Shape-Constrained Symbolic Regression—Improving Extrapolation with Prior Knowledge

IF 4.6 2区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Evolutionary Computation Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1162/evco_a_00294
G. Kronberger;F. O. de Franca;B. Burlacu;C. Haider;M. Kommenda
{"title":"Shape-Constrained Symbolic Regression—Improving Extrapolation with Prior Knowledge","authors":"G. Kronberger;F. O. de Franca;B. Burlacu;C. Haider;M. Kommenda","doi":"10.1162/evco_a_00294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigate the addition of constraints on the function image and its derivatives for the incorporation of prior knowledge in symbolic regression. The approach is called shape-constrained symbolic regression and allows us to enforce, for example, monotonicity of the function over selected inputs. The aim is to find models which conform to expected behavior and which have improved extrapolation capabilities. We demonstrate the feasibility of the idea and propose and compare two evolutionary algorithms for shape-constrained symbolic regression: (i) an extension of tree-based genetic programming which discards infeasible solutions in the selection step, and (ii) a two-population evolutionary algorithm that separates the feasible from the infeasible solutions. In both algorithms we use interval arithmetic to approximate bounds for models and their partial derivatives. The algorithms are tested on a set of 19 synthetic and four real-world regression problems. Both algorithms are able to identify models which conform to shape constraints which is not the case for the unmodified symbolic regression algorithms. However, the predictive accuracy of models with constraints is worse on the training set and the test set. Shape-constrained polynomial regression produces the best results for the test set but also significantly larger models.","PeriodicalId":50470,"journal":{"name":"Evolutionary Computation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolutionary Computation","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9808270/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

We investigate the addition of constraints on the function image and its derivatives for the incorporation of prior knowledge in symbolic regression. The approach is called shape-constrained symbolic regression and allows us to enforce, for example, monotonicity of the function over selected inputs. The aim is to find models which conform to expected behavior and which have improved extrapolation capabilities. We demonstrate the feasibility of the idea and propose and compare two evolutionary algorithms for shape-constrained symbolic regression: (i) an extension of tree-based genetic programming which discards infeasible solutions in the selection step, and (ii) a two-population evolutionary algorithm that separates the feasible from the infeasible solutions. In both algorithms we use interval arithmetic to approximate bounds for models and their partial derivatives. The algorithms are tested on a set of 19 synthetic and four real-world regression problems. Both algorithms are able to identify models which conform to shape constraints which is not the case for the unmodified symbolic regression algorithms. However, the predictive accuracy of models with constraints is worse on the training set and the test set. Shape-constrained polynomial regression produces the best results for the test set but also significantly larger models.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
形状约束符号回归——利用先验知识改进外推
我们研究了在函数图像及其导数上添加约束,以便在符号回归中引入先验知识。这种方法被称为形状约束符号回归,例如,它允许我们在选定的输入上强制函数的单调性。目的是找到符合预期行为并具有改进的外推能力的模型。我们证明了这一想法的可行性,并提出并比较了两种用于形状约束符号回归的进化算法:(i)基于树的遗传规划的扩展,它在选择步骤中丢弃了不可行的解,以及(ii)将可行解与不可行解分离的两种群进化算法。在这两种算法中,我们都使用区间算法来近似模型及其偏导数的边界。这些算法在19个合成问题和4个真实世界的回归问题上进行了测试。这两种算法都能够识别符合形状约束的模型,而未修改的符号回归算法则不是这样。然而,具有约束的模型在训练集和测试集上的预测精度较差。形状约束多项式回归为测试集产生了最好的结果,但也产生了明显更大的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Evolutionary Computation
Evolutionary Computation 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
1.50%
发文量
20
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Evolutionary Computation is a leading journal in its field. It provides an international forum for facilitating and enhancing the exchange of information among researchers involved in both the theoretical and practical aspects of computational systems drawing their inspiration from nature, with particular emphasis on evolutionary models of computation such as genetic algorithms, evolutionary strategies, classifier systems, evolutionary programming, and genetic programming. It welcomes articles from related fields such as swarm intelligence (e.g. Ant Colony Optimization and Particle Swarm Optimization), and other nature-inspired computation paradigms (e.g. Artificial Immune Systems). As well as publishing articles describing theoretical and/or experimental work, the journal also welcomes application-focused papers describing breakthrough results in an application domain or methodological papers where the specificities of the real-world problem led to significant algorithmic improvements that could possibly be generalized to other areas.
期刊最新文献
Genetic Programming for Automatically Evolving Multiple Features to Classification. A Tri-Objective Method for Bi-Objective Feature Selection in Classification. Preliminary Analysis of Simple Novelty Search. IOHexperimenter: Benchmarking Platform for Iterative Optimization Heuristics. Pflacco: Feature-Based Landscape Analysis of Continuous and Constrained Optimization Problems in Python.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1