Perspectives of engagement in distance debriefings.

IF 2.8 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Advances in simulation (London, England) Pub Date : 2021-11-08 DOI:10.1186/s41077-021-00192-y
Cynthia J Mosher, Alex Morton, Janice C Palaganas
{"title":"Perspectives of engagement in distance debriefings.","authors":"Cynthia J Mosher,&nbsp;Alex Morton,&nbsp;Janice C Palaganas","doi":"10.1186/s41077-021-00192-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic propelled remote simulation and online distance debriefings. Like in-person debriefings, educators seek to facilitate reflective learning conversations, yet, in the online setting, educators face challenges to learner engagement that differ considerably from in-person debriefing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a thematic analysis of fourteen semi-structured interviews conducted with fourteen participants who had experience with virtual debriefing as an educator or as a learner. We explored the experiences and perceptions of both educators and learners to provide a more in-depth understanding of the factors that influence engagement in online distance debriefing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study identified the challenges online distance debriefing poses for educators and learners. We found ten themes that support the Community of Inquiry (CoI) theoretical framework and provided additional considerations related to internal and external factors of engagement, including the influence of the simulation, false engagement, and self-presence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We believe these findings can inform the design and facilitation of online debriefings to help provide educators with guidance and innovative solutions to best engage their learners in the challenging online environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":72108,"journal":{"name":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","volume":"6 1","pages":"40"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8575148/pdf/","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-021-00192-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic propelled remote simulation and online distance debriefings. Like in-person debriefings, educators seek to facilitate reflective learning conversations, yet, in the online setting, educators face challenges to learner engagement that differ considerably from in-person debriefing.

Methods: We performed a thematic analysis of fourteen semi-structured interviews conducted with fourteen participants who had experience with virtual debriefing as an educator or as a learner. We explored the experiences and perceptions of both educators and learners to provide a more in-depth understanding of the factors that influence engagement in online distance debriefing.

Results: Our study identified the challenges online distance debriefing poses for educators and learners. We found ten themes that support the Community of Inquiry (CoI) theoretical framework and provided additional considerations related to internal and external factors of engagement, including the influence of the simulation, false engagement, and self-presence.

Conclusions: We believe these findings can inform the design and facilitation of online debriefings to help provide educators with guidance and innovative solutions to best engage their learners in the challenging online environment.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
远程汇报中的参与视角。
背景:新冠肺炎疫情推动了远程模拟和在线远程汇报。就像面对面的汇报一样,教育者寻求促进反思性学习对话,然而,在在线环境中,教育者面临着学习者参与的挑战,这与面对面的汇报有很大不同。方法:我们对14位参与者进行了14次半结构化访谈,这些参与者作为教育者或学习者都有过虚拟汇报的经历。我们探讨了教育者和学习者的经验和看法,以更深入地了解影响在线远程汇报参与的因素。结果:我们的研究确定了在线远程汇报给教育者和学习者带来的挑战。我们发现了十个支持探究共同体(CoI)理论框架的主题,并提供了与参与的内部和外部因素相关的额外考虑,包括模拟的影响、虚假参与和自我存在。结论:我们相信这些发现可以为在线情况汇报的设计和促进提供信息,帮助教育工作者提供指导和创新的解决方案,以便在充满挑战的在线环境中最好地吸引学习者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
What can simulation educators learn from the reluctant participant? An exploration of the factors influencing engagement amongst adult learners participating in paediatric simulation training. Combining forces to improve simulation-based practices for Emergency Preparedness and Disaster Responses. When is synthetic sufficient? Ethical considerations and alternatives in simulation-based ultrasound education. To intubate or to resuscitate: the effect of simulation-based training on advanced airway management during simulated paediatric resuscitations. Facilitators' experiences with virtual simulation and their impact on learning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1