Pleura and Peritoneum最新文献

Objectives: Pleural effusion (PE) is the most frequent pulmonary complication of dasatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Concurrent pericardial effusions have been reported in about one-third of the cases. In this study, we aimed to investigate ascites generation in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) patients developing PE under dasatinib.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study to evaluate whether pericardial effusion and ascites accompany PE in CML-CP patients treated with dasatinib. For this purpose, consecutive patients with CML-CP who developed PE under dasatinib therapy have been evaluated with chest X-ray, transthoracic echocardiography, and abdominal ultrasonography.

Results: There were seven patients, and the median age was 50 years (range, 31-73 years). Most of patients were male (n=5). All patients received imatinib as first-line TKI. Six patients received dasatinib following imatinib failure in second line. The median duration from dasatinib initiation to PE generation was 58 months (range, 8-135 months). Consequently, four patients had grade 1 pericardial effusion, and no patient had ascites.

Conclusions: In our small study, dasatinib-related PE was associated with low-grade pericardial effusion but no ascites. There are hypothetical explanations of this phenomenon including the simultaneous activation/inhibition of kinases; however, more research needs to be performed on this topic.

Objectives: Treatment of colorectal peritoneal metastases with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is still evolving. Conducting a randomized trial is challenging due to the high heterogeneity in the presentation of peritoneal disease and various surgical approaches. Biological research may facilitate more rapid translation of information into clinical practice. There is an emerging need for a preclinical model to improve HIPEC treatment protocols in terms of drug doses and treatment durations. The aim of the study is to design a tool that serves as an in vitro three-dimensional (3D) microfluidic peritoneal metastatic colorectal cancer model to test the efficacy of different HIPEC treatments.

Methods: We determined the effects of current therapy options using a 3D static disease model on human colon carcinoma cell lines (HCT 116) and transforming growth factor-β1 induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) HCT 116 lines at 37 °C and 42 °C for 30, 60, and 120 min. We determined oxaliplatin's half maximal inhibitory concentrations in a 3D static culture by using viability assay. Clinical practices of HIPEC were applied in the developed model.

Results: EMT-induced HCT 116 cells were less sensitive to oxaliplatin treatment compared to non-induced cells. We observed increased cytotoxicity when increasing the temperature from 37 °C to 42 °C and extending the treatment duration from 30 to 120 min. We found that 200 mg/m² oxaliplatin administered for 120 min is the most effective HIPEC treatment option within the framework of clinic applications.

Conclusions: The tool map provide insights into creating more realistic pre-clinical tools that could be used for a patient-based drug screening.

Objectives: This is the first UK trial of pressurised intraperitoneal aerosolised chemotherapy (PIPAC) for colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases. This trial aimed to assess the impact of PIPAC in combination with standard of care systemic treatment on: progression free survival (PFS); quality of life (QoL); and short-term complications. In addition, this trial set out to demonstrate that PIPAC can be performed safely in operating theatres within a National Health Service (NHS) setting.

Methods: Single-centre clinical trial with prospective data collection for patients undergoing 8-weekly PIPAC with oxaliplatin at 92 mg/m² from January 2019 till January 2022. Progression free survival was assessed using peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) by CT scans and laparoscopy. Quality of life was assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Adverse events were recorded using CTCAE.

Results: Five patients underwent a total of ten PIPAC administrations (median 2, range 1-4). Median PFS was 6.0 months. QoL was maintained across repeat PIPAC procedures but a decrease in social functioning and increased fatigue were evident. Three incidences of grade 3 adverse events occurred but PIPAC was well tolerated.

Conclusions: The presented data demonstrates that PIPAC is feasible and can be safely delivered within the NHS for patients with colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases, but caution must also be exercised given a risk of adverse events. Systemic chemotherapy can be safely administered at a different unit to the PIPAC procedure if both groups have clear lines of communication and timely data sharing.