Negotiating boundaries: reflections on the ethics of arts-based and artistic research in care contexts.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Arts & Health Pub Date : 2022-10-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-17 DOI:10.1080/17533015.2021.1999279
Anu Laukkanen, Liisa Jaakonaho, Heidi Fast, Taru-Anneli Koivisto
{"title":"Negotiating boundaries: reflections on the ethics of arts-based and artistic research in care contexts.","authors":"Anu Laukkanen,&nbsp;Liisa Jaakonaho,&nbsp;Heidi Fast,&nbsp;Taru-Anneli Koivisto","doi":"10.1080/17533015.2021.1999279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Arts-based practice and research in care has increased significantly. There is a need to examine the ethical issues arising from this complex phenomenon, conceptualised as boundary work.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>To support interdisciplinary understanding in artistic and arts-based work, we collaboratively explored three arts-based research projects implemented in diverse care and healthcare contexts. The ethical issues related to boundary work were negotiated through reciprocal, in-depth reflection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Arts-based and artistic research allows embodied, sensitive, and sensible encounters to emerge, in which the boundaries between artistic agency, professional positions, and even notions of evidence may be challenged. The notion of vulnerability emerges as a central ethical feature of boundary work.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Articulating ethical concerns in artistic-pedagogic boundary work and research can promote a more nuanced understanding of power relations in cross-sectoral practices. It may help develop services that support the agency and holistic well-being of individuals and communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":45944,"journal":{"name":"Arts & Health","volume":"14 3","pages":"341-354"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arts & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17533015.2021.1999279","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Arts-based practice and research in care has increased significantly. There is a need to examine the ethical issues arising from this complex phenomenon, conceptualised as boundary work.

Method: To support interdisciplinary understanding in artistic and arts-based work, we collaboratively explored three arts-based research projects implemented in diverse care and healthcare contexts. The ethical issues related to boundary work were negotiated through reciprocal, in-depth reflection.

Results: Arts-based and artistic research allows embodied, sensitive, and sensible encounters to emerge, in which the boundaries between artistic agency, professional positions, and even notions of evidence may be challenged. The notion of vulnerability emerges as a central ethical feature of boundary work.

Conclusions: Articulating ethical concerns in artistic-pedagogic boundary work and research can promote a more nuanced understanding of power relations in cross-sectoral practices. It may help develop services that support the agency and holistic well-being of individuals and communities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
协商边界:在护理背景下对艺术和艺术研究伦理的反思。
背景:以艺术为基础的护理实践和研究显著增加。有必要研究从这一复杂现象中产生的伦理问题,将其概念化为边界工作。方法:为了支持艺术和基于艺术的工作的跨学科理解,我们合作探索了在不同护理和医疗保健环境中实施的三个基于艺术的研究项目。与边界工作有关的伦理问题是通过相互深入的反思来协商的。结果:以艺术为基础的艺术研究允许具体化的、敏感的和理智的遭遇出现,在这种情况下,艺术机构、专业职位甚至证据概念之间的界限都可能受到挑战。脆弱性的概念成为边界工作的核心伦理特征。结论:在艺术-教学边界工作和研究中阐明伦理问题可以促进对跨部门实践中权力关系的更细致的理解。它可能有助于发展支持个人和社区的机构和整体福祉的服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Arts & Health
Arts & Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
Bandwidth and brushstrokes: a digital dialectic. The work of staying whole through art. A review of theatre interventions and mental health: inspiration, elicitation and dissemination. Exploring social worker views on transgender and non-binary rights in Aotearoa New Zealand using a poemish method. Does Creative Bibliotherapy delivered in schools improve mental health-related outcomes for 5-16 year olds? A systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1