之间的共性,在以前的综合方法概念的基础上,探索综合方法的可行性。虽然确定了多个潜在整合领域,但考虑到每种疾病及其干预计划的细微差别,我们强调了整合狂犬病和蛇咬伤计划的潜在陷阱。我们的结论是,加强卫生系统和能力建设应成为被忽视热带病的任何综合方法的重点,并且通过加强整体卫生系统,狂犬病和蛇咬伤都可以倡导政府和利益攸关方的进一步支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Toxicon: X
Toxicon: X Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Toxicology
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Stress levels, hematological condition, and productivity of plasma-producing horses used for snake antivenom manufacture: A comparison of two industrial bleeding methods Diagnosis of human envenoming by terrestrial venomous animals: Routine, advances, and perspectives Supplementation of polyclonal antibodies, developed against epitope-string toxin-specific peptide immunogens, to commercial polyvalent antivenom, shows improved neutralization of Indian Big Four and Naja kaouthia snake venoms Bioprospection of rattlesnake venom peptide fractions with anti-adipose and anti-insulin resistance activity in vitro A probabilistic hazard assessment for cyanobacterial toxins accounting for regional geography and water body trophic status
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1