Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Adult Patients Diagnosed with Epilepsy Being Treated with Perampanel.

IF 1.8 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Patient Related Outcome Measures Pub Date : 2022-02-09 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PROM.S343302
Brian D Moseley, Shaloo Gupta, Nate Way, Jonathon Wright, John C Rowland, Victoria E Barghout, Feride Frech, Craig Plauschinat
{"title":"Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Adult Patients Diagnosed with Epilepsy Being Treated with Perampanel.","authors":"Brian D Moseley,&nbsp;Shaloo Gupta,&nbsp;Nate Way,&nbsp;Jonathon Wright,&nbsp;John C Rowland,&nbsp;Victoria E Barghout,&nbsp;Feride Frech,&nbsp;Craig Plauschinat","doi":"10.2147/PROM.S343302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Epilepsy is a complex disorder that can affect patients' medical, psychological, and social well-being. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures of health-related quality of life (HRQoL), satisfaction, and adherence in adult patients diagnosed with epilepsy treated with perampanel in the United States (US).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A US-based, multicenter, observational cross-sectional survey was completed by 61 patients taking perampanel with or without other antiseizure medications (ASMs). Respondents were ≥18 years old, had a physician-confirmed diagnosis of epilepsy, used perampanel for ≥4 months, and provided informed consent. Patients responded to questions concerning their demographic characteristics, treatment history, experiences before perampanel, experiences while taking perampanel, HRQoL, treatment satisfaction, and medication adherence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients (N=61) were 42.8 years old on average; majority were female (63.9%) and white (75.4%). Mean time on perampanel was 2.5 years, with sodium channel blockers often (55.7%) used concomitantly with perampanel. Patients reported, on average, 5.5 (standard deviation [SD]=13.2) seizures/month after initiating perampanel, whereas these same patients reported experiencing 20.4 (SD=60.0) seizures/month prior to perampanel. When comparing their experience on perampanel with their experience with previous ASMs, more patients \"strongly agreed\" that perampanel allowed them to live a more normal life (36.1% vs 27.5%) and worked as intended if they missed taking a dose (16.4% vs 7.8%). Average satisfaction scores were high, with ratings of 71.8 for effectiveness, 84.0 for convenience, and 71.9 for global satisfaction (0-100 scores). Perampanel use was associated with improvements in HRQoL and fewer symptoms of depression and anxiety. The majority of patients were adherent (62.3%) to perampanel.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Perampanel use was associated with reductions in number of seizures, better HRQoL, and high adherence rates. These results provide initial evidence that perampanel can be an effective, tolerable, and valid option for patients with epilepsy in the real world.</p>","PeriodicalId":19747,"journal":{"name":"Patient Related Outcome Measures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fa/6d/prom-13-39.PMC8841652.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Related Outcome Measures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S343302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Epilepsy is a complex disorder that can affect patients' medical, psychological, and social well-being. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures of health-related quality of life (HRQoL), satisfaction, and adherence in adult patients diagnosed with epilepsy treated with perampanel in the United States (US).

Methods: A US-based, multicenter, observational cross-sectional survey was completed by 61 patients taking perampanel with or without other antiseizure medications (ASMs). Respondents were ≥18 years old, had a physician-confirmed diagnosis of epilepsy, used perampanel for ≥4 months, and provided informed consent. Patients responded to questions concerning their demographic characteristics, treatment history, experiences before perampanel, experiences while taking perampanel, HRQoL, treatment satisfaction, and medication adherence.

Results: Patients (N=61) were 42.8 years old on average; majority were female (63.9%) and white (75.4%). Mean time on perampanel was 2.5 years, with sodium channel blockers often (55.7%) used concomitantly with perampanel. Patients reported, on average, 5.5 (standard deviation [SD]=13.2) seizures/month after initiating perampanel, whereas these same patients reported experiencing 20.4 (SD=60.0) seizures/month prior to perampanel. When comparing their experience on perampanel with their experience with previous ASMs, more patients "strongly agreed" that perampanel allowed them to live a more normal life (36.1% vs 27.5%) and worked as intended if they missed taking a dose (16.4% vs 7.8%). Average satisfaction scores were high, with ratings of 71.8 for effectiveness, 84.0 for convenience, and 71.9 for global satisfaction (0-100 scores). Perampanel use was associated with improvements in HRQoL and fewer symptoms of depression and anxiety. The majority of patients were adherent (62.3%) to perampanel.

Discussion: Perampanel use was associated with reductions in number of seizures, better HRQoL, and high adherence rates. These results provide initial evidence that perampanel can be an effective, tolerable, and valid option for patients with epilepsy in the real world.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在接受Perampanel治疗的成年癫痫患者中患者报告的结果测量。
背景:癫痫是一种复杂的疾病,可影响患者的医疗、心理和社会福祉。本研究的目的是评估在美国接受perampanel治疗的成年癫痫患者的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)、满意度和依从性的患者报告结果(PRO)测量。方法:在美国进行的一项多中心观察性横断面调查中,61名服用perampanel的患者与其他抗癫痫药物(asm)联合或不联合使用。受访者年龄≥18岁,经医生确诊为癫痫,使用perampanel时间≥4个月,并提供知情同意。患者回答了他们的人口学特征、治疗史、使用perampanel前的经历、服用perampanel时的经历、HRQoL、治疗满意度和药物依从性等问题。结果:患者61例,平均年龄42.8岁;以女性(63.9%)和白人(75.4%)居多。perampanel的平均使用时间为2.5年,钠通道阻滞剂通常(55.7%)与perampanel同时使用。在开始使用perampanel后,患者报告平均每月发作5.5次(标准差[SD]=13.2),而在使用perampanel之前,这些患者报告平均每月发作20.4次(SD=60.0)。当比较他们使用perampanel的经历和他们之前使用asm的经历时,更多的患者“强烈同意”perampanel让他们过着更正常的生活(36.1%对27.5%),如果他们错过了一次剂量(16.4%对7.8%),他们会按计划工作。平均满意度得分很高,“有效性”为71.8分,“便利性”为84.0分,“整体满意度”为71.9分(0-100分)。Perampanel的使用与HRQoL的改善以及抑郁和焦虑症状的减少有关。大多数患者(62.3%)粘附于perampanel。讨论:Perampanel的使用与癫痫发作次数的减少、更好的HRQoL和高依从率相关。这些结果提供了初步证据,证明perampanel在现实世界中对癫痫患者是一种有效、耐受和有效的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Patient Related Outcome Measures
Patient Related Outcome Measures HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
4.80%
发文量
27
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Development and Content Validation of the Patient's Qualitative Assessment of Treatment - Real-World (PQAT-RW): An Instrument to Evaluate Benefits and Disadvantages of Treatments in Real-World Settings. Exploring Barriers to Effective COVID-19 Risk Mitigation, Recovery, and Chronic Disease Self-Management: A Qualitative Multilevel Perspective. Ultra-Low Frequency Transmitted Ultrasound Breast Imaging vs DBT (Digital Breast Tomosynthesis): A Patient-Reported Outcome Study. Systematic Literature Review of Studies Reporting Measures of Functional Outcome or Quality of Life in People with Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia. Validation and Cultural Adaptation of the Sinhala Translation of the Cardiff Acne Disability Index (CADI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1