Hybrid [18F]-F-DOPA PET/MRI Interpretation Criteria and Scores for Glioma Follow-up After Radiotherapy.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2022-09-01 Epub Date: 2022-02-11 DOI:10.1007/s00062-022-01139-0
Marc Bertaux, Arnaud Berenbaum, Anna-Luisa Di Stefano, Laura Rozenblum, Marine Soret, Sebastien Bergeret, Khé Hoang-Xuan, Laure-Eugenie Tainturier, Brian Sgard, Marie-Odile Habert, Jean-Yves Delattre, Caroline Dehais, Ahmed Idbaih, Nadya Pyatigorskaya, Aurelie Kas
{"title":"Hybrid [<sup>18</sup>F]-F-DOPA PET/MRI Interpretation Criteria and Scores for Glioma Follow-up After Radiotherapy.","authors":"Marc Bertaux,&nbsp;Arnaud Berenbaum,&nbsp;Anna-Luisa Di Stefano,&nbsp;Laura Rozenblum,&nbsp;Marine Soret,&nbsp;Sebastien Bergeret,&nbsp;Khé Hoang-Xuan,&nbsp;Laure-Eugenie Tainturier,&nbsp;Brian Sgard,&nbsp;Marie-Odile Habert,&nbsp;Jean-Yves Delattre,&nbsp;Caroline Dehais,&nbsp;Ahmed Idbaih,&nbsp;Nadya Pyatigorskaya,&nbsp;Aurelie Kas","doi":"10.1007/s00062-022-01139-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong><sup>18</sup>F‑fluoro-L‑3,4‑dihydroxyphenylalanine positron emission tomography (F‑DOPA PET) is used in glioma follow-up after radiotherapy to discriminate treatment-related changes (TRC) from tumor progression (TP). We compared the performances of a combined PET and MRI analysis with F‑DOPA current standard of interpretation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 76 consecutive patients showing at least one gadolinium-enhanced lesion on the T1‑w MRI sequence (T1G). Two nuclear medicine physicians blindly analyzed PET/MRI images. In addition to the conventional PET analysis, they looked for F‑DOPA uptake(s) outside T1G-enhanced areas (T1G/PET), in the white matter (WM/PET), for T1G-enhanced lesion(s) without sufficiently concordant F‑DOPA uptake (T1G+/PET), and F‑DOPA uptake(s) away from hemorrhagic changes as shown with a susceptibility weighted imaging sequence (SWI/PET). We measured lesions' F‑DOPA uptake ratio using healthy brain background (TBR) and striatum (T/S) as references, and lesions' perfusion with arterial spin labelling cerebral blood flow maps (rCBF). Scores were determined by logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>53 and 23 patients were diagnosed with TP and TRC, respectively. The accuracies were 74% for T/S, 76% for TBR, and 84% for rCBF, with best cut-off values of 1.3, 3.7 and 1.25, respectively. For hybrid variables, best accuracies were obtained with conventional analysis (82%), T1G+/PET (82%) and SWI/PET (81%). T1G+/PET, SWI/PET and rCBF ≥ 1.25 were selected to construct a 3-point score. It outperformed conventional analysis and rCBF with an AUC of 0.94 and an accuracy of 87%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our scoring approach combining F‑DOPA PET and MRI provided better accuracy than conventional PET analyses for distinguishing TP from TRC in our patients after radiation therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":49298,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuroradiology","volume":"32 3","pages":"735-747"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-022-01139-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Objective: 18F‑fluoro-L‑3,4‑dihydroxyphenylalanine positron emission tomography (F‑DOPA PET) is used in glioma follow-up after radiotherapy to discriminate treatment-related changes (TRC) from tumor progression (TP). We compared the performances of a combined PET and MRI analysis with F‑DOPA current standard of interpretation.

Methods: We included 76 consecutive patients showing at least one gadolinium-enhanced lesion on the T1‑w MRI sequence (T1G). Two nuclear medicine physicians blindly analyzed PET/MRI images. In addition to the conventional PET analysis, they looked for F‑DOPA uptake(s) outside T1G-enhanced areas (T1G/PET), in the white matter (WM/PET), for T1G-enhanced lesion(s) without sufficiently concordant F‑DOPA uptake (T1G+/PET), and F‑DOPA uptake(s) away from hemorrhagic changes as shown with a susceptibility weighted imaging sequence (SWI/PET). We measured lesions' F‑DOPA uptake ratio using healthy brain background (TBR) and striatum (T/S) as references, and lesions' perfusion with arterial spin labelling cerebral blood flow maps (rCBF). Scores were determined by logistic regression.

Results: 53 and 23 patients were diagnosed with TP and TRC, respectively. The accuracies were 74% for T/S, 76% for TBR, and 84% for rCBF, with best cut-off values of 1.3, 3.7 and 1.25, respectively. For hybrid variables, best accuracies were obtained with conventional analysis (82%), T1G+/PET (82%) and SWI/PET (81%). T1G+/PET, SWI/PET and rCBF ≥ 1.25 were selected to construct a 3-point score. It outperformed conventional analysis and rCBF with an AUC of 0.94 and an accuracy of 87%.

Conclusions: Our scoring approach combining F‑DOPA PET and MRI provided better accuracy than conventional PET analyses for distinguishing TP from TRC in our patients after radiation therapy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脑胶质瘤放疗后随访的杂种[18F]-F-DOPA PET/MRI解释标准及评分。
目的:18F -氟- l - 3,4 -二羟基苯丙氨酸正电子发射断层扫描(F - DOPA PET)用于胶质瘤放疗后随访,以区分治疗相关改变(TRC)和肿瘤进展(TP)。我们比较了PET和MRI联合分析与F - DOPA当前解释标准的性能。方法:我们纳入了76例连续在T1 - w MRI序列(T1G)上显示至少一个钆增强病变的患者。两名核医学医生盲目分析PET/MRI图像。除了常规的PET分析,他们寻找T1G增强区域(T1G/PET)外的F - DOPA摄取(s),白质(WM/PET),对于T1G增强病变(s)没有充分一致的F - DOPA摄取(T1G+/PET), F - DOPA摄取(s)远离出血变化,如敏感性加权成像序列(SWI/PET)所示。我们使用健康脑背景(TBR)和纹状体(T/S)作为参考测量病变的F - DOPA摄取比,并使用动脉自旋标记脑血流图(rCBF)测量病变的灌注。通过逻辑回归确定得分。结果:53例诊断为TP, 23例诊断为TRC。T/S、TBR和rCBF的准确率分别为74%、76%和84%,最佳临界值分别为1.3、3.7和1.25。对于混合变量,常规分析(82%)、T1G+/PET(82%)和SWI/PET(81%)的准确度最高。选择T1G+/PET、SWI/PET和rCBF ≥1.25构建3分评分。其AUC为0.94,准确度为87%,优于常规分析和rCBF。结论:我们的评分方法结合F - DOPA PET和MRI,在区分放射治疗后TP和TRC方面比传统PET分析具有更高的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neuroradiology
Clinical Neuroradiology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
106
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Neuroradiology provides current information, original contributions, and reviews in the field of neuroradiology. An interdisciplinary approach is accomplished by diagnostic and therapeutic contributions related to associated subjects. The international coverage and relevance of the journal is underlined by its being the official journal of the German, Swiss, and Austrian Societies of Neuroradiology.
期刊最新文献
Endovascular Treatment of Carotid Artery Dissection Caused by Eagle's Syndrome : Case Report. Pre-stroke Functional Status in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Thrombectomy: How Relevant Are False Estimations in the Emergency Setting? The DERIVO 2 Heal Embolization Device in the Treatment of Ruptured and Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: a Retrospective Multicenter Study. A New Fibrin-Heparine Coated Self-Expanding Stent for the Rescue Treatment of Intracranial Stenosis-a Multicentric Study. Trevo 3 Mm and/or AXS Catalyst 5 for the Treatment of Medium Distal Vessel Occlusion Stroke-results from the ASSIST Registry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1