Topical Intranasal Fluorescein to Diagnose and Localize Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak: A Systematic Review.

IF 0.7 Q4 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Turkish Archives of Otorhinolaryngology Pub Date : 2021-09-01 Epub Date: 2021-10-15 DOI:10.4274/tao.2021.2021-3-12
Hussain Albaharna, Mohammad Alshareef, Saud Alromaih, Mohammad Aloulah, Saad Alsaleh, Ahmad Alroqi
{"title":"Topical Intranasal Fluorescein to Diagnose and Localize Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Hussain Albaharna,&nbsp;Mohammad Alshareef,&nbsp;Saud Alromaih,&nbsp;Mohammad Aloulah,&nbsp;Saad Alsaleh,&nbsp;Ahmad Alroqi","doi":"10.4274/tao.2021.2021-3-12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluates the available evidence regarding using topical intranasal fluorescein (TINF) to diagnose and localize nasal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted through PubMed, the Cochrane Database, Scopus, and Ovid to identify the articles providing insight into using TINF to diagnose CSF leak preoperatively or to localize the leak intraoperatively. The articles from the database were screened and filtered by two authors according to the selection criteria. A spreadsheet was created to collect the data including demographic characteristics, the sensitivity and specificity of TINF for diagnosing and localizing a CSF leak, the protocol of applying TINF, and the complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After excluding duplicates and articles that did not meet our selection criteria, we included five reports in the final analysis. The average age of the 94 participants was 39.5, and there was an equal distribution of males and females. The sensitivity of TINF to make a preoperative diagnosis of CSF leak was 100%, and it was 97% to localize the site intraoperatively. Complications associated with TINF were not reported in any of the reports. This review showed a grade C recommendation based on five case series.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the current evidence, TINF cannot be recommended for standard clinical practice. It can, however, be considered in situations where other gold standard tools are unavailable since it is feasible and easy to use. A standardized control trial should be conducted to yield additional unbiased evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":44240,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","volume":"59 3","pages":"223-229"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/51/2f/tao-59-223.PMC8527542.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/tao.2021.2021-3-12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluates the available evidence regarding using topical intranasal fluorescein (TINF) to diagnose and localize nasal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak.

Methods: A literature search was conducted through PubMed, the Cochrane Database, Scopus, and Ovid to identify the articles providing insight into using TINF to diagnose CSF leak preoperatively or to localize the leak intraoperatively. The articles from the database were screened and filtered by two authors according to the selection criteria. A spreadsheet was created to collect the data including demographic characteristics, the sensitivity and specificity of TINF for diagnosing and localizing a CSF leak, the protocol of applying TINF, and the complications.

Results: After excluding duplicates and articles that did not meet our selection criteria, we included five reports in the final analysis. The average age of the 94 participants was 39.5, and there was an equal distribution of males and females. The sensitivity of TINF to make a preoperative diagnosis of CSF leak was 100%, and it was 97% to localize the site intraoperatively. Complications associated with TINF were not reported in any of the reports. This review showed a grade C recommendation based on five case series.

Conclusion: Based on the current evidence, TINF cannot be recommended for standard clinical practice. It can, however, be considered in situations where other gold standard tools are unavailable since it is feasible and easy to use. A standardized control trial should be conducted to yield additional unbiased evidence.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
局部鼻内荧光素诊断和定位脑脊液泄漏:一项系统综述。
目的:本研究评估使用局部鼻内荧光素(TINF)诊断和定位鼻脑脊液(CSF)泄漏的现有证据。方法:通过PubMed、Cochrane数据库、Scopus和Ovid进行文献检索,找出对术前应用TINF诊断脑脊液泄漏或术中定位泄漏有启发的文章。数据库中的文章由两位作者根据选择标准进行筛选。创建了一个电子表格来收集数据,包括人口统计学特征、TINF诊断和定位脑脊液泄漏的敏感性和特异性、应用TINF的方案以及并发症。结果:在排除重复和不符合我们选择标准的文章后,我们在最终分析中纳入了5篇报告。94名参与者的平均年龄为39.5岁,男女分布均匀。TINF术前诊断脑脊液漏的敏感性为100%,术中定位脑脊液漏的敏感性为97%。所有报告均未报道与TINF相关的并发症。这篇综述基于五个病例系列给出了C级推荐。结论:根据目前的证据,TINF不能推荐用于标准临床实践。但是,在其他黄金标准工具不可用的情况下,可以考虑使用它,因为它是可行且易于使用的。应进行标准化的对照试验,以获得额外的公正证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the Performance of ChatGPT, Gemini, and Bing Compared with Resident Surgeons in the Otorhinolaryngology In-service Training Examination. Investigation of Acoustic Voice Characteristics of Individuals Diagnosed with Muscle Tension Dysphonia. Management of Disseminated Rhinosporidiosis: Experience From a Single Tertiary Institution. Salvage Endoscopic Nasopharyngectomy for Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Cancer: an Institutional Experience. Optimizing Surgical Management of Acute Invasive Fungal Sinusitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1