Musculoskeletal ambulation disability symptom complex as a risk factor of incident bone fragility fracture

IF 2.5 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.afos.2021.09.004
Ichiro Yoshii , Tatsumi Chijiwa , Naoya Sawada , Shohei Kokei
{"title":"Musculoskeletal ambulation disability symptom complex as a risk factor of incident bone fragility fracture","authors":"Ichiro Yoshii ,&nbsp;Tatsumi Chijiwa ,&nbsp;Naoya Sawada ,&nbsp;Shohei Kokei","doi":"10.1016/j.afos.2021.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Influence of presenting musculoskeletal ambulation disability symptom complex (MADS) on occurrence of bone fragility fracture (BFF) is investigated with retrospective cohort study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 931 subjects joined in the study. Subjects were selected as bone fragility risk positive in the fracture assessment tool questionnaire. Their assumed risk factors were harvested from the medical records and X-ray pictures. They were followed up at least 8 years consecutively, and occurrence of incident BFF was set as primary endpoint. Each assumed risk factor including MADS was evaluated using Cox regression analysis. Subjects were divided into 2 groups according to presence of MADS (G-MADS and G-noMADS). Adjusted hazard ratios between the 2 groups was evaluated using Cox regression analysis. The statistical procedures were performed before and after propensity score matching (PSM) procedures in order to make parallel with assumed risk factors.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Statistically significant risk factors within 5% were prevalent vertebral body fracture, disuse, MADS, cognitive disorder, hypertension, contracture, Parkinsonism, being female sex, hyperlipidemia, insomnia, T-score in the femoral neck ≤ −2.3, chronic kidney disease ≥ stage 2, chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases, glucocorticoid steroid administrated, and osteoarthritis in order of the adjusted hazard ratios (from highest to lowest). Adjusted hazard ratios between G-MADS and G-noMADS were 2.70 and 1.83 for before and after PSM, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>MADS demonstrated as a significant risk factor of BFF occurrence. In treating osteoporosis, fall risk should be aware of as well as bone fragility risk.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19701,"journal":{"name":"Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia","volume":"7 3","pages":"Pages 115-120"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/47/de/main.PMC8486644.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405525521000637","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives

Influence of presenting musculoskeletal ambulation disability symptom complex (MADS) on occurrence of bone fragility fracture (BFF) is investigated with retrospective cohort study.

Methods

A total of 931 subjects joined in the study. Subjects were selected as bone fragility risk positive in the fracture assessment tool questionnaire. Their assumed risk factors were harvested from the medical records and X-ray pictures. They were followed up at least 8 years consecutively, and occurrence of incident BFF was set as primary endpoint. Each assumed risk factor including MADS was evaluated using Cox regression analysis. Subjects were divided into 2 groups according to presence of MADS (G-MADS and G-noMADS). Adjusted hazard ratios between the 2 groups was evaluated using Cox regression analysis. The statistical procedures were performed before and after propensity score matching (PSM) procedures in order to make parallel with assumed risk factors.

Results

Statistically significant risk factors within 5% were prevalent vertebral body fracture, disuse, MADS, cognitive disorder, hypertension, contracture, Parkinsonism, being female sex, hyperlipidemia, insomnia, T-score in the femoral neck ≤ −2.3, chronic kidney disease ≥ stage 2, chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases, glucocorticoid steroid administrated, and osteoarthritis in order of the adjusted hazard ratios (from highest to lowest). Adjusted hazard ratios between G-MADS and G-noMADS were 2.70 and 1.83 for before and after PSM, respectively.

Conclusions

MADS demonstrated as a significant risk factor of BFF occurrence. In treating osteoporosis, fall risk should be aware of as well as bone fragility risk.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肌肉骨骼活动障碍症状复合体是发生脆性骨折的危险因素
目的通过回顾性队列研究,探讨出现肌肉骨骼活动障碍症状复合物(MADS)对脆性骨折(BFF)发生的影响。方法共纳入931名受试者。在骨折评估工具问卷中选择骨脆性风险阳性的受试者。他们假设的风险因素是从医疗记录和x光照片中获取的。他们至少连续随访8年,并以偶发闺蜜事件的发生为主要终点。采用Cox回归分析对包括MADS在内的每个假设危险因素进行评估。根据是否存在MADS分为G-MADS组和G-noMADS组。采用Cox回归分析评估两组间调整后的风险比。在倾向得分匹配(PSM)之前和之后进行统计程序,以便与假设的危险因素进行平行。结果5%以内具有统计学意义的危险因素为椎体骨折、失用、MADS、认知障碍、高血压、挛缩、帕金森病、女性、高脂血症、失眠、股骨颈t评分≤- 2.3、慢性肾病≥2期、慢性阻塞性肺病、使用糖皮质激素和骨关节炎(按调整后的危险比从高到低排序)。PSM前后G-MADS和G-noMADS的校正风险比分别为2.70和1.83。结论smads是BFF发生的重要危险因素。在治疗骨质疏松症时,既要注意跌倒风险,也要注意骨质疏松风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia
Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Geriatrics and Gerontology
自引率
5.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
66 days
期刊最新文献
Does intradiscal steroid injection accelerate the histological degeneration of the human disc? Surgery for spinal deformity with osteoporosis: Achieving successful fusion Verification of grip strength as an evaluation tool for locomotive syndrome in rheumatoid arthritis Effects of whole-body vibration on bone properties in type 2 diabetes model rats Choice of cemented or uncemented stems for displaced femoral neck fractures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1