Adverse childhood experiences predict reaction to multiple sclerosis diagnosis.

IF 1.7 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Health Psychology Open Pub Date : 2021-10-21 eCollection Date: 2021-07-01 DOI:10.1177/20551029211052830
Tehila Eilam-Stock, Jon Links, Nabil Z Khan, Tamar E Bacon, Guadalupe Zuniga, Lisa Laing, Carrie Sammarco, Kathleen Sherman, Leigh Charvet
{"title":"Adverse childhood experiences predict reaction to multiple sclerosis diagnosis.","authors":"Tehila Eilam-Stock,&nbsp;Jon Links,&nbsp;Nabil Z Khan,&nbsp;Tamar E Bacon,&nbsp;Guadalupe Zuniga,&nbsp;Lisa Laing,&nbsp;Carrie Sammarco,&nbsp;Kathleen Sherman,&nbsp;Leigh Charvet","doi":"10.1177/20551029211052830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>At the time of multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis, identifying those at risk for poorer health-related quality of life and emotional well-being can be a critical consideration for treatment planning. This study aimed to test whether adverse childhood experiences predict MS patients' health-related quality of life and emotional functioning at time of diagnosis and initial course of disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited patients at the time of new MS diagnosis to complete self-report surveys at baseline and a one-year follow-up. Questionnaires included the Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs), as well as the MS Knowledge Questionnaire (MSKQ), the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and Self-Management Screening (SeMaS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of <i>n</i> = 31 participants recently diagnosed with relapsing remitting MS (median EDSS = 1.0, age M = 33.84 ± 8.4 years) completed the study measures. The ACEs significantly predicted health-related quality of life (SF-36) at baseline (Adjusted <i>R</i> <sup><i>2</i></sup> = 0.18, <i>p</i> = 0.011) and follow-up (Adjusted <i>R</i> <sup><i>2</i></sup> = 0.12, <i>p</i> = 0.03), baseline scores on the SeMaS Depression scale (Adjusted <i>R</i> <sup><i>2</i></sup> = 0.19, <i>p</i> = 0.008), as well as follow-up scores on the SeMaS Anxiety (Adjusted <i>R</i> <sup><i>2</i></sup> = 0.19, <i>p</i> = 0.014) and SeMaS Depression (Adjusted <i>R</i> <sup><i>2</i></sup> = 0.14, <i>p</i> = 0.036) scales. Importantly, increased ACEs scores were predictive of increased anxiety at the one-year follow-up assessment, compared to baseline.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Childhood adversity predicts health-related quality of life and emotional well-being at time of MS diagnosis and over the initial course of the disease. Measured using a brief screening inventory (ACEs), routine administration may be useful for identifying patients in need of increased supportive services.</p>","PeriodicalId":55856,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Open","volume":"8 2","pages":"20551029211052830"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4b/a2/10.1177_20551029211052830.PMC8543585.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20551029211052830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objective: At the time of multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis, identifying those at risk for poorer health-related quality of life and emotional well-being can be a critical consideration for treatment planning. This study aimed to test whether adverse childhood experiences predict MS patients' health-related quality of life and emotional functioning at time of diagnosis and initial course of disease.

Methods: We recruited patients at the time of new MS diagnosis to complete self-report surveys at baseline and a one-year follow-up. Questionnaires included the Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs), as well as the MS Knowledge Questionnaire (MSKQ), the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and Self-Management Screening (SeMaS).

Results: A total of n = 31 participants recently diagnosed with relapsing remitting MS (median EDSS = 1.0, age M = 33.84 ± 8.4 years) completed the study measures. The ACEs significantly predicted health-related quality of life (SF-36) at baseline (Adjusted R 2 = 0.18, p = 0.011) and follow-up (Adjusted R 2 = 0.12, p = 0.03), baseline scores on the SeMaS Depression scale (Adjusted R 2 = 0.19, p = 0.008), as well as follow-up scores on the SeMaS Anxiety (Adjusted R 2 = 0.19, p = 0.014) and SeMaS Depression (Adjusted R 2 = 0.14, p = 0.036) scales. Importantly, increased ACEs scores were predictive of increased anxiety at the one-year follow-up assessment, compared to baseline.

Conclusions: Childhood adversity predicts health-related quality of life and emotional well-being at time of MS diagnosis and over the initial course of the disease. Measured using a brief screening inventory (ACEs), routine administration may be useful for identifying patients in need of increased supportive services.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不良童年经历预测多发性硬化症诊断的反应。
目的:在多发性硬化症(MS)诊断时,识别那些与健康相关的生活质量和情绪健康较差的风险可能是治疗计划的关键考虑因素。本研究旨在检验童年不良经历是否能预测MS患者在诊断和疾病初期的健康相关生活质量和情绪功能。方法:我们招募了新诊断为MS的患者,在基线和一年随访时完成自我报告调查。问卷包括不良童年经历(ACEs)、MS知识问卷(MSKQ)、36项简短健康调查(SF-36)和自我管理筛查(SeMaS)。结果:共有n = 31名最近诊断为复发缓解型MS的参与者(中位EDSS = 1.0,年龄M = 33.84±8.4岁)完成了研究措施。ace在基线(调整r2 = 0.18, p = 0.011)和随访(调整r2 = 0.12, p = 0.03)、SeMaS抑郁量表的基线得分(调整r2 = 0.19, p = 0.008)以及SeMaS焦虑量表(调整r2 = 0.19, p = 0.014)和SeMaS抑郁量表(调整r2 = 0.14, p = 0.036)的随访得分上显著预测健康相关生活质量(SF-36)。重要的是,与基线相比,在一年的随访评估中,ace分数的增加预示着焦虑的增加。结论:童年逆境预测健康相关的生活质量和情绪幸福感在MS诊断时和在疾病的初始过程中。使用简短筛查清单(ace)进行测量,常规管理可能有助于识别需要增加支持服务的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Psychology Open
Health Psychology Open Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Psychology Open (HPO) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access, online-only journal providing rapid publication. HPO is dedicated to publishing cutting-edge research in health psychology from around the world. HPO seeks to provide a platform for both traditional empirical analyses and more qualitative and/or critically oriented approaches to health psychology. All areas of health psychology are covered, but these topics are of particular interest: Clinical health psychology Critical health psychology Community health psychology Health psychology practice Health psychology through a social, cultural or regional lens The journal particularly favours papers that focus on health psychology in practice, including submissions concerning community and/or clinical applications and interventions. Review articles are also welcomed. There is no fixed limit to the length of manuscripts, which is normally strictly limited in other journals, for example HPO’s sister journal, Journal of Health Psychology (JHP). Studies published in this journal are required to obtain ethical approval from an Institutional Review Board. Such approval must include informed, signed consent by all research participants. Any manuscript not containing an explicit statement concerning ethical approval and informed consent will not be considered.
期刊最新文献
Development and initial validation of the multilingual Swiss version of the brief parental burnout scale. Bibliometric analysis of global research on psychological well-being, subjective burden, and psychosocial support of family caregivers of cancer patients. Tobacco harm perceptions, regulatory attitudes, and cessation intentions before and after the COVID-19 lockdown in California. Cognitive dysfunction and disturbed daily activities of people with dementia impact the psychological stress in family caregivers depending on their anxiety and depression severity. Changes in self-rated health, quality of life, and psychological flexibility among adults with overweight over a 24-month acceptance and commitment therapy-based lifestyle intervention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1