The diagnostic indicators of gestational diabetes mellitus from second trimester to birth: a systematic review.

Daria Di Filippo, Thiyasha Wanniarachchi, Daniel Wei, Jennifer J Yang, Aoife Mc Sweeney, Alys Havard, Amanda Henry, Alec Welsh
{"title":"The diagnostic indicators of gestational diabetes mellitus from second trimester to birth: a systematic review.","authors":"Daria Di Filippo, Thiyasha Wanniarachchi, Daniel Wei, Jennifer J Yang, Aoife Mc Sweeney, Alys Havard, Amanda Henry, Alec Welsh","doi":"10.1186/s40842-021-00126-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is glucose intolerance first recognised during pregnancy. Both modalities and thresholds of the GDM diagnostic test, the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT), have varied widely over time and among countries. Additionally, OGTT limitations include inconsistency, poor patient tolerability, and questionable diagnostic reliability. Many biological parameters have been reported to be modified by GDM and could potentially be used as diagnostic indicators. This study aimed to 1) systematically explore biomarkers reported in the literature as differentiating GDM from healthy pregnancies 2) screen those indicators assessed against OGTT to propose OGTT alternatives.</p><p><strong>Main body: </strong>A systematic review of GDM diagnostic indicators was performed according to PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO registration CRD42020145499). Inclusion criteria were full-text, comprehensible English-language articles published January 2009-January 2021, where a biomarker (from blood, ultrasound, amniotic fluid, placenta) was compared between GDM and normal glucose tolerance (NGT) women from the second trimester onward to immediately postpartum. GDM diagnostic method had to be clearly specified, and the number of patients per study higher than 30 in total or 15 per group. Results were synthesised by biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 13,133 studies identified in initial screening, 174 studies (135,801 participants) were included. One hundred and twenty-nine studies described blood analytes, one amniotic fluid analytes, 27 ultrasound features, 17 post-natal features. Among the biomarkers evaluated in exploratory studies, Adiponectin, AFABP, Betatrophin, CRP, Cystatin-C, Delta-Neutrophil Index, GGT, TNF-A were those demonstrating statistically and clinically significant differences in substantial cohorts of patients (> 500). Regarding biomarkers assessed versus OGTT (i.e. potential OGTT alternatives) most promising were Leptin > 48.5 ng/ml, Ficolin3/adiponectin ratio ≥ 1.06, Chemerin/FABP > 0.71, and Ultrasound Gestational Diabetes Score > 4. These all demonstrated sensitivity and specificity > 80% in adequate sample sizes (> / = 100).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Numerous biomarkers may differentiate GDM from normoglycaemic pregnancy. Given the limitations of the OGTT and the lack of a gold standard for GDM diagnosis, advanced phase studies are needed to triangulate the most promising biomarkers. Further studies are also recommended to assess the sensitivity and specificity of promising biomarkers not yet assessed against OGTT.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO registration number CRD42020145499.</p>","PeriodicalId":56339,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Diabetes and Endocrinology","volume":"7 1","pages":"19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8504031/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Diabetes and Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40842-021-00126-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is glucose intolerance first recognised during pregnancy. Both modalities and thresholds of the GDM diagnostic test, the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT), have varied widely over time and among countries. Additionally, OGTT limitations include inconsistency, poor patient tolerability, and questionable diagnostic reliability. Many biological parameters have been reported to be modified by GDM and could potentially be used as diagnostic indicators. This study aimed to 1) systematically explore biomarkers reported in the literature as differentiating GDM from healthy pregnancies 2) screen those indicators assessed against OGTT to propose OGTT alternatives.

Main body: A systematic review of GDM diagnostic indicators was performed according to PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO registration CRD42020145499). Inclusion criteria were full-text, comprehensible English-language articles published January 2009-January 2021, where a biomarker (from blood, ultrasound, amniotic fluid, placenta) was compared between GDM and normal glucose tolerance (NGT) women from the second trimester onward to immediately postpartum. GDM diagnostic method had to be clearly specified, and the number of patients per study higher than 30 in total or 15 per group. Results were synthesised by biomarkers.

Results: Of 13,133 studies identified in initial screening, 174 studies (135,801 participants) were included. One hundred and twenty-nine studies described blood analytes, one amniotic fluid analytes, 27 ultrasound features, 17 post-natal features. Among the biomarkers evaluated in exploratory studies, Adiponectin, AFABP, Betatrophin, CRP, Cystatin-C, Delta-Neutrophil Index, GGT, TNF-A were those demonstrating statistically and clinically significant differences in substantial cohorts of patients (> 500). Regarding biomarkers assessed versus OGTT (i.e. potential OGTT alternatives) most promising were Leptin > 48.5 ng/ml, Ficolin3/adiponectin ratio ≥ 1.06, Chemerin/FABP > 0.71, and Ultrasound Gestational Diabetes Score > 4. These all demonstrated sensitivity and specificity > 80% in adequate sample sizes (> / = 100).

Conclusions: Numerous biomarkers may differentiate GDM from normoglycaemic pregnancy. Given the limitations of the OGTT and the lack of a gold standard for GDM diagnosis, advanced phase studies are needed to triangulate the most promising biomarkers. Further studies are also recommended to assess the sensitivity and specificity of promising biomarkers not yet assessed against OGTT.

Trial registration: PROSPERO registration number CRD42020145499.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从怀孕后三个月到分娩的妊娠糖尿病诊断指标:系统综述。
背景:妊娠糖尿病(GDM)是指在怀孕期间首次发现的葡萄糖不耐受。GDM 诊断测试--口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)--的模式和阈值随着时间的推移和国家的不同而有很大差异。此外,OGTT 的局限性还包括不一致性、患者耐受性差以及诊断可靠性值得怀疑。据报道,许多生物参数会因 GDM 而改变,因此有可能被用作诊断指标。本研究旨在:1)系统探讨文献中报道的可区分 GDM 和健康妊娠的生物标志物;2)筛选与 OGTT 对照评估的指标,提出 OGTT 的替代方案:根据PRISMA指南(PROSPERO注册号CRD42020145499)对GDM诊断指标进行了系统综述。纳入标准为2009年1月至2021年1月发表的全文可理解的英文文章,这些文章比较了GDM和正常糖耐量(NGT)妇女从妊娠后三个月到产后不久的生物标志物(来自血液、超声波、羊水、胎盘)。GDM 诊断方法必须明确,且每项研究的患者人数必须超过 30 人或每组 15 人。研究结果按生物标志物进行综合:在初步筛选出的 13,133 项研究中,有 174 项研究(135,801 名参与者)被纳入。129项研究描述了血液分析物,1项描述了羊水分析物,27项描述了超声波特征,17项描述了产后特征。在探索性研究中评估的生物标志物中,脂肪连素、AFABP、Betatrophin、CRP、胱抑素-C、Delta-中性粒细胞指数、GGT、TNF-A 是在大量患者群(大于 500 人)中显示出统计学和临床显著差异的生物标志物。与 OGTT 相比评估的生物标志物(即潜在的 OGTT 替代物)中,最有希望的是瘦素 > 48.5 ng/ml、Ficolin3/脂联素比率≥ 1.06、Chemerin/FABP > 0.71 和超声妊娠糖尿病评分 > 4。在样本量充足(> / = 100)的情况下,这些指标的灵敏度和特异性均大于 80%:结论:许多生物标志物可以区分 GDM 和正常血糖妊娠。鉴于 OGTT 的局限性和 GDM 诊断金标准的缺乏,需要进行晚期研究以确定最有前途的生物标志物。此外,还建议开展进一步研究,以评估尚未与 OGTT 对照评估的有前景的生物标志物的敏感性和特异性:PROSPERO注册号:CRD42020145499。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Diabetes and Endocrinology is an open access journal publishing within the field of diabetes and endocrine disease. The journal aims to provide a widely available resource for people working within the field of diabetes and endocrinology, in order to improve the care of people affected by these conditions. The audience includes, but is not limited to, physicians, researchers, nurses, nutritionists, pharmacists, podiatrists, psychologists, epidemiologists, exercise physiologists and health care researchers. Research articles include patient-based research (clinical trials, clinical studies, and others), translational research (translation of basic science to clinical practice, translation of clinical practice to policy and others), as well as epidemiology and health care research. Clinical articles include case reports, case seminars, consensus statements, clinical practice guidelines and evidence-based medicine. Only articles considered to contribute new knowledge to the field will be considered for publication.
期刊最新文献
Does EFSA statement on Monacolin content of nutraceutical combinations impair their lipid lowering effect? The LopiGLIK experience. Propylthiouracil-induced vasculitis with alveolar hemorrhage after 31 years of treatment: a case report. The impact of insulin resistance and glycaemic control on insulin-like growth factor-1 in patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study. Metanephrine mirage: distinguishing the phaeocopies, a case report and literature review. Microbial profile of diabetic foot osteomyelitis from the northwest of England.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1