Self-Efficacy Is a Modifiable Factor Associated with Frailty in Those with Minor Stroke: Secondary Analysis of 200 Cohort Respondents.

IF 2 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-10-08 DOI:10.1159/000519311
Abodunrin Quadri Aminu, Roderick Wondergem, Yvonne Van Zaalen, Martijn Pisters
{"title":"Self-Efficacy Is a Modifiable Factor Associated with Frailty in Those with Minor Stroke: Secondary Analysis of 200 Cohort Respondents.","authors":"Abodunrin Quadri Aminu,&nbsp;Roderick Wondergem,&nbsp;Yvonne Van Zaalen,&nbsp;Martijn Pisters","doi":"10.1159/000519311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Owing to the improvement in acute care, there has been an increase in the number of people surviving stroke and living with its impairments. Frailty is common in people with stroke and has a significant impact on the prognosis after stroke. To reduce frailty progression, potentially modifiable factors should be identified. Increasing levels of self-efficacy influence both behaviour and physical functioning, and therefore it could be a potential target to prevent frailty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective cohort study that involved the secondary analysis of the RISE data to examine the relationship between self-efficacy and frailty. The RISE study is a longitudinal study that consists of 200 adults aged 18+ years after their first stroke event. Data were collected from the respondents at 3 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months after their discharge from the hospital. Frailty was assessed using the multidimensional frailty index with scores ranging from 0 to 1, and self-efficacy was assessed using the SESx scale, which was dichotomized as low/moderate or high. Frailty trajectories were examined using the repeated linear model. The generalized estimating equation was used to examine the relationship between self-efficacy and frailty at baseline and in the future (6-24 months). The B coefficients were reported at 95% CI before and after adjusting for potential confounders (age, gender, stroke severity, education, and social support).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 200 responses were analysed, and the mean age of the respondents was 67.78 ± 11.53. Females made up 64% of the sample, and the mean frailty score at baseline was 0.17 ± 0.09. After adjusting for confounders, respondents with low self-efficacy had an approximately 5% increase in their frailty scores at baseline and in the 24-month follow-up period compared to those with high self-efficacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The result from this study showed that self-efficacy was significantly associated with frailty after stroke. Our findings suggest that self-efficacy may play a role in frailty progression among stroke survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":45709,"journal":{"name":"Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra","volume":"11 3","pages":"99-105"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1a/60/cee-0011-0099.PMC8543288.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000519311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Owing to the improvement in acute care, there has been an increase in the number of people surviving stroke and living with its impairments. Frailty is common in people with stroke and has a significant impact on the prognosis after stroke. To reduce frailty progression, potentially modifiable factors should be identified. Increasing levels of self-efficacy influence both behaviour and physical functioning, and therefore it could be a potential target to prevent frailty.

Methods: This is a prospective cohort study that involved the secondary analysis of the RISE data to examine the relationship between self-efficacy and frailty. The RISE study is a longitudinal study that consists of 200 adults aged 18+ years after their first stroke event. Data were collected from the respondents at 3 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months after their discharge from the hospital. Frailty was assessed using the multidimensional frailty index with scores ranging from 0 to 1, and self-efficacy was assessed using the SESx scale, which was dichotomized as low/moderate or high. Frailty trajectories were examined using the repeated linear model. The generalized estimating equation was used to examine the relationship between self-efficacy and frailty at baseline and in the future (6-24 months). The B coefficients were reported at 95% CI before and after adjusting for potential confounders (age, gender, stroke severity, education, and social support).

Results: A total of 200 responses were analysed, and the mean age of the respondents was 67.78 ± 11.53. Females made up 64% of the sample, and the mean frailty score at baseline was 0.17 ± 0.09. After adjusting for confounders, respondents with low self-efficacy had an approximately 5% increase in their frailty scores at baseline and in the 24-month follow-up period compared to those with high self-efficacy.

Conclusion: The result from this study showed that self-efficacy was significantly associated with frailty after stroke. Our findings suggest that self-efficacy may play a role in frailty progression among stroke survivors.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自我效能感是与轻度中风患者虚弱相关的可改变因素:对200名队列受访者的二次分析。
背景:由于急性照护的改善,中风患者存活和伴随其损伤的人数有所增加。虚弱在中风患者中很常见,对中风后的预后有显著影响。为了减少衰弱的进展,应该确定潜在的可改变因素。自我效能感水平的提高会影响行为和身体机能,因此它可能是预防虚弱的潜在目标。方法:这是一项前瞻性队列研究,对RISE数据进行二次分析,以检验自我效能感与虚弱之间的关系。RISE研究是一项纵向研究,由200名首次中风后18岁以上的成年人组成。在受访者出院后3周、6个月、12个月和24个月收集数据。脆弱性采用多维脆弱性指数进行评估,得分范围从0到1,自我效能感采用SESx量表进行评估,该量表分为低/中或高。使用重复线性模型检查脆弱轨迹。采用广义估计方程检验自我效能与虚弱在基线和未来(6-24个月)之间的关系。在调整潜在混杂因素(年龄、性别、中风严重程度、教育程度和社会支持)之前和之后,以95% CI报告B系数。结果:共分析问卷200份,平均年龄67.78±11.53岁。女性占64%,基线时的平均衰弱评分为0.17±0.09。在对混杂因素进行调整后,与自我效能高的受访者相比,自我效能低的受访者在基线和24个月的随访期间的虚弱得分增加了约5%。结论:本研究结果显示,自我效能感与脑卒中后虚弱有显著相关。我们的研究结果表明,自我效能感可能在中风幸存者的虚弱进展中发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra
Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: This open access and online-only journal publishes original articles covering the entire spectrum of stroke and cerebrovascular research, drawing from a variety of specialties such as neurology, internal medicine, surgery, radiology, epidemiology, cardiology, hematology, psychology and rehabilitation. Offering an international forum, it meets the growing need for sophisticated, up-to-date scientific information on clinical data, diagnostic testing, and therapeutic issues. The journal publishes original contributions, reviews of selected topics as well as clinical investigative studies. All aspects related to clinical advances are considered, while purely experimental work appears only if directly relevant to clinical issues. Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra provides additional contents based on reviewed and accepted submissions to the main journal Cerebrovascular Diseases.
期刊最新文献
Safety and Efficacy of Thrombectomy in Vietnamese Stroke Patients Selected Through Perfusion Imaging With an Onset Time Between 6-24 Hours. Intracerebral hemorrhage. Clinical Profile of Stroke Chameleons Receiving Intravenous Thrombolysis: Insights from a Single-Center Experience. Waveform Analysis of STA-MCA Bypass graft in Revascularization Surgery for Moyamoya Disease. Predictors for Adherence to Recommended Anticoagulation after Stroke Unit Discharge in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1