Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC): a cross-sectional survey.

IF 1.4 Q4 ONCOLOGY Pleura and Peritoneum Pub Date : 2021-06-21 eCollection Date: 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1515/pp-2021-0117
Geetu Bhandoria, Sohan Lal Solanki, Mrugank Bhavsar, Kalpana Balakrishnan, Cherukuri Bapuji, Nitin Bhorkar, Prashant Bhandarkar, Sameer Bhosale, Jigeeshu V Divatia, Anik Ghosh, Vikas Mahajan, Abraham Peedicayil, Praveen Nath, Snita Sinukumar, Robin Thambudorai, Ramakrishnan Ayloor Seshadri, Aditi Bhatt
{"title":"Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC): a cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Geetu Bhandoria,&nbsp;Sohan Lal Solanki,&nbsp;Mrugank Bhavsar,&nbsp;Kalpana Balakrishnan,&nbsp;Cherukuri Bapuji,&nbsp;Nitin Bhorkar,&nbsp;Prashant Bhandarkar,&nbsp;Sameer Bhosale,&nbsp;Jigeeshu V Divatia,&nbsp;Anik Ghosh,&nbsp;Vikas Mahajan,&nbsp;Abraham Peedicayil,&nbsp;Praveen Nath,&nbsp;Snita Sinukumar,&nbsp;Robin Thambudorai,&nbsp;Ramakrishnan Ayloor Seshadri,&nbsp;Aditi Bhatt","doi":"10.1515/pp-2021-0117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been questioned in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with/without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for peritoneal malignancies. This survey was performed to study clinicians' practice about ERAS in patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey, comprising 76 questions on elements of prehabilitation (n=11), preoperative (n=8), intraoperative (n=16) and postoperative (n=32) management, was conducted. The respondents included surgeons, anesthesiologists, and critical care specialists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 66% (136/206 clinicians contacted). Ninety-one percent of respondents reported implementing ERAS practices. There was encouraging adherence to implement the prehabilitation (76-95%), preoperative (50-94%), and intraoperative (55-90%) ERAS practices. Mechanical bowel preparation was being used by 84.5%. Intra-abdominal drains usage was 94.7%, intercostal drains by 77.9% respondents. Nasogastric drainage was used by 84% of practitioners. The average hospital stay was 10 days as reported by 50% of respondents. A working protocol and ERAS checklist have been designed, based on the results of our study, following recent ERAS-CRS-HIPEC guidelines. This protocol will be prospectively validated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most respondents were implementing ERAS practices for patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC, though as an extrapolation of colorectal and gynecological guidelines. The adoption of postoperative practices was relatively low compared to other perioperative practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":20231,"journal":{"name":"Pleura and Peritoneum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/pp-2021-0117","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pleura and Peritoneum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pp-2021-0117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Objectives: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been questioned in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with/without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for peritoneal malignancies. This survey was performed to study clinicians' practice about ERAS in patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC.

Methods: An online survey, comprising 76 questions on elements of prehabilitation (n=11), preoperative (n=8), intraoperative (n=16) and postoperative (n=32) management, was conducted. The respondents included surgeons, anesthesiologists, and critical care specialists.

Results: The response rate was 66% (136/206 clinicians contacted). Ninety-one percent of respondents reported implementing ERAS practices. There was encouraging adherence to implement the prehabilitation (76-95%), preoperative (50-94%), and intraoperative (55-90%) ERAS practices. Mechanical bowel preparation was being used by 84.5%. Intra-abdominal drains usage was 94.7%, intercostal drains by 77.9% respondents. Nasogastric drainage was used by 84% of practitioners. The average hospital stay was 10 days as reported by 50% of respondents. A working protocol and ERAS checklist have been designed, based on the results of our study, following recent ERAS-CRS-HIPEC guidelines. This protocol will be prospectively validated.

Conclusions: Most respondents were implementing ERAS practices for patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC, though as an extrapolation of colorectal and gynecological guidelines. The adoption of postoperative practices was relatively low compared to other perioperative practices.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
细胞减少手术(CRS)和腹腔热化疗(HIPEC)的术后恢复增强(ERAS):一项横断面调查。
目的:腹膜恶性肿瘤患者接受细胞减少手术(CRS)伴/不伴腹腔高温化疗(HIPEC)的术后增强恢复(ERAS)方案一直受到质疑。本调查旨在探讨临床医生对CRS-HIPEC患者ERAS的做法。方法:对76个问题进行在线调查,涉及康复前(n=11)、术前(n=8)、术中(n=16)和术后(n=32)管理。受访者包括外科医生、麻醉师和重症监护专家。结果:应答率为66%(136/206名受访临床医生)。91%的受访者表示实施了ERAS实践。康复前(76-95%)、术前(50-94%)和术中(55-90%)ERAS实践的依从性令人鼓舞。84.5%的患者使用机械肠道准备。腹内引流使用率为94.7%,肋间引流使用率为77.9%。84%的从业人员采用鼻胃引流。据50%的答复者报告,平均住院时间为10天。根据我们的研究结果,根据最近的ERAS- crs - hipec指南,设计了工作方案和ERAS检查表。该方案将进行前瞻性验证。结论:虽然作为结直肠和妇科指南的外推,但大多数应答者正在为接受CRS-HIPEC的患者实施ERAS实践。与其他围手术期做法相比,术后做法的采用率相对较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
23
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Do all patients that undergo a ‘complete’ secondary cytoreductive surgery for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer, benefit from it? In vitro 3D microfluidic peritoneal metastatic colorectal cancer model for testing different oxaliplatin-based HIPEC regimens. Ascites does not accompany pleural effusion developing under dasatinib therapy in patients with CML-CP. Active surveillance for low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN) Peritoneal mestastases from rare ovarian cancer treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1