Reading Eye Movements Performance on iPad vs Print Using a Visagraph.

IF 1.3 4区 心理学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Eye Movement Research Pub Date : 2021-09-14 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.16910/jemr.14.2.6
Alicia Feis, Amanda Lallensack, Elizabeth Pallante, Melanie Nielsen, Nicole Demarco, Balamurali Vasudevan
{"title":"Reading Eye Movements Performance on iPad vs Print Using a Visagraph.","authors":"Alicia Feis, Amanda Lallensack, Elizabeth Pallante, Melanie Nielsen, Nicole Demarco, Balamurali Vasudevan","doi":"10.16910/jemr.14.2.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated reading comprehension, reading speed, and the quality of eye movements while reading on an iPad, as compared to printed text. 31 visually-normal subjects were enrolled. Two of the passages were read from the Visagraph standardized text on iPad and Print. Eye movement characteristics and comprehension were evaluated. Mean (SD) fixation duration was significantly longer with the iPad at 270 ms (40) compared to the printed text (p=0.04) at 260 ms (40). Subjects’ mean reading rates were significantly lower on the iPad at 294 words per minute (wpm) than the printed text at 318 wpm (p=0.03). The mean (SD) overall reading duration was significantly (p=0.02) slower on the iPad that took 31 s (9.3) than the printed text at 28 s (8.0). Overall reading performance is lower with an iPad than printed text in normal individuals. These findings might be more consequential in children and adult slower readers when they read using iPads.","PeriodicalId":15813,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Eye Movement Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8557948/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Eye Movement Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.14.2.6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This study investigated reading comprehension, reading speed, and the quality of eye movements while reading on an iPad, as compared to printed text. 31 visually-normal subjects were enrolled. Two of the passages were read from the Visagraph standardized text on iPad and Print. Eye movement characteristics and comprehension were evaluated. Mean (SD) fixation duration was significantly longer with the iPad at 270 ms (40) compared to the printed text (p=0.04) at 260 ms (40). Subjects’ mean reading rates were significantly lower on the iPad at 294 words per minute (wpm) than the printed text at 318 wpm (p=0.03). The mean (SD) overall reading duration was significantly (p=0.02) slower on the iPad that took 31 s (9.3) than the printed text at 28 s (8.0). Overall reading performance is lower with an iPad than printed text in normal individuals. These findings might be more consequential in children and adult slower readers when they read using iPads.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
iPad上的阅读眼动表现vs使用Visagraph打印。
这项研究调查了在iPad上阅读时的阅读理解、阅读速度和眼球运动质量,并将其与印刷文本进行了比较。纳入31名视力正常的受试者。其中两篇文章是在iPad和Print上阅读Visagraph标准文本。评估眼动特征和理解能力。iPad的平均(SD)注视时间为270 ms(40),显著长于印刷文本的260 ms (40) (p=0.04)。受试者在iPad上的平均阅读速度为每分钟294个单词,显著低于印刷文本的每分钟318个单词(p=0.03)。iPad上的平均(SD)整体阅读时间(31秒,9.3秒)明显慢于印刷文本的28秒(8.0秒)(p=0.02)。使用iPad的整体阅读表现低于正常人的打印文本。这些发现可能对使用ipad阅读速度较慢的儿童和成人更为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
33.30%
发文量
10
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Eye Movement Research is an open-access, peer-reviewed scientific periodical devoted to all aspects of oculomotor functioning including methodology of eye recording, neurophysiological and cognitive models, attention, reading, as well as applications in neurology, ergonomy, media research and other areas,
期刊最新文献
Persistence of primitive reflexes associated with asymmetries in fixation and ocular motility values. Influence of complexity and Gestalt principles on aesthetic preferences for building façades: An eye tracking study Classification framework to identify similar visual scan paths using multiple similarity metrics Gender selection dilemma in FMCG advertising: Insights from eye-tracking research Gaze behavior reveals automaticity and attention allocation during music teaching vs. observing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1