Comparative Effectiveness of Proton Therapy versus Photon Radiotherapy in Adolescents and Young Adults for Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma.

IF 2.1 Q3 ONCOLOGY International Journal of Particle Therapy Pub Date : 2021-07-08 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.14338/IJPT-21-00011.1
James E Bates, Stephanie Terezakis, Christopher G Morris, Avani D Rao, Shuchi Sehgal, Rahul Kumar, Raymond B Mailhot Vega, Nancy P Mendenhall, Bradford S Hoppe
{"title":"Comparative Effectiveness of Proton Therapy versus Photon Radiotherapy in Adolescents and Young Adults for Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma.","authors":"James E Bates,&nbsp;Stephanie Terezakis,&nbsp;Christopher G Morris,&nbsp;Avani D Rao,&nbsp;Shuchi Sehgal,&nbsp;Rahul Kumar,&nbsp;Raymond B Mailhot Vega,&nbsp;Nancy P Mendenhall,&nbsp;Bradford S Hoppe","doi":"10.14338/IJPT-21-00011.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Early stage (stages I-II) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is a highly curable disease typically diagnosed in adolescents and young adults (AYAs). Proton therapy can also reduce the late toxicity burden in this population, but data on its comparative efficacy with photon radiotherapy in this population are sparse. We assessed outcomes in AYAs with cHL in a multi-institution retrospective review.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We identified 94 patients aged 15 to 40 years with stages I and II cHL treated with radiotherapy as part of their initial treatment between 2008 and 2017. We used Kaplan-Meier analyses and log-rank testing to evaluate survival differences between groups of patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 91 patients were included in the analysis. The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 89%. Of the 12 patients who experienced progression after radiotherapy, 4 occurred out-of-field, 2 occurred in-field, and 6 experienced both in- and out-of-field progression. There was no significant difference in 2-year PFS among AYA patients by radiotherapy dose received (≥ 30 Gy, 91%; < 30 Gy, 86%; <i>P</i> = .82). Likewise, there was no difference in 2-year PFS among patients who received either proton or photon radiotherapy (proton, 94%; photon, 83%; <i>P</i> = .07).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our cohort of AYA patients had comparable outcomes regardless of radiotherapy dose or modality used. For patients with significant risk of radiation-induced late effects, proton therapy is a reasonable treatment modality.</p>","PeriodicalId":36923,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Particle Therapy","volume":"8 3","pages":"21-27"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8768899/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Particle Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14338/IJPT-21-00011.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: Early stage (stages I-II) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is a highly curable disease typically diagnosed in adolescents and young adults (AYAs). Proton therapy can also reduce the late toxicity burden in this population, but data on its comparative efficacy with photon radiotherapy in this population are sparse. We assessed outcomes in AYAs with cHL in a multi-institution retrospective review.

Materials and methods: We identified 94 patients aged 15 to 40 years with stages I and II cHL treated with radiotherapy as part of their initial treatment between 2008 and 2017. We used Kaplan-Meier analyses and log-rank testing to evaluate survival differences between groups of patients.

Results: A total of 91 patients were included in the analysis. The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 89%. Of the 12 patients who experienced progression after radiotherapy, 4 occurred out-of-field, 2 occurred in-field, and 6 experienced both in- and out-of-field progression. There was no significant difference in 2-year PFS among AYA patients by radiotherapy dose received (≥ 30 Gy, 91%; < 30 Gy, 86%; P = .82). Likewise, there was no difference in 2-year PFS among patients who received either proton or photon radiotherapy (proton, 94%; photon, 83%; P = .07).

Conclusion: Our cohort of AYA patients had comparable outcomes regardless of radiotherapy dose or modality used. For patients with significant risk of radiation-induced late effects, proton therapy is a reasonable treatment modality.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
质子治疗与光子放疗在青少年和青壮年治疗经典霍奇金淋巴瘤的疗效比较。
目的:早期(I-II期)经典霍奇金淋巴瘤(cHL)是一种高度可治愈的疾病,通常诊断于青少年和青壮年(AYAs)。质子治疗也可以减少这一人群的晚期毒性负担,但其与光子放疗在这一人群中的比较疗效的数据很少。我们在一项多机构回顾性评价中评估了患有cHL的aya患者的预后。材料和方法:我们确定了94例年龄在15至40岁之间的I期和II期cHL患者,这些患者在2008年至2017年期间接受了放疗作为初始治疗的一部分。我们使用Kaplan-Meier分析和log-rank检验来评估两组患者的生存差异。结果:共纳入91例患者。2年无进展生存(PFS)率为89%。12例放疗后出现进展的患者中,4例发生野外进展,2例发生野内进展,6例同时发生野内和野外进展。不同放疗剂量AYA患者的2年PFS无显著差异(≥30 Gy, 91%;p = .82)。同样,接受质子或光子放疗的患者的2年PFS也没有差异(质子,94%;光子,83%;p = .07)。结论:无论使用何种放疗剂量或方式,我们的AYA患者队列具有可比性的结果。对于有放射诱导的晚期效应风险的患者,质子治疗是一种合理的治疗方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Particle Therapy
International Journal of Particle Therapy Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
23
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Carbon-Ion Radiation Therapy in Japan: A Japanese National Registry Study. The Level of Circulating M-MDSCs as an Indicator for the Therapeutic Outcome of BNCT in End-Stage Malignant Brain Tumor Patients. Vaginal Mucosal Melanoma Cell Activation in Response to Photon or Carbon Ion Irradiation. Navigating a New Frontier: Evaluating Leadless Pacemakers in Proton Therapy. Cardiac Conduction System as an OAR in Radiation Therapy: Doses to SA/AV Nodes and Their Reduction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1