Comparison of patient satisfaction with diode laser treatment of female hirsutism: low fluence or high fluence?

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy Pub Date : 2021-08-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-11 DOI:10.1080/14764172.2021.2001533
Mohammad Ebrahimzadeh Ardakani, Mehran Azad, Narges Ghanei, Farshid Etaee, Tarek Naguib, Steven Daveluy
{"title":"Comparison of patient satisfaction with diode laser treatment of female hirsutism: low fluence or high fluence?","authors":"Mohammad Ebrahimzadeh Ardakani,&nbsp;Mehran Azad,&nbsp;Narges Ghanei,&nbsp;Farshid Etaee,&nbsp;Tarek Naguib,&nbsp;Steven Daveluy","doi":"10.1080/14764172.2021.2001533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The optimal fluence for treating hirsutism with the diode laser has not been elucidated. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the satisfaction and side effects of patients who have been treated with two diode laser therapy techniques: high-fluence and low-fluence. In this cross-sectional study, the medical records of 182 patients referred to Yazd Laser center were collected. Various side effects of laser therapy were assessed, and the satisfaction rate of the patients was evaluated at three points: after the first session, at the end of the treatment course, and six months after the end of the treatment. The satisfaction level after the first session of the laser treatment was higher with the low-fluence technique (<i>P</i>-value<0.001). The satisfaction level at the end of treatment was the same in the two groups (<i>P</i>-value = 0.394). However, six months after the treatment, satisfaction level was significantly higher with the low-fluence technique (<i>P</i>-value = 0.005). The rate of complications, such as burn and pain, was higher in the high-fluence group, while the number of treatment sessions was lower with the high-fluence technique. The low-fluence method of laser therapy has fewer complications associated with greater patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":54852,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14764172.2021.2001533","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The optimal fluence for treating hirsutism with the diode laser has not been elucidated. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the satisfaction and side effects of patients who have been treated with two diode laser therapy techniques: high-fluence and low-fluence. In this cross-sectional study, the medical records of 182 patients referred to Yazd Laser center were collected. Various side effects of laser therapy were assessed, and the satisfaction rate of the patients was evaluated at three points: after the first session, at the end of the treatment course, and six months after the end of the treatment. The satisfaction level after the first session of the laser treatment was higher with the low-fluence technique (P-value<0.001). The satisfaction level at the end of treatment was the same in the two groups (P-value = 0.394). However, six months after the treatment, satisfaction level was significantly higher with the low-fluence technique (P-value = 0.005). The rate of complications, such as burn and pain, was higher in the high-fluence group, while the number of treatment sessions was lower with the high-fluence technique. The low-fluence method of laser therapy has fewer complications associated with greater patient satisfaction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
二极管激光治疗女性多毛症患者满意度的比较:低影响还是高影响?
用二极管激光治疗多毛症的最佳效果尚未阐明。本研究的目的是评估和比较采用高通量和低通量两种二极管激光治疗技术的患者的满意度和副作用。本横断面研究收集182例亚兹德激光中心患者的医疗记录。评估激光治疗的各种副作用,并在第一次治疗后、疗程结束时、治疗结束后6个月三个时间点评估患者的满意率。低通量技术对第一次激光治疗后的满意度较高(p -value = 0.394)。而在治疗6个月后,低通量技术的满意度显著高于低通量技术(p值= 0.005)。并发症的发生率,如烧伤和疼痛,在高通量组较高,而高通量技术的治疗次数较低。低通量激光治疗方法并发症少,患者满意度高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A unique journal that focuses on the application of cosmetic laser and light therapies on the skin. The Journal of Cosmetic & Laser Therapy provides a forum for stimulating and up-to-date studies demonstrating the wide range of therapeutic options for clinicians and surgeons involved in cosmetic and dermatological treatment. The journal is aimed at dermatologists, cosmetic surgeons, plastic and facial plastic surgeons, oculoplastic surgeons and all those interested in the rapidly expanding field of cosmetic and laser therapy. Features include: -Cosmetic surgery, including facial rejuvenation, hair removal and skin resurfacing -Use of lasers and other light sources for cosmetic and dermatological treatment -Applications of peeling agents, fillers, injectables, implants and other cosmetic modalities -Topical treatments -Practical tips and safety issues
期刊最新文献
A clinical study on the efficacy of high frequency therapy on nasolabial and periorbital wrinkles. Pulsed dye laser in jellyfish-induced keloids. A case of resistant granuloma faciale successfully treated with ablative fractional carbon dioxide laser. A comparison of surgical scar treatment using various combinations of autologous fat, hyaluronic acid and resurfacing with the 1540 nm non-ablative Erbium laser - a prospective pilot study. Intralesional vitamin D3 versus intralesional triamcinolone acetonoid in patchy alopecia areata: a comparative clinical and dermoscopic study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1